Unpacking the link between hormonal fluctuations and risk-taking: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Bo Yuan , Dongyu Gao , Rongjun Yu , Yi Huang
{"title":"Unpacking the link between hormonal fluctuations and risk-taking: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Bo Yuan ,&nbsp;Dongyu Gao ,&nbsp;Rongjun Yu ,&nbsp;Yi Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have suggested that hormonal fluctuations, specifically in testosterone, estradiol, and cortisol, may impact reward-related brain functioning and risk-taking behaviors. However, findings in this area have been inconsistent and sometimes contradictory. The current study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of both endogenous and exogenous testosterone, estradiol, and cortisol on risk-taking behaviors, as well as identify potential moderators of these effects. This meta-analysis systematically reviewed studies published up to February 20, 2025, encompassing both correlational and experimental designs. After screening 2544 records, 98 studies met inclusion criteria, yielding 162 effect sizes involving 8676 participants for testosterone, 55 effect sizes from 2510 participants for estradiol, and 66 effect sizes from 3933 participants for cortisol. Using the random-effects Bayesian meta-analytic models, our results showed that both testosterone and estradiol had a significant, albeit modest, effect on increasing risk-taking behaviors (testosterone: Hedge’s <em>g</em> = 0.22; 95 % CrI [0.14, 0.30]; estradiol: Hedge’s <em>g</em> = 0.20; 95 % CrI [0.03, 0.37]). However, cortisol was not associated with changes in risk-taking (Hedge’s <em>g</em> = −0.04; 95 % CrI [−0.17, 0.09]). Further analysis indicated that the effects of testosterone were moderated by the study design (experimental vs. correlational), the behavior type (sensation seeking vs. risk-taking vs. impulsivity), the measurement type of risky behavior (self-report vs. behavioral) and the measurement type of hormone (saliva vs. serum), but these moderators had no significant impact on the estradiol effect. Despite the potential for publication bias, no evidence of selective reporting (e.g. <em>p</em>-hacking) was found in the <em>p</em>-curve analysis. In summary, testosterone and estradiol may influence risk-taking behaviors, although further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 106215"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425002155","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that hormonal fluctuations, specifically in testosterone, estradiol, and cortisol, may impact reward-related brain functioning and risk-taking behaviors. However, findings in this area have been inconsistent and sometimes contradictory. The current study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of both endogenous and exogenous testosterone, estradiol, and cortisol on risk-taking behaviors, as well as identify potential moderators of these effects. This meta-analysis systematically reviewed studies published up to February 20, 2025, encompassing both correlational and experimental designs. After screening 2544 records, 98 studies met inclusion criteria, yielding 162 effect sizes involving 8676 participants for testosterone, 55 effect sizes from 2510 participants for estradiol, and 66 effect sizes from 3933 participants for cortisol. Using the random-effects Bayesian meta-analytic models, our results showed that both testosterone and estradiol had a significant, albeit modest, effect on increasing risk-taking behaviors (testosterone: Hedge’s g = 0.22; 95 % CrI [0.14, 0.30]; estradiol: Hedge’s g = 0.20; 95 % CrI [0.03, 0.37]). However, cortisol was not associated with changes in risk-taking (Hedge’s g = −0.04; 95 % CrI [−0.17, 0.09]). Further analysis indicated that the effects of testosterone were moderated by the study design (experimental vs. correlational), the behavior type (sensation seeking vs. risk-taking vs. impulsivity), the measurement type of risky behavior (self-report vs. behavioral) and the measurement type of hormone (saliva vs. serum), but these moderators had no significant impact on the estradiol effect. Despite the potential for publication bias, no evidence of selective reporting (e.g. p-hacking) was found in the p-curve analysis. In summary, testosterone and estradiol may influence risk-taking behaviors, although further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm these findings.
解开荷尔蒙波动与冒险之间的联系:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
先前的研究表明,激素波动,特别是睾酮、雌二醇和皮质醇的波动,可能会影响与奖励相关的大脑功能和冒险行为。然而,这一领域的研究结果并不一致,有时甚至相互矛盾。目前的研究旨在进行荟萃分析,以调查内源性和外源性睾酮、雌二醇和皮质醇对冒险行为的影响,并确定这些影响的潜在调节因子。本荟萃分析系统地回顾了截至2025年2月20日发表的研究,包括相关研究和实验设计。在筛选了2544项记录后,98项研究符合纳入标准,产生了162个效应量,涉及8,676名参与者的睾丸激素,55个效应量,涉及2,510名参与者的雌二醇,66个效应量,涉及3,933名参与者的皮质醇。使用随机效应贝叶斯元分析模型,我们的结果显示,睾酮和雌二醇对增加冒险行为有显著的影响,尽管影响不大(睾酮:Hedge’s g = 0.22;95% CrI [0.14, 0.30];雌二醇:Hedge’s g = 0.20;95% CrI[0.03, 0.37])。然而,皮质醇与冒险行为的变化无关(Hedge’s g = -0.04;95% CrI[-0.17, 0.09])。进一步的分析表明,睾酮的影响被研究设计(实验vs相关)、行为类型(感觉寻求vs冒险vs冲动)、危险行为的测量类型(自我报告vs行为)和激素的测量类型(唾液vs血清)所调节,但这些调节因子对雌二醇的影响没有显著影响。尽管可能存在发表偏倚,但在p曲线分析中没有发现选择性报道(例如p-hacking)的证据。总之,睾酮和雌二醇可能影响冒险行为,尽管需要进一步的大样本量随机对照试验(rct)来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信