Olivia B Ogilvy Dunstan, Leila Shafiee Hanjani, Francisca Rodriguez, Veronica Garcia-Hansen, Ruth E Hubbard, Adrienne Young, Claire M Ellender
{"title":"Scoping review of the measurement of care environment factors that impact sleep in the rehabilitation, subacute, and aged care settings.","authors":"Olivia B Ogilvy Dunstan, Leila Shafiee Hanjani, Francisca Rodriguez, Veronica Garcia-Hansen, Ruth E Hubbard, Adrienne Young, Claire M Ellender","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpaf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Unfamiliar environments are often poorly conducive to quality sleep, especially for patients within health and aged care settings. This scoping review aims to map available evidence regarding the sleep environment in rehabilitation, subacute, and aged care settings. It examines how these factors are measured and seeks to identify any reported standard metrics, guidelines, or methodologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted within PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from database inception to May 2023. Eligibility criteria included original studies of any design reporting on the measurement properties of care environment factors affecting the sleep of adult patients admitted to rehabilitation, subacute wards, and aged care facilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four studies were reviewed that included 5055 participants, mostly (78.4%, 58/74) from aged care facilities. From 102 identified care environment factors, the spectral measurements of light were most reported (65.7%, 67/102), with methodologies varying from actigraphy and illuminance meters to pendant-style light monitors. Other environmental factors (sound, temperature, and air quality/humidity), room characteristics (mattress/bedding, room cohabitation), and hospital functioning (imposed schedules) were measured considerably less often and displayed similar variations in reported units and devices. Eighteen studies reported international, national, and methodological standards or guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review provides a comprehensive overview of the care environment factors affecting sleep studied within rehabilitation, subacute, and aged care settings. Various units and devices were used in measuring these factors, and standard metrics and methodology were not consistently used. Future care environment studies incorporating interventions that employ standardized devices, units, and methodologies, will thereby enhance the reliability and comparability of findings within this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":"6 2","pages":"zpaf011"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpaf011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objectives: Unfamiliar environments are often poorly conducive to quality sleep, especially for patients within health and aged care settings. This scoping review aims to map available evidence regarding the sleep environment in rehabilitation, subacute, and aged care settings. It examines how these factors are measured and seeks to identify any reported standard metrics, guidelines, or methodologies.
Methods: Searches were conducted within PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from database inception to May 2023. Eligibility criteria included original studies of any design reporting on the measurement properties of care environment factors affecting the sleep of adult patients admitted to rehabilitation, subacute wards, and aged care facilities.
Results: Seventy-four studies were reviewed that included 5055 participants, mostly (78.4%, 58/74) from aged care facilities. From 102 identified care environment factors, the spectral measurements of light were most reported (65.7%, 67/102), with methodologies varying from actigraphy and illuminance meters to pendant-style light monitors. Other environmental factors (sound, temperature, and air quality/humidity), room characteristics (mattress/bedding, room cohabitation), and hospital functioning (imposed schedules) were measured considerably less often and displayed similar variations in reported units and devices. Eighteen studies reported international, national, and methodological standards or guidelines.
Conclusions: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the care environment factors affecting sleep studied within rehabilitation, subacute, and aged care settings. Various units and devices were used in measuring these factors, and standard metrics and methodology were not consistently used. Future care environment studies incorporating interventions that employ standardized devices, units, and methodologies, will thereby enhance the reliability and comparability of findings within this field.
研究目的:不熟悉的环境往往不利于高质量的睡眠,特别是对于健康和老年护理机构的患者。本综述的目的是绘制关于康复、亚急性和老年护理环境中睡眠环境的现有证据。它检查了这些因素是如何测量的,并试图确定任何报告的标准度量、指导方针或方法。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、护理与相关健康文献累积索引、PsycINFO和Web of Science自数据库建立至2023年5月。入选标准包括对康复病房、亚急性病房和老年护理机构的成年患者睡眠影响的护理环境因素测量特性的任何设计报告的原始研究。结果:我们回顾了74项研究,包括5055名参与者,其中大多数(78.4%,58/74)来自老年护理机构。在102个确定的护理环境因素中,光谱测量光的报道最多(65.7%,67/102),方法从活动记录仪和照度计到挂式光监测仪不等。其他环境因素(声音、温度和空气质量/湿度)、房间特征(床垫/床上用品、房间同居)和医院功能(强制时间表)的测量频率要低得多,并且在报告的单位和设备中显示出类似的变化。18项研究报告了国际、国家和方法标准或指南。结论:本综述对康复、亚急性和老年护理环境中影响睡眠的护理环境因素进行了全面概述。在测量这些因素时使用了各种单位和设备,标准度量和方法并未一致使用。未来的护理环境研究纳入采用标准化设备、单位和方法的干预措施,从而提高该领域研究结果的可靠性和可比性。