Detection and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella isolates from selected poultry farms in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Access microbiology Pub Date : 2025-05-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1099/acmi.0.000879.v5
Saxon J Mwambene, Adelard B Mtenga, Augustino A Chengula, Abubakar S Hoza
{"title":"Detection and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella isolates from selected poultry farms in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.","authors":"Saxon J Mwambene, Adelard B Mtenga, Augustino A Chengula, Abubakar S Hoza","doi":"10.1099/acmi.0.000879.v5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> <i>Salmonella</i> is one of the most prevalent foodborne bacteria, posing a significant global health concern and responsible for ~155,000 deaths and 93.8 million human foodborne illnesses annually. The rampant use of antibiotic agents to combat salmonellosis in poultry has contributed to the emergence of resistance against commonly used antibiotics. <b>Methodology.</b> The cross-sectional study was conducted between January and June 2023 across three districts in the Dar es Salaam region, Tanzania. <i>Salmonella</i> isolates were detected and confirmed by using standard microbiological conventional methods and molecular methods such as PCR and genomic sequencing. PCR was used for detecting the presence of the <i>invA</i> gene, and partial DNA sequencing was performed to identify species and their close relatedness. A Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was employed to evaluate <i>Salmonella</i> sensitivity to seven different commonly used antibiotics, namely ampicillin, azithromycin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, gentamycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline. <i>Salmonella</i> strain with reference number ATCC 8739 was used as a control. <b>Results.</b> The overall <i>Salmonella</i> isolates from faecal droppings were 6.04% (<i>n</i>=796). Of the PCR-confirmed isolates, 64.3% (<i>n</i>=28) were resistant to more than two classes of antibiotics and hence considered multidrug resistant. The highest resistance was observed with ampicillin (92.9%, <i>n</i>=26), followed by tetracycline (71.43%, <i>n</i>=20), ciprofloxacin (42.9%, <i>n</i>=12), sulphonamide (42.85%, <i>n</i>=12), gentamicin (35.7%, <i>n</i>=10) and azithromycin (28.9%, <i>n</i>=8). All the isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol (100%, <i>n</i>=28). Twenty-eight isolates were sent for sequencing, out of which 16 sequences (OR021717-OR021739) met the criteria for phylogenetic analysis. All 16 sequences had a per cent identity to EU348369 strains Senftenberg isolated from China, OL581594 <i>Salmonella</i> Newport isolated from China and EU348368 <i>Salmonella</i> Pullorum isolates from China. Other sequences diverged more distantly; these are <i>Salmonella</i> Abony with accession number CP007541 and <i>Salmonella</i> Kentucky with accession number OL581592. The tree also included an outgroup species, <i>Salmonella bongori</i>, which was downloaded from GenBank with accession numbers NC015761 and NC021870 <i>S. bongori</i>. <b>Conclusion.</b> The high level of antibiotic resistance found in this study could be due to the misuse of antibiotics in poultry management, and/or, probably, there were circulating resistant <i>Salmonella</i> strains in the environment. To reverse the trend observed, immediate interventions such as advocating for the prudent use of antibiotics in poultry production systems by strengthening extension services to poultry farmers and the use of a farmer field school model to improve poultry management through improved farm biosecurity are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":94366,"journal":{"name":"Access microbiology","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000879.v5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Salmonella is one of the most prevalent foodborne bacteria, posing a significant global health concern and responsible for ~155,000 deaths and 93.8 million human foodborne illnesses annually. The rampant use of antibiotic agents to combat salmonellosis in poultry has contributed to the emergence of resistance against commonly used antibiotics. Methodology. The cross-sectional study was conducted between January and June 2023 across three districts in the Dar es Salaam region, Tanzania. Salmonella isolates were detected and confirmed by using standard microbiological conventional methods and molecular methods such as PCR and genomic sequencing. PCR was used for detecting the presence of the invA gene, and partial DNA sequencing was performed to identify species and their close relatedness. A Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was employed to evaluate Salmonella sensitivity to seven different commonly used antibiotics, namely ampicillin, azithromycin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, gentamycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline. Salmonella strain with reference number ATCC 8739 was used as a control. Results. The overall Salmonella isolates from faecal droppings were 6.04% (n=796). Of the PCR-confirmed isolates, 64.3% (n=28) were resistant to more than two classes of antibiotics and hence considered multidrug resistant. The highest resistance was observed with ampicillin (92.9%, n=26), followed by tetracycline (71.43%, n=20), ciprofloxacin (42.9%, n=12), sulphonamide (42.85%, n=12), gentamicin (35.7%, n=10) and azithromycin (28.9%, n=8). All the isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol (100%, n=28). Twenty-eight isolates were sent for sequencing, out of which 16 sequences (OR021717-OR021739) met the criteria for phylogenetic analysis. All 16 sequences had a per cent identity to EU348369 strains Senftenberg isolated from China, OL581594 Salmonella Newport isolated from China and EU348368 Salmonella Pullorum isolates from China. Other sequences diverged more distantly; these are Salmonella Abony with accession number CP007541 and Salmonella Kentucky with accession number OL581592. The tree also included an outgroup species, Salmonella bongori, which was downloaded from GenBank with accession numbers NC015761 and NC021870 S. bongori. Conclusion. The high level of antibiotic resistance found in this study could be due to the misuse of antibiotics in poultry management, and/or, probably, there were circulating resistant Salmonella strains in the environment. To reverse the trend observed, immediate interventions such as advocating for the prudent use of antibiotics in poultry production systems by strengthening extension services to poultry farmers and the use of a farmer field school model to improve poultry management through improved farm biosecurity are required.

坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆选定家禽养殖场分离沙门氏菌的检测和抗生素耐药性。
介绍。沙门氏菌是最普遍的食源性细菌之一,引起了重大的全球健康问题,每年造成约15.5万人死亡和9380万人食源性疾病。在家禽中广泛使用抗生素来防治沙门氏菌病,导致对常用抗生素产生耐药性。方法。这项横断面研究于2023年1月至6月在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆地区的三个地区进行。采用标准的微生物学常规方法和PCR、基因组测序等分子方法对分离的沙门氏菌进行检测和鉴定。采用PCR检测invA基因的存在,并进行部分DNA测序,以确定物种及其近亲关系。采用Kirby-Bauer圆盘扩散法评价沙门氏菌对氨苄西林、阿奇霉素、氯霉素、环丙沙星、庆大霉素、甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑和四环素7种常用抗生素的敏感性。以参考编号为ATCC 8739的沙门氏菌为对照。结果。从粪便中分离的沙门氏菌总数为6.04% (n=796)。在pcr确认的分离株中,64.3% (n=28)对两类以上抗生素耐药,因此被认为具有多重耐药。耐药最高的是氨苄西林(92.9%,n=26),其次是四环素(71.43%,n=20)、环丙沙星(42.9%,n=12)、磺胺(42.85%,n=12)、庆大霉素(35.7%,n=10)和阿奇霉素(28.9%,n=8)。所有菌株均对氯霉素敏感(100%,n=28)。对28株分离株进行测序,其中16个序列(OR021717-OR021739)符合系统发育分析标准。所有16个序列均与中国分离的Senftenberg沙门氏菌EU348369株、Newport沙门氏菌OL581594株和Pullorum沙门氏菌EU348368株具有100%的同源性。其他序列分化得更远;这些是Abony沙门氏菌,编号为CP007541,肯塔基沙门氏菌,编号为OL581592。该树还包括一个外群物种,沙门氏菌bongori,它从GenBank下载,登录号为NC015761和NC021870 S. bongori。结论。本研究中发现的高水平抗生素耐药性可能是由于家禽管理中滥用抗生素,和/或可能是环境中存在耐药沙门氏菌菌株。为扭转已观察到的趋势,需要立即采取干预措施,例如通过加强对家禽养殖户的推广服务,倡导在家禽生产系统中谨慎使用抗生素,并使用农民田间学校模式,通过改善农场生物安全来改善家禽管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信