Continuous theta burst stimulation in the treatment of epilepsia partialis continua: a case series.

Chloé Algoet, Sofie Carrette, Alfred Meurs, Ann Mertens, Dimitri Hemelsoet, Paul Boon, Kristl Vonck
{"title":"Continuous theta burst stimulation in the treatment of epilepsia partialis continua: a case series.","authors":"Chloé Algoet, Sofie Carrette, Alfred Meurs, Ann Mertens, Dimitri Hemelsoet, Paul Boon, Kristl Vonck","doi":"10.1186/s42234-025-00175-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) is a medication-resistant form of focal status epilepticus (SE), causing significant morbidity. This case series explored whether continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) could reduce seizure activity in patients with EPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three patients with motor EPC (2M/1F) underwent an accelerated cTBS protocol over four consecutive days (five 40-s trains/day, 5Hz bursts, 3 pulses at 50Hz/burst). Stimulation targeted the epileptogenic zone using a figure-of-eight coil at 80% of the resting motor threshold. Electroencephalography (EEG) was conducted before and after each session. Seizure frequency, intensity, adverse events (AEs), seizure diaries, and follow-up data were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>cTBS did not interrupt EPC in any patient. One patient reported a 17% reduction in seizure frequency. Another noted mild improvement in shoulder jerks, and a third reported reduced arm tension, though without clinical confirmation. EEG showed no significant changes. One patient experienced seizures during stimulation, and another reported worsening of pre-existing headaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this small case series, a four-day accelerated cTBS protocol did not yield clinically meaningful seizure control in EPC. Further research is needed to evaluate TMS and TBS in SE and EPC, where a significant treatment gap remains.</p>","PeriodicalId":72363,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectronic medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectronic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-025-00175-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) is a medication-resistant form of focal status epilepticus (SE), causing significant morbidity. This case series explored whether continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) could reduce seizure activity in patients with EPC.

Methods: Three patients with motor EPC (2M/1F) underwent an accelerated cTBS protocol over four consecutive days (five 40-s trains/day, 5Hz bursts, 3 pulses at 50Hz/burst). Stimulation targeted the epileptogenic zone using a figure-of-eight coil at 80% of the resting motor threshold. Electroencephalography (EEG) was conducted before and after each session. Seizure frequency, intensity, adverse events (AEs), seizure diaries, and follow-up data were assessed.

Results: cTBS did not interrupt EPC in any patient. One patient reported a 17% reduction in seizure frequency. Another noted mild improvement in shoulder jerks, and a third reported reduced arm tension, though without clinical confirmation. EEG showed no significant changes. One patient experienced seizures during stimulation, and another reported worsening of pre-existing headaches.

Conclusion: In this small case series, a four-day accelerated cTBS protocol did not yield clinically meaningful seizure control in EPC. Further research is needed to evaluate TMS and TBS in SE and EPC, where a significant treatment gap remains.

连续θ波爆发刺激治疗局部连续性癫痫:一个病例系列。
背景:局部持续性癫痫(EPC)是局灶性癫痫持续状态(SE)的一种耐药形式,发病率很高。本病例系列探讨了持续的θ波爆发刺激(cTBS)是否可以降低EPC患者的癫痫发作活动。方法:3例运动性EPC (2M/1F)患者连续4天接受加速cTBS治疗(5次40-s训练/天,5Hz脉冲,3次50Hz脉冲)。在静息运动阈值的80%处使用八字线圈刺激致痫区。每次治疗前后分别进行脑电图(EEG)检查。评估癫痫发作频率、强度、不良事件(ae)、癫痫发作日记和随访数据。结果:cTBS未中断任何患者的EPC。一名患者报告癫痫发作频率降低了17%。另一名患者指出肩部抽搐有轻微改善,第三名患者报告手臂紧张有所减轻,但没有得到临床证实。脑电图无明显变化。一名患者在刺激期间出现癫痫发作,另一名患者报告先前存在的头痛恶化。结论:在这个小病例系列中,为期四天的加速cTBS方案并没有产生具有临床意义的癫痫发作控制。需要进一步的研究来评估TMS和TBS在SE和EPC的治疗差距仍然很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信