Ketoprofen Lysine Salt Versus Corticosteroids in Early Outpatient Management of Mild and Moderate COVID-19: A Retrospective Study.

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13030065
Domenica Francesca Mariniello, Raffaella Pagliaro, Vito D'Agnano, Angela Schiattarella, Fabio Perrotta, Andrea Bianco
{"title":"Ketoprofen Lysine Salt Versus Corticosteroids in Early Outpatient Management of Mild and Moderate COVID-19: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Domenica Francesca Mariniello, Raffaella Pagliaro, Vito D'Agnano, Angela Schiattarella, Fabio Perrotta, Andrea Bianco","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13030065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Accelerating recovery and preventing the progression to more severe outcomes for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is of paramount importance. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) have been widely adopted in the international recommendations for non-severe COVID-19 management. Among NSAIDs, evidence about the efficacy of ketoprofen lysin salt (KLS) in the treatment of non-severe COVID-19 has not been reported. <i>Methods:</i> This retrospective study compared the outcomes of 120 patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 treated at home with KLS between March 2021 and May 2023 compared with the outcomes of 165 patients who received corticosteroids. The outcomes included hospitalization, the need for oxygen supplementation, clinical recovery from acute COVID-19, and time to negative swabs. <i>Results:</i> Symptoms persisted in a lower percentage of patients in the KLS group compared to the corticosteroids group (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and for a shorter period (<i>p</i> = 0.046). We found 6 patients (5%) in the KLS group were hospitalized compared to 45 (27%) in the corticosteroids group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A higher percentage of patients in the corticosteroids group require oxygen administration (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In addition, patients taking corticosteroids showed a longer viral shedding period compared to those taking KLS (<i>p</i> = 0.004). A final multivariate analysis suggests that KLS might reduce hospitalization risk, the need for oxygen supplementation, and the persistence of post-COVID-19 symptoms when compared to an oral corticosteroid after adjusting for significant co-variables. <i>Conclusions:</i> KLS might have a positive effect on clinical recovery in non-severe COVID-19 patients. A comparison with other NSAIDs in terms of difference in efficacy and safety should be investigated in further trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13030065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accelerating recovery and preventing the progression to more severe outcomes for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is of paramount importance. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) have been widely adopted in the international recommendations for non-severe COVID-19 management. Among NSAIDs, evidence about the efficacy of ketoprofen lysin salt (KLS) in the treatment of non-severe COVID-19 has not been reported. Methods: This retrospective study compared the outcomes of 120 patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 treated at home with KLS between March 2021 and May 2023 compared with the outcomes of 165 patients who received corticosteroids. The outcomes included hospitalization, the need for oxygen supplementation, clinical recovery from acute COVID-19, and time to negative swabs. Results: Symptoms persisted in a lower percentage of patients in the KLS group compared to the corticosteroids group (p < 0.0001) and for a shorter period (p = 0.046). We found 6 patients (5%) in the KLS group were hospitalized compared to 45 (27%) in the corticosteroids group (p < 0.001). A higher percentage of patients in the corticosteroids group require oxygen administration (p < 0.001). In addition, patients taking corticosteroids showed a longer viral shedding period compared to those taking KLS (p = 0.004). A final multivariate analysis suggests that KLS might reduce hospitalization risk, the need for oxygen supplementation, and the persistence of post-COVID-19 symptoms when compared to an oral corticosteroid after adjusting for significant co-variables. Conclusions: KLS might have a positive effect on clinical recovery in non-severe COVID-19 patients. A comparison with other NSAIDs in terms of difference in efficacy and safety should be investigated in further trials.

酮洛芬赖氨酸盐与皮质类固醇在轻中度COVID-19早期门诊治疗中的回顾性研究
背景:加快2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的康复并防止其发展为更严重的结局至关重要。非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)已被广泛采用于非严重COVID-19管理的国际建议中。在非甾体抗炎药中,有关酮洛芬溶素盐(KLS)治疗非严重COVID-19疗效的证据尚未报道。方法:本回顾性研究比较了2021年3月至2023年5月期间在家中使用KLS治疗的120例轻中度COVID-19患者的结局,与165例接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者的结局。结果包括住院、补氧需求、急性COVID-19临床恢复以及拭子阴性时间。结果:与皮质类固醇组相比,KLS组患者症状持续的百分比较低(p < 0.0001),持续时间较短(p = 0.046)。我们发现KLS组有6例(5%)患者住院,而皮质类固醇组有45例(27%)患者住院(p < 0.001)。糖皮质激素组需要给氧的患者比例较高(p < 0.001)。此外,服用皮质类固醇的患者比服用KLS的患者有更长的病毒脱落期(p = 0.004)。最终的多变量分析表明,在调整了重要的协变量后,与口服皮质类固醇相比,KLS可能会降低住院风险、补氧需求和covid -19后症状的持久性。结论:KLS可能对非重症COVID-19患者的临床康复有积极作用。与其他非甾体抗炎药在疗效和安全性方面的差异有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信