Assessing childhood maltreatment exposure using the child behavior checklist.

Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-05-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frcha.2025.1493432
Takuya Makino, Shota Nishitani, Shinichiro Takiguchi, Akiko Yao, Takashi X Fujisawa, Akemi Tomoda
{"title":"Assessing childhood maltreatment exposure using the child behavior checklist.","authors":"Takuya Makino, Shota Nishitani, Shinichiro Takiguchi, Akiko Yao, Takashi X Fujisawa, Akemi Tomoda","doi":"10.3389/frcha.2025.1493432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Childhood maltreatment (CM) has broad and severe adverse effects in later life, but there are not enough studies conducted during childhood close to the time of maltreatment. Most studies have focused only on a single symptom and have not attempted to capture the global picture of CM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) to assess children's behavioral/emotional problems more comprehensively. This study leveraged 32 CM children and 29 typically developing (TD) children who have been assessed using the CBCL 4-18 from our dataset. Group comparisons of the eight subscales were conducted to characterize each behavioral/emotional problem. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the classification performance. Finally, sensitive period and type analyses were performed based on the children's maltreatment history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CM group showed significantly higher behavioral/emotional problems in seven out of the eight subscales. Logistic regression analysis was performed using all combinations of CBCL subscale T-scores and age, sex, and IQ. We created 2047 models and performed ROC analysis for each. Three models were generated: the most accurate model (comprising CBCL T-score, age, sex, and IQ; sensitivity: 0.906, specificity: 0.966), a model excluding IQ (sensitivity: 0.875, specificity: 0.931), and a model consisting only of CBCL (sensitivity: 0.906, specificity: 0.862). The CBCL demonstrated robust predictive capacity for CM by utilizing information provided by caregivers, without directly inquiring about trauma. The sensitive period analysis revealed that the temporal predictor of severity for \"withdrawn\" and \"thought problems\" were exposure to CM at age five. Similarly, exposure to CM between the ages of five and seven predicted \"somatic complaints\". In the case of type, physical abuse was the predictor for \"somatic complaints\" and \"delinquent behavior\", and emotional abuse was the predictor for \"anxious/depressed\" and \"thought problems\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maltreated children present a wider range of behavioral/emotional problems, which must be considered when supporting them. Perspectives gained from sensitive analyses of maltreatment history will help clinicians provide more appropriate interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73074,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","volume":"4 ","pages":"1493432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2025.1493432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Childhood maltreatment (CM) has broad and severe adverse effects in later life, but there are not enough studies conducted during childhood close to the time of maltreatment. Most studies have focused only on a single symptom and have not attempted to capture the global picture of CM.

Methods: We used the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) to assess children's behavioral/emotional problems more comprehensively. This study leveraged 32 CM children and 29 typically developing (TD) children who have been assessed using the CBCL 4-18 from our dataset. Group comparisons of the eight subscales were conducted to characterize each behavioral/emotional problem. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the classification performance. Finally, sensitive period and type analyses were performed based on the children's maltreatment history.

Results: The CM group showed significantly higher behavioral/emotional problems in seven out of the eight subscales. Logistic regression analysis was performed using all combinations of CBCL subscale T-scores and age, sex, and IQ. We created 2047 models and performed ROC analysis for each. Three models were generated: the most accurate model (comprising CBCL T-score, age, sex, and IQ; sensitivity: 0.906, specificity: 0.966), a model excluding IQ (sensitivity: 0.875, specificity: 0.931), and a model consisting only of CBCL (sensitivity: 0.906, specificity: 0.862). The CBCL demonstrated robust predictive capacity for CM by utilizing information provided by caregivers, without directly inquiring about trauma. The sensitive period analysis revealed that the temporal predictor of severity for "withdrawn" and "thought problems" were exposure to CM at age five. Similarly, exposure to CM between the ages of five and seven predicted "somatic complaints". In the case of type, physical abuse was the predictor for "somatic complaints" and "delinquent behavior", and emotional abuse was the predictor for "anxious/depressed" and "thought problems".

Conclusion: Maltreated children present a wider range of behavioral/emotional problems, which must be considered when supporting them. Perspectives gained from sensitive analyses of maltreatment history will help clinicians provide more appropriate interventions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用儿童行为检查表评估儿童虐待暴露。
儿童虐待在以后的生活中具有广泛和严重的不良影响,但在接近虐待时间的儿童时期进行的研究还不够。大多数研究只集中在一个单一的症状,并没有试图捕捉CM的全局图片。方法:采用儿童行为量表(Child Behavior Checklist, CBCL)对儿童的行为/情绪问题进行更全面的评估。本研究使用数据集中的CBCL 4-18对32名CM儿童和29名典型发育(TD)儿童进行了评估。对八个分量表进行分组比较,以表征每个行为/情绪问题。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评价分类效果。最后,根据儿童虐待史进行敏感期和类型分析。结果:CM组在8个量表中的7个量表中表现出明显较高的行为/情绪问题。使用CBCL子量表t得分与年龄、性别和智商的所有组合进行Logistic回归分析。我们建立了2047个模型,并对每个模型进行了ROC分析。生成了三个模型:最准确的模型(包括CBCL T-score、年龄、性别和智商);敏感度:0.906,特异度:0.966)、不含IQ的模型(敏感度:0.875,特异度:0.931)和仅含CBCL的模型(敏感度:0.906,特异度:0.862)。CBCL通过利用护理人员提供的信息,而无需直接询问创伤,显示出对CM的强大预测能力。敏感期分析显示,“孤僻”和“思维问题”严重程度的时间预测因子是5岁时接触CM。同样,在5到7岁之间接触CM可以预测“躯体疾病”。在类型的情况下,身体虐待是“躯体抱怨”和“犯罪行为”的预测因子,情感虐待是“焦虑/抑郁”和“思想问题”的预测因子。结论:受虐待儿童表现出更广泛的行为/情绪问题,在支持他们时必须考虑到这一点。从对虐待史的敏感分析中获得的观点将帮助临床医生提供更适当的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信