Donor Variability and 3D Culture Models Influence Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Sarah Jones, Michelle Tai, Manish Ayushman, Abena Peasah, Julia Johannsen, Fan Yang
{"title":"Donor Variability and 3D Culture Models Influence Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation.","authors":"Sarah Jones, Michelle Tai, Manish Ayushman, Abena Peasah, Julia Johannsen, Fan Yang","doi":"10.1089/ten.tea.2025.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely used for tissue regeneration due to their multilineage differentiation potential and ability to secrete paracrine factors with immunomodulatory and angiogenic functions. Standard MSC differentiation protocols typically rely on two-dimensional (2D) or pellet culture models that are simple to use but not well-suited for translational or clinical applications. To promote better cell survival, tissue deposition, and differentiation of MSCs, a wide variety of three-dimensional (3D) biomaterial scaffolds and platforms have been developed that provide structural support and present a carefully defined set of biochemical and biophysical cues to cells. While biomaterials can guide cell behavior and promote desirable tissue regeneration outcomes, one remaining challenge in the field is inherent donor-to-donor variability in MSC behavior, phenotype, and differentiation capacity. Although MSCs are promising tools for regeneration, the influence of donor variability on MSC differentiation across culture models remains poorly understood. Previous studies typically use cells from a single donor or rely solely on standard culture models. To address these gaps, we compared MSCs from six human donors and assessed differentiation across chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic lineages using both standard (pellet or 2D) and 3D biomaterial-based culture models. Alginate hydrogels were used to assess chondrogenesis, while gelatin microribbon (µRB) hydrogels were used to evaluate osteogenesis and adipogenesis in 3D. Significant donor-to-donor variability was observed in differentiation outcomes across all three lineages and within both 2D and 3D culture models. By directly comparing donor variability in 2D and 3D, we provide evidence that standard 2D models cannot predict MSC differentiation capacity in 3D biomaterials. Therefore, to improve therapeutic efficacy and advance biomaterial-based strategies for tissue regeneration, it is critical to understand how donor variability affects MSC differentiation patterns across 3D biomaterial-based culture models.</p>","PeriodicalId":56375,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering Part A","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering Part A","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2025.0028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely used for tissue regeneration due to their multilineage differentiation potential and ability to secrete paracrine factors with immunomodulatory and angiogenic functions. Standard MSC differentiation protocols typically rely on two-dimensional (2D) or pellet culture models that are simple to use but not well-suited for translational or clinical applications. To promote better cell survival, tissue deposition, and differentiation of MSCs, a wide variety of three-dimensional (3D) biomaterial scaffolds and platforms have been developed that provide structural support and present a carefully defined set of biochemical and biophysical cues to cells. While biomaterials can guide cell behavior and promote desirable tissue regeneration outcomes, one remaining challenge in the field is inherent donor-to-donor variability in MSC behavior, phenotype, and differentiation capacity. Although MSCs are promising tools for regeneration, the influence of donor variability on MSC differentiation across culture models remains poorly understood. Previous studies typically use cells from a single donor or rely solely on standard culture models. To address these gaps, we compared MSCs from six human donors and assessed differentiation across chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic lineages using both standard (pellet or 2D) and 3D biomaterial-based culture models. Alginate hydrogels were used to assess chondrogenesis, while gelatin microribbon (µRB) hydrogels were used to evaluate osteogenesis and adipogenesis in 3D. Significant donor-to-donor variability was observed in differentiation outcomes across all three lineages and within both 2D and 3D culture models. By directly comparing donor variability in 2D and 3D, we provide evidence that standard 2D models cannot predict MSC differentiation capacity in 3D biomaterials. Therefore, to improve therapeutic efficacy and advance biomaterial-based strategies for tissue regeneration, it is critical to understand how donor variability affects MSC differentiation patterns across 3D biomaterial-based culture models.

供体变异和3D培养模型影响人间充质干细胞分化。
间充质干细胞(MSCs)因其具有多系分化潜能和分泌具有免疫调节和血管生成功能的旁分泌因子的能力而被广泛应用于组织再生。标准的MSC分化方案通常依赖于二维(2D)或颗粒培养模型,这些模型使用简单,但不适合翻译或临床应用。为了促进间质干细胞更好的细胞存活、组织沉积和分化,各种各样的三维(3D)生物材料支架和平台已经被开发出来,它们提供了结构支持,并为细胞提供了一套精心定义的生化和生物物理线索。虽然生物材料可以引导细胞行为并促进理想的组织再生结果,但该领域仍然存在一个挑战,即骨髓间充质干细胞行为、表型和分化能力固有的供体间差异性。尽管间充质干细胞是很有前途的再生工具,但供体变异对间充质干细胞在培养模型中的分化的影响仍然知之甚少。以前的研究通常使用来自单个供体的细胞或仅依赖标准培养模型。为了解决这些差距,我们比较了来自六个人类供体的间充质干细胞,并使用标准(颗粒或2D)和3D生物材料培养模型评估了软骨、成骨和脂肪谱系的分化。海藻酸盐水凝胶用于评估软骨形成,明胶微带(µRB)水凝胶用于3D评估骨形成和脂肪形成。在所有三个谱系和2D和3D培养模型中,观察到显著的供体间差异。通过直接比较2D和3D的供体差异,我们提供了标准2D模型不能预测3D生物材料中MSC分化能力的证据。因此,为了提高治疗效果和推进基于生物材料的组织再生策略,了解供体变异如何影响基于3D生物材料的培养模型中的MSC分化模式至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering Part A
Tissue Engineering Part A Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering is the preeminent, biomedical journal advancing the field with cutting-edge research and applications that repair or regenerate portions or whole tissues. This multidisciplinary journal brings together the principles of engineering and life sciences in the creation of artificial tissues and regenerative medicine. Tissue Engineering is divided into three parts, providing a central forum for groundbreaking scientific research and developments of clinical applications from leading experts in the field that will enable the functional replacement of tissues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信