Age, Neuroticism, and Stressor-Related Negative Affect: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence from a Measurement Burst Study.

Giselle A Ferguson, Daisy V Zavala, Samantha Corley, Andreas B Neubauer, Daniel K Mroczek, Eileen Graham, Jacqueline A Mogle, Stacey B Scott
{"title":"Age, Neuroticism, and Stressor-Related Negative Affect: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence from a Measurement Burst Study.","authors":"Giselle A Ferguson, Daisy V Zavala, Samantha Corley, Andreas B Neubauer, Daniel K Mroczek, Eileen Graham, Jacqueline A Mogle, Stacey B Scott","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbaf095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Some studies in lifespan samples show that neuroticism is associated with larger increases in negative affect (NA) with stressor exposure, whereas older age is associated with smaller differences held within older adulthood and within individuals, longitudinally. In a sample of adults over age 70, the present study (1) examined whether the relationship between stressor exposure and NA was moderated by neuroticism and (2) tested cross-sectional age differences and longitudinal aging-related change in the stressor-NA slope.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pre-registered secondary analysis draws from three ecological momentary assessment measurement bursts over three years collected in Bronx, New York, USA. Participants (N = 318; Mage = 76.98) reported trait neuroticism at baseline, recent stressor exposure, and momentary NA five times daily for each 16-day burst.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using four-level multilevel models, we found positive within- (momentary: B = 6.88, SE = 0.44; day: B = 5.79, SE = 0.38) and between-person effects of stressor exposure (B = 19.21, SE = 3.53) on NA. Greater neuroticism was associated with higher average NA across the study (B = 4.32, SE = 1.06). Contrary to findings in younger and lifespan samples, neuroticism did not moderate the stressor-NA slope. Neither cross-sectional age differences nor longitudinal change were found in the stressor-NA slope, but longitudinal increases in average NA were observed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Together, these findings suggest that there are conditions when older age does not produce better emotion regulation, and that other characteristics besides neuroticism may underlie differences in stressor-related NA in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":520811,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Some studies in lifespan samples show that neuroticism is associated with larger increases in negative affect (NA) with stressor exposure, whereas older age is associated with smaller differences held within older adulthood and within individuals, longitudinally. In a sample of adults over age 70, the present study (1) examined whether the relationship between stressor exposure and NA was moderated by neuroticism and (2) tested cross-sectional age differences and longitudinal aging-related change in the stressor-NA slope.

Methods: This pre-registered secondary analysis draws from three ecological momentary assessment measurement bursts over three years collected in Bronx, New York, USA. Participants (N = 318; Mage = 76.98) reported trait neuroticism at baseline, recent stressor exposure, and momentary NA five times daily for each 16-day burst.

Results: Using four-level multilevel models, we found positive within- (momentary: B = 6.88, SE = 0.44; day: B = 5.79, SE = 0.38) and between-person effects of stressor exposure (B = 19.21, SE = 3.53) on NA. Greater neuroticism was associated with higher average NA across the study (B = 4.32, SE = 1.06). Contrary to findings in younger and lifespan samples, neuroticism did not moderate the stressor-NA slope. Neither cross-sectional age differences nor longitudinal change were found in the stressor-NA slope, but longitudinal increases in average NA were observed.

Discussion: Together, these findings suggest that there are conditions when older age does not produce better emotion regulation, and that other characteristics besides neuroticism may underlie differences in stressor-related NA in older adults.

年龄、神经质和压力相关的负面影响:来自测量突发研究的横断面和纵向证据。
目的:一些对寿命样本的研究表明,神经质与压力源暴露的负面情绪(NA)的较大增加有关,而年龄越大,在老年期和个体内部的差异就越小。在70岁以上的成年人样本中,本研究(1)检验了应激源暴露与NA之间的关系是否被神经质所调节;(2)测试了应激源-NA斜率的横断面年龄差异和纵向年龄相关变化。方法:这项预登记的二次分析来自美国纽约布朗克斯三年来收集的三次生态瞬时评估测量爆发。参与者(N = 318;法师= 76.98)报告了基线时的特征神经质,最近的应激源暴露,以及每16天爆发每天5次的瞬时NA。结果:采用四水平多水平模型,我们发现-(瞬时:B = 6.88, SE = 0.44;B = 5.79, SE = 0.38)和应激源暴露对NA的人际效应(B = 19.21, SE = 3.53)。在整个研究中,更大的神经质与更高的平均NA相关(B = 4.32, SE = 1.06)。与年轻和终身样本的研究结果相反,神经质并没有调节应激因子- na斜率。应力因子-NA斜率在横断面上没有年龄差异,在纵向上也没有变化,但在纵向上平均NA有所增加。讨论:综上所述,这些发现表明,在某些情况下,老年人的情绪调节能力并没有提高,除了神经质之外,其他特征可能是老年人压力相关NA差异的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信