Consensus-based dosage recommendations for sensorimotor training in the management of neck pain: a Delphi study.

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Kevin Hablützel, Heike Kubat
{"title":"Consensus-based dosage recommendations for sensorimotor training in the management of neck pain: a Delphi study.","authors":"Kevin Hablützel, Heike Kubat","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2025.2509549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neck pain is a common condition associated with high treatment costs, reduced productivity, and work limitations. It represents the second-largest group requiring physiotherapy services. Given its high prevalence, it is crucial to evaluate intervention effectiveness and ensure optimal implementation in practice. Literature highlights sensorimotor training (SMT) as an important approach in managing neck pain, though dosage recommendations for clinical application are only partially defined. This study aims to develop practical dosage guidelines for SMT in neck pain to support its implementation in daily physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi study was conducted. Based on literature and the expertise of 12 specialists from Switzerland and Germany, dosage recommendations were developed. Two questionnaire rounds were required to reach consensus (≥ 80%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the second round, 92-100% consensus was achieved on key aspects: targeted abilities, training cycle, frequency, training duration, number of exercises, sets per exercise, repetitions, time per exercise, and rest time. Additional background questions and comments contributed to a factsheet designed as a practical clinical guide. Recommended parameters include: training cycle of 4-12 weeks, 3-21 sessions/week, 10-20 minutes/session, 2-6 exercises/session, 2-5 sets/exercise, 7-15 repetitions or 20-60 seconds/exercise, and 20-40 seconds rest between sets. Further guidance is provided on targeted abilities, clinical indicators of positive effects, criteria for progression, and required adjustments for effective SMT.    .</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study closes a knowledge gap regarding SMT dosage. The resulting factsheet aims to simplify SMT implementation for neck pain and promote its integration in daily physiotherapy practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2509549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neck pain is a common condition associated with high treatment costs, reduced productivity, and work limitations. It represents the second-largest group requiring physiotherapy services. Given its high prevalence, it is crucial to evaluate intervention effectiveness and ensure optimal implementation in practice. Literature highlights sensorimotor training (SMT) as an important approach in managing neck pain, though dosage recommendations for clinical application are only partially defined. This study aims to develop practical dosage guidelines for SMT in neck pain to support its implementation in daily physiotherapy.

Methods: A Delphi study was conducted. Based on literature and the expertise of 12 specialists from Switzerland and Germany, dosage recommendations were developed. Two questionnaire rounds were required to reach consensus (≥ 80%).

Results: After the second round, 92-100% consensus was achieved on key aspects: targeted abilities, training cycle, frequency, training duration, number of exercises, sets per exercise, repetitions, time per exercise, and rest time. Additional background questions and comments contributed to a factsheet designed as a practical clinical guide. Recommended parameters include: training cycle of 4-12 weeks, 3-21 sessions/week, 10-20 minutes/session, 2-6 exercises/session, 2-5 sets/exercise, 7-15 repetitions or 20-60 seconds/exercise, and 20-40 seconds rest between sets. Further guidance is provided on targeted abilities, clinical indicators of positive effects, criteria for progression, and required adjustments for effective SMT.    .

Conclusion: This study closes a knowledge gap regarding SMT dosage. The resulting factsheet aims to simplify SMT implementation for neck pain and promote its integration in daily physiotherapy practice.

基于共识的剂量建议的感觉运动训练在管理颈部疼痛:德尔菲研究。
颈部疼痛是一种常见的疾病,与高治疗费用、生产力下降和工作限制有关。它代表了第二大需要物理治疗服务的群体。鉴于其高患病率,评估干预效果并确保在实践中最佳实施至关重要。文献强调感觉运动训练(SMT)是治疗颈部疼痛的重要方法,尽管临床应用的剂量建议仅部分定义。本研究旨在制定SMT治疗颈部疼痛的实用剂量指南,以支持其在日常物理治疗中的实施。方法:采用德尔菲法。根据文献和来自瑞士和德国的12名专家的专业知识,制定了剂量建议。需要两轮问卷才能达成共识(≥80%)。结果:第二轮后,在目标能力、训练周期、频率、训练持续时间、练习次数、每组数、重复次数、每组时间、休息时间等关键方面达成了92% -100%的共识。额外的背景问题和评论有助于一份作为实用临床指南的概况介绍。建议的参数包括:训练周期为4-12周,3-21次/周,10-20分钟/次,2-6次/次,2-5组/次,7-15次重复或20-60秒/次,每组之间休息20-40秒。进一步的指导提供了针对性的能力,积极作用的临床指标,进展的标准,以及有效的SMT所需的调整。结论:本研究填补了关于SMT剂量的知识空白。结果说明书旨在简化颈部疼痛的SMT实施,并促进其在日常物理治疗实践中的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信