Favorable Vessel Patency Following Carotid Artery Reconstruction During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Decannulation in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.

Ariya Chau, Shiraz A Maskatia, Basma Albuliwi, Elisabeth Martin, Kathleen R Ryan
{"title":"Favorable Vessel Patency Following Carotid Artery Reconstruction During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Decannulation in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.","authors":"Ariya Chau, Shiraz A Maskatia, Basma Albuliwi, Elisabeth Martin, Kathleen R Ryan","doi":"10.1177/21501351251338830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCarotid artery ligation has been a common practice after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decannulation due to the risks of embolization, cerebral infarction, aneurysm, and stenosis over time. Carotid artery reconstruction (CAR) after ECMO decannulation is increasingly used, though studies report variable stenosis rates. Data on CAR in children with heart disease, who may require carotid artery patency for future surgery or repeat ECMO, are lacking.ObjectiveTo evaluate carotid artery patency and the incidence of cerebral infarction in pediatric cardiac patients after CAR and ECMO decannulation.MethodsA retrospective review of children (0-21 years of age) who required venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) via neck cannulation in the cardiovascular intensive care unit at a quaternary children's hospital (2015-2022) was conducted. Children who underwent CAR and survived to discharge were included.ResultsFifty-three children (ages 2 days to 21 years, median, 2 years of age) met the study criteria. Carotid artery imaging was performed in 25 children (47%), with 84% (21/25) showing unobstructed arteries. Imaging follow-up ranged from two days to four years, with a median of three months. Of 33 children who had post-ECMO head imaging, 11 showed new cerebral infarcts, with 4 of those infarcts diagnosed following transition to ventricular assist device (VAD). Given the variability of timing and modality of head imaging and the significant proportion of patients on a VAD, we are unable to determine the true incidence of new infarcts following CAR.ConclusionCarotid artery reconstruction after VA-ECMO decannulation in children with congenital heart disease shows early favorable vessel patency, but the long-term neurological benefits compared with ligation remain unclear. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate long-term patency and neurological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94270,"journal":{"name":"World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery","volume":" ","pages":"21501351251338830"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501351251338830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundCarotid artery ligation has been a common practice after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decannulation due to the risks of embolization, cerebral infarction, aneurysm, and stenosis over time. Carotid artery reconstruction (CAR) after ECMO decannulation is increasingly used, though studies report variable stenosis rates. Data on CAR in children with heart disease, who may require carotid artery patency for future surgery or repeat ECMO, are lacking.ObjectiveTo evaluate carotid artery patency and the incidence of cerebral infarction in pediatric cardiac patients after CAR and ECMO decannulation.MethodsA retrospective review of children (0-21 years of age) who required venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) via neck cannulation in the cardiovascular intensive care unit at a quaternary children's hospital (2015-2022) was conducted. Children who underwent CAR and survived to discharge were included.ResultsFifty-three children (ages 2 days to 21 years, median, 2 years of age) met the study criteria. Carotid artery imaging was performed in 25 children (47%), with 84% (21/25) showing unobstructed arteries. Imaging follow-up ranged from two days to four years, with a median of three months. Of 33 children who had post-ECMO head imaging, 11 showed new cerebral infarcts, with 4 of those infarcts diagnosed following transition to ventricular assist device (VAD). Given the variability of timing and modality of head imaging and the significant proportion of patients on a VAD, we are unable to determine the true incidence of new infarcts following CAR.ConclusionCarotid artery reconstruction after VA-ECMO decannulation in children with congenital heart disease shows early favorable vessel patency, but the long-term neurological benefits compared with ligation remain unclear. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate long-term patency and neurological outcomes.

先天性心脏病患儿体外膜氧合脱管术中颈动脉重建后血管通畅。
背景:由于栓塞、脑梗死、动脉瘤和狭窄的风险,体外膜氧合(ECMO)脱管后颈动脉结扎一直是一种常见的做法。颈动脉重建(CAR)在ECMO脱管后越来越多地使用,尽管研究报告了不同的狭窄率。对于患有心脏病的儿童,在未来手术或重复ECMO时可能需要开放颈动脉,目前缺乏CAR的数据。目的评价小儿心脏患者CAR和ECMO脱管后颈动脉通畅程度及脑梗死发生率。方法回顾性分析某第四儿童医院心血管重症监护室2015-2022年通过颈部插管进行静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)治疗的0 ~ 21岁儿童。接受CAR治疗并存活至出院的儿童也包括在内。结果53例儿童(2天至21岁,中位年龄2岁)符合研究标准。25例(47%)儿童进行颈动脉造影,其中84%(21/25)显示动脉通畅。影像学随访从2天到4年不等,中位随访时间为3个月。在33名接受ecmo后头部成像的儿童中,11名显示新的脑梗死,其中4名在过渡到心室辅助装置(VAD)后诊断为脑梗死。考虑到头部成像时间和方式的可变性以及VAD患者的显著比例,我们无法确定CAR后新梗死的真实发生率。结论先天性心脏病患儿VA-ECMO脱管后颈动脉重建早期血管通畅,但与结扎相比,其长期神经学益处尚不清楚。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来评估长期通畅和神经预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信