Evaluation of the Effects of Two Different Types of Chirp Stimuli on Auditory Brainstem Response in Young Adults.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Ozgenur Gavgali, Burak Ozturk
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effects of Two Different Types of Chirp Stimuli on Auditory Brainstem Response in Young Adults.","authors":"Ozgenur Gavgali, Burak Ozturk","doi":"10.3766/jaaa.230114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The chirp stimulus is a type of stimulus designed to neutralize the lack of temporal synchronization in the cochlea caused by progressive wave delay. The CE-Chirp® stimulus is a modified form of the chirp stimulus that allows for better neural synchronization and the recording of larger amplitude responses.<b>Purpose:</b> This study compared wave V latencies and amplitudes of CE-Chirp and chirp stimuli in auditory evoked brainstem responses (ABRs).<b>Research Design:</b> This was a cross-sectional analytical research study.<b>Study Sample:</b> Data of 25 healthy individuals (15 female and 10 male individuals) between 20 and 26 years of age (22.84 ± 1.81 years) were included.<b>Data Collection and Analysis:</b> Pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, chirp ABR, and CE-Chirp ABR tests were applied. Chirp (broadband [BB] chirp [BB-chirp] and narrowband [NB] chirp [NB-chirp]) and CE-Chirp ABRs were evaluated at 20, 40, 60, and 80 decibels for normal hearing level (dBnHL) at BB and NB frequencies (1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz).<b>Results:</b> The BB frequency evaluation showed a significant difference between the BB-chirp stimulus and CE-Chirp stimulus in terms of latency (p = 0.01 at 20, 40, 60, and 80 dBnHL), but no significant difference in amplitude (p > 0.05 at 20, 40, 60, and 80 dBnHL). The comparison of the NB-chirp stimulus and CE-Chirp stimulus showed that CE-Chirp stimulus latencies were significantly shorter than chirp stimulus latencies when a high stimulus intensity was applied at NB frequencies.<b>Conclusions:</b> A comparison of chirp and CE-Chirp stimuli revealed a significant difference in latency at BB frequencies, but different results were observed at NB frequencies. Amplitude comparisons of stimuli revealed different findings at different frequencies and different stimulus intensities. Additional research is necessary to determine the latency and amplitude differences between chirp and CE-Chirp stimuli.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.230114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The chirp stimulus is a type of stimulus designed to neutralize the lack of temporal synchronization in the cochlea caused by progressive wave delay. The CE-Chirp® stimulus is a modified form of the chirp stimulus that allows for better neural synchronization and the recording of larger amplitude responses.Purpose: This study compared wave V latencies and amplitudes of CE-Chirp and chirp stimuli in auditory evoked brainstem responses (ABRs).Research Design: This was a cross-sectional analytical research study.Study Sample: Data of 25 healthy individuals (15 female and 10 male individuals) between 20 and 26 years of age (22.84 ± 1.81 years) were included.Data Collection and Analysis: Pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, chirp ABR, and CE-Chirp ABR tests were applied. Chirp (broadband [BB] chirp [BB-chirp] and narrowband [NB] chirp [NB-chirp]) and CE-Chirp ABRs were evaluated at 20, 40, 60, and 80 decibels for normal hearing level (dBnHL) at BB and NB frequencies (1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz).Results: The BB frequency evaluation showed a significant difference between the BB-chirp stimulus and CE-Chirp stimulus in terms of latency (p = 0.01 at 20, 40, 60, and 80 dBnHL), but no significant difference in amplitude (p > 0.05 at 20, 40, 60, and 80 dBnHL). The comparison of the NB-chirp stimulus and CE-Chirp stimulus showed that CE-Chirp stimulus latencies were significantly shorter than chirp stimulus latencies when a high stimulus intensity was applied at NB frequencies.Conclusions: A comparison of chirp and CE-Chirp stimuli revealed a significant difference in latency at BB frequencies, but different results were observed at NB frequencies. Amplitude comparisons of stimuli revealed different findings at different frequencies and different stimulus intensities. Additional research is necessary to determine the latency and amplitude differences between chirp and CE-Chirp stimuli.

两种不同类型的啁啾刺激对青少年听觉脑干反应的影响。
背景:啁啾刺激是一种旨在中和由进行性波延迟引起的耳蜗时间同步性缺失的刺激。CE-Chirp®刺激是chirp刺激的改进形式,允许更好的神经同步和更大振幅响应的记录。目的:比较CE-Chirp和chirp刺激在听觉诱发脑干反应(ABRs)中的波V潜伏期和振幅。研究设计:本研究为横断面分析性研究。研究样本:选取年龄在20 ~ 26岁(22.84±1.81岁)的健康个体25例(女性15例,男性10例)。数据收集和分析:采用纯音测听、鼓室测听、chirp ABR和CE-Chirp ABR测试。啁啾(宽带[BB]啁啾[BB- Chirp]和窄带[NB]啁啾[NB- Chirp])和ce -啁啾abr分别在BB和NB频率(1,000,2,000和4,000 Hz)下的正常听力水平(dBnHL)为20,40,60和80分贝。结果:BB频率评价显示BB-chirp刺激与CE-Chirp刺激在潜伏期上有显著差异(在20、40、60和80 dBnHL时p = 0.01),但在振幅上无显著差异(在20、40、60和80 dBnHL时p = 0.05)。NB-chirp刺激和CE-Chirp刺激的比较表明,在NB频率下施加高刺激强度时,CE-Chirp刺激潜伏期明显短于chirp刺激潜伏期。结论:啁啾和ce -啁啾刺激在BB频率下的潜伏期有显著差异,而在NB频率下观察到不同的结果。不同频率、不同刺激强度下的刺激振幅比较结果不同。需要进一步的研究来确定啁啾和ce -啁啾刺激之间的潜伏期和振幅差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信