{"title":"Utility of the Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment for Prognostication in Leptomeningeal Disease.","authors":"Meghana Kesireddy, Rosalyn Marar, Kaeli Samson, Nicole Shonka","doi":"10.46883/2025.25921040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is the spread of cancer cells to the arachnoid mater, pia mater, and cerebrospinal fluid. It occurs in 5% to 10% of solid organ cancers, with higher rates in breast, lung, and melanoma cancers. The prognosis for patients with LMD remains poor, with a median survival of 1.5 months without treatment and 2 to 3 months with treatment, despite advances in cancer treatment. This retrospective study included 64 patients with LMD with primary cancers represented in the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) at a single institution over 5 years. Patient characteristics, treatment, and overall survival (OS) data were collected. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards regression models. The median OS for the 64 patients with LMD was 2.6 months, with no statistically significant differences among cancer types. Though not statistically significant, those with higher DS-GPA scores trended toward longer survival in breast and lung cancer cohorts. Patients with LMD on imaging confined to 1 location (cerebrum, cerebellum, spine, or cranial nerves) and receiving systemic chemotherapy alone also had longer survival. The DS-GPA tool is promising for LMD prognostication and may be strengthened by incorporating imaging and chemotherapy characteristics. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to validate its prognostic utility. Keywords: Leptomeningeal disease, diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment, prognosis, overall survival, breast cancer, lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":51147,"journal":{"name":"Oncology-New York","volume":"39 4","pages":"141-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology-New York","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46883/2025.25921040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is the spread of cancer cells to the arachnoid mater, pia mater, and cerebrospinal fluid. It occurs in 5% to 10% of solid organ cancers, with higher rates in breast, lung, and melanoma cancers. The prognosis for patients with LMD remains poor, with a median survival of 1.5 months without treatment and 2 to 3 months with treatment, despite advances in cancer treatment. This retrospective study included 64 patients with LMD with primary cancers represented in the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) at a single institution over 5 years. Patient characteristics, treatment, and overall survival (OS) data were collected. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards regression models. The median OS for the 64 patients with LMD was 2.6 months, with no statistically significant differences among cancer types. Though not statistically significant, those with higher DS-GPA scores trended toward longer survival in breast and lung cancer cohorts. Patients with LMD on imaging confined to 1 location (cerebrum, cerebellum, spine, or cranial nerves) and receiving systemic chemotherapy alone also had longer survival. The DS-GPA tool is promising for LMD prognostication and may be strengthened by incorporating imaging and chemotherapy characteristics. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to validate its prognostic utility. Keywords: Leptomeningeal disease, diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment, prognosis, overall survival, breast cancer, lung cancer.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.