Adherence rates to the minimum information for studies evaluating biologics in orthopedics guidelines for clinical studies on platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Davis Hedbany, Bradley A Lezak, James Butler, Nathaniel P Mercer, Sebastian Krebsbach, John G Kennedy
{"title":"Adherence rates to the minimum information for studies evaluating biologics in orthopedics guidelines for clinical studies on platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review.","authors":"Davis Hedbany, Bradley A Lezak, James Butler, Nathaniel P Mercer, Sebastian Krebsbach, John G Kennedy","doi":"10.5397/cise.2024.01060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral epicondylitis (LE), commonly known as tennis elbow, is a condition involving inflammation of the extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon at its attachment to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. In recent years, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, an ortho-biologic treatment, has emerged as a promising option for the treatment of LE. Despite promising results in clinical trials, variability in PRP preparation and administration is a barrier to consistent outcomes. To address this, the Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopedics (MIBO) guidelines were created in 2017 to establish a standardized approach for reporting findings in PRP-based studies. The objective of this study was to analyze and compare the rate of adherence of the MIBO guidelines in the use of PRP in treating LE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review evaluates the adherence of studies on PRP for LE to MIBO guidelines using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Adherence was determined by calculating the total percentage of checklist items that each study adequately and clearly reported from the 46-point checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 studies (954 patients) were included. Overall, only 52.2% of the 46-point MIBO checklist was reported per article on average with 0 articles displaying adherence rates of 100%. There was no significant difference in the mean adherence rates between studies prior to publication of the MIBO guidelines (45.2%) and after (53.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review demonstrated that studies evaluating the outcomes and procedures of the use of PRP in the setting of LE have poor adherence to MIBO guidelines. There was no difference in the adherence rates in studies published before and after the creation of MIBO guidelines in 2017. Level of evidence: II.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2024.01060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE), commonly known as tennis elbow, is a condition involving inflammation of the extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon at its attachment to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. In recent years, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, an ortho-biologic treatment, has emerged as a promising option for the treatment of LE. Despite promising results in clinical trials, variability in PRP preparation and administration is a barrier to consistent outcomes. To address this, the Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopedics (MIBO) guidelines were created in 2017 to establish a standardized approach for reporting findings in PRP-based studies. The objective of this study was to analyze and compare the rate of adherence of the MIBO guidelines in the use of PRP in treating LE.

Methods: This systematic review evaluates the adherence of studies on PRP for LE to MIBO guidelines using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Adherence was determined by calculating the total percentage of checklist items that each study adequately and clearly reported from the 46-point checklist.

Results: A total of 26 studies (954 patients) were included. Overall, only 52.2% of the 46-point MIBO checklist was reported per article on average with 0 articles displaying adherence rates of 100%. There was no significant difference in the mean adherence rates between studies prior to publication of the MIBO guidelines (45.2%) and after (53.7%).

Conclusions: This review demonstrated that studies evaluating the outcomes and procedures of the use of PRP in the setting of LE have poor adherence to MIBO guidelines. There was no difference in the adherence rates in studies published before and after the creation of MIBO guidelines in 2017. Level of evidence: II.

对骨科中评估生物制剂的最低信息的依从率富血小板血浆治疗外上髁炎临床研究指南:一项系统综述。
背景:外侧上髁炎(LE),通常被称为网球肘,是一种涉及肱骨外侧上髁附着的桡侧腕短伸肌腱炎症的疾病。近年来,富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗作为一种矫形生物治疗,已成为治疗LE的一种有希望的选择。尽管在临床试验中取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但PRP制备和给药的可变性是取得一致结果的障碍。为了解决这个问题,2017年制定了评估骨科生物制剂研究的最低信息(MIBO)指南,以建立基于prp的研究结果报告的标准化方法。本研究的目的是分析和比较使用PRP治疗LE时MIBO指南的依从率。方法:本系统评价使用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目评估LE PRP研究对MIBO指南的依从性。依从性是通过计算每个研究充分和清楚地从46点清单中报告的清单项目的总百分比来确定的。结果:共纳入26项研究(954例患者)。总体而言,平均每篇文章仅报告了46点MIBO检查表中的52.2%,其中0篇文章显示100%的依从率。在MIBO指南发布前(45.2%)和发布后(53.7%)的研究中,平均依从率没有显著差异。结论:本综述表明,评估在LE情况下使用PRP的结果和程序的研究对MIBO指南的依从性较差。在2017年MIBO指南创建前后发表的研究中,依从率没有差异。证据水平:II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信