Machine learning models in the prediction of chronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus following subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 0.8 Q4 NEUROIMAGING
Bardia Hajikarimloo, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Salem M Tos, Ali Asgarzadeh, Mahboobeh Tajvidi, Saba Aghajani, Rana Hashemi, Alireza Kooshki
{"title":"Machine learning models in the prediction of chronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus following subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bardia Hajikarimloo, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Salem M Tos, Ali Asgarzadeh, Mahboobeh Tajvidi, Saba Aghajani, Rana Hashemi, Alireza Kooshki","doi":"10.1177/19714009251345104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeChronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus is a frequent consequence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with an unclear pathophysiology, making treatment challenging. Despite favorable outcomes following cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion, high-risk surgical interventions remain necessary in some cases. Accurate prediction of chronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus in SAH patients can play an important role in their management. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the predictive performance of machine learning (ML) models in forecasting chronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus following SAH.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted. ML or deep learning (DL)-based models that predicted chronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus following SAH were included. To avoid bias, only the data of the best-performance model, which was defined by the highest area under the curve (AUC) of the models, were extracted. The pooled AUC, accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated using the R program.ResultsSix studies with 2096 individuals were included. The AUC, ACC, sensitivity, and specificity ranged from 0.8 to 0.92, 0.72 to 0.9, 0.73 to 0.85, and 0.7 to 0.92. The meta-analysis showed a pooled AUC of 0.83 (95%CI: 0.81-0.84) and ACC of 0.79 (95%CI: 0.66-0.91). The meta-analysis revealed a pooled sensitivity of 0.8 (95%CI: 0.73-0.85), specificity of 0.79 (95%CI: 0.68-0.86), and DOR of 12.13 (95%CI: 8.2-17.96) for predictive performance of these models.ConclusionML-based models showed encouraging predictive performance in forecasting chronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus following SAH.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009251345104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251345104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeChronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus is a frequent consequence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with an unclear pathophysiology, making treatment challenging. Despite favorable outcomes following cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion, high-risk surgical interventions remain necessary in some cases. Accurate prediction of chronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus in SAH patients can play an important role in their management. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the predictive performance of machine learning (ML) models in forecasting chronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus following SAH.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted. ML or deep learning (DL)-based models that predicted chronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus following SAH were included. To avoid bias, only the data of the best-performance model, which was defined by the highest area under the curve (AUC) of the models, were extracted. The pooled AUC, accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated using the R program.ResultsSix studies with 2096 individuals were included. The AUC, ACC, sensitivity, and specificity ranged from 0.8 to 0.92, 0.72 to 0.9, 0.73 to 0.85, and 0.7 to 0.92. The meta-analysis showed a pooled AUC of 0.83 (95%CI: 0.81-0.84) and ACC of 0.79 (95%CI: 0.66-0.91). The meta-analysis revealed a pooled sensitivity of 0.8 (95%CI: 0.73-0.85), specificity of 0.79 (95%CI: 0.68-0.86), and DOR of 12.13 (95%CI: 8.2-17.96) for predictive performance of these models.ConclusionML-based models showed encouraging predictive performance in forecasting chronic or shunt-dependent hydrocephalus following SAH.

预测蛛网膜下腔出血后慢性或分流依赖性脑积水的机器学习模型:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
慢性或分流依赖性脑积水是蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的常见后果,病理生理不清楚,使治疗具有挑战性。尽管脑脊液(CSF)转移后的预后良好,但在某些情况下仍然需要高风险的手术干预。准确预测SAH患者的慢性或分流依赖性脑积水在其治疗中发挥重要作用。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了机器学习(ML)模型在预测SAH后慢性或分流依赖性脑积水方面的预测性能。方法系统检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science。包括预测SAH后慢性或分流依赖性脑积水的ML或深度学习(DL)模型。为了避免偏倚,我们只提取以模型的最高曲线下面积(AUC)定义的最佳表现模型的数据。使用R程序计算合并AUC、准确性(ACC)、敏感性、特异性和诊断优势比(DOR)。结果纳入6项研究,共2096人。AUC、ACC、敏感性和特异性范围为0.8 ~ 0.92、0.72 ~ 0.9、0.73 ~ 0.85和0.7 ~ 0.92。meta分析显示合并AUC为0.83 (95%CI: 0.81-0.84), ACC为0.79 (95%CI: 0.66-0.91)。荟萃分析显示,这些模型的预测性能的总敏感性为0.8 (95%CI: 0.73-0.85),特异性为0.79 (95%CI: 0.68-0.86), DOR为12.13 (95%CI: 8.2-17.96)。结论基于ml的模型在预测SAH后慢性或分流依赖性脑积水方面具有令人鼓舞的预测效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信