Bacterial Contamination of Angiographic Materials in Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroangiography.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christiane Franz, Claudia Fleu, Sophia Honecker, Manuela Schmiech, Dimah Hasan, Hani Ridwan, Omid Nikoubashman, Sebastian Lemmen, Martin Wiesmann
{"title":"Bacterial Contamination of Angiographic Materials in Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroangiography.","authors":"Christiane Franz, Claudia Fleu, Sophia Honecker, Manuela Schmiech, Dimah Hasan, Hani Ridwan, Omid Nikoubashman, Sebastian Lemmen, Martin Wiesmann","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01526-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bacterial contamination has been reported to occur during angiographies, although data on its frequency and relevance are limited. The purpose of our study was to determine whether angiographic materials such as catheters and guide wires remain sterile during angiographies. We sought to differentiate between different materials, and to detect the frequency, the extent and the spectrum of bacterial contamination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively collected 698 fluid or material samples from 100 neuroangiographies. Per angiography we analyzed proximal ends and distal tips of catheters and guide wires, and fluid samples from the water container (working bowl) in which materials were stored during the angiography. We analyzed the frequency and extent of contamination and determined the bacterial spectrum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of samples (51.4%) were contaminated. There was no angiography that showed no contamination (0%). The highest proportion of contaminated samples was found in the fluid from the working bowl after completion of the examination (92.9%). Catheters and wires were contaminated in 34.1-49.2% of samples. Contamination of the samples increased with longer duration of the angiographic procedures. Most of the bacterial species were environmental or skin contaminants (86.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bacterial contamination during diagnostic neuroangiographies or interventions is a frequent finding although its clinical significance is believed to be small. Bacterial contamination increases with longer duration of angiographic procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01526-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Bacterial contamination has been reported to occur during angiographies, although data on its frequency and relevance are limited. The purpose of our study was to determine whether angiographic materials such as catheters and guide wires remain sterile during angiographies. We sought to differentiate between different materials, and to detect the frequency, the extent and the spectrum of bacterial contamination.

Methods: We prospectively collected 698 fluid or material samples from 100 neuroangiographies. Per angiography we analyzed proximal ends and distal tips of catheters and guide wires, and fluid samples from the water container (working bowl) in which materials were stored during the angiography. We analyzed the frequency and extent of contamination and determined the bacterial spectrum.

Results: The majority of samples (51.4%) were contaminated. There was no angiography that showed no contamination (0%). The highest proportion of contaminated samples was found in the fluid from the working bowl after completion of the examination (92.9%). Catheters and wires were contaminated in 34.1-49.2% of samples. Contamination of the samples increased with longer duration of the angiographic procedures. Most of the bacterial species were environmental or skin contaminants (86.2%).

Conclusion: Bacterial contamination during diagnostic neuroangiographies or interventions is a frequent finding although its clinical significance is believed to be small. Bacterial contamination increases with longer duration of angiographic procedures.

诊断和介入神经血管造影中血管造影材料的细菌污染。
目的:尽管有关其频率和相关性的数据有限,但已报道在血管造影期间发生细菌污染。我们研究的目的是确定血管造影材料如导管和导丝在血管造影期间是否保持无菌。我们试图区分不同的材料,并检测细菌污染的频率、程度和范围。方法:前瞻性收集100张神经血管造影的698份液体或物质样本。通过血管造影,我们分析了导管和导丝的近端和远端尖端,以及在血管造影期间储存材料的水容器(工作碗)中的液体样本。我们分析了污染的频率和程度,并确定了细菌谱。结果:绝大多数样品(51.4%)被污染。没有血管造影显示没有污染(0%)。在检查结束后的工作碗液中发现的污染样品比例最高(92.9%)。34.1 ~ 49.2%的样品中导管和导线受到污染。样本的污染随着血管造影时间的延长而增加。细菌种类以环境或皮肤污染物居多(86.2%)。结论:在诊断性神经血管造影或干预中,细菌污染是一个常见的发现,尽管其临床意义很小。细菌污染随着血管造影时间的延长而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信