Affinity Group Experiences in Pharmacy Education: A Pilot Study.

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13030070
Elise Moore, Caroline Gaither, Olihe Okoro, Laura Palombi, L'Aurelle A Johnson
{"title":"Affinity Group Experiences in Pharmacy Education: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Elise Moore, Caroline Gaither, Olihe Okoro, Laura Palombi, L'Aurelle A Johnson","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13030070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to examine the current wellbeing among pharmacy students in underrepresented groups (URGs) and investigate the impact on having access to affinity groups. A survey was distributed to students in April and May 2023, at a Midwestern College of Pharmacy, centering around diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) efforts and their impact on student wellbeing and experiences with the college-supported affinity groups. Student responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Sixty-five (75%) of the eighty-six students who completed the survey identified with at least one URG. First-generation students (<i>n</i> = 36), underrepresented racial/ethnic groups (<i>n</i> = 24), and LGBTQ+ (<i>n</i> = 13) were the three most prominent groups. Twenty-seven percent (<i>n</i> = 23) of students belonged to multiple URGs. Among the students in URGs, three out of four experienced distress. The students in URGs experienced distress at a higher rate compared to their peers in all categories. Twenty percent (<i>n</i> = 16) of students did not agree that there was equitable treatment on campus. This rate was higher among students in URGs compared to their peers. Eighty-three percent (<i>n</i> = 52) of individuals who did not participate in an affinity group recognized there was a need. Among individuals who did not participate, nearly half identified with a URG. Pharmacy students, especially those in URGs, may benefit from additional interventions by pharmacy schools to improve the offering and visibility of supportive services. Providing URG-centered resources addresses the gap between the wellbeing and academic experience of pharmacy students in URGs compared to their peers.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13030070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine the current wellbeing among pharmacy students in underrepresented groups (URGs) and investigate the impact on having access to affinity groups. A survey was distributed to students in April and May 2023, at a Midwestern College of Pharmacy, centering around diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) efforts and their impact on student wellbeing and experiences with the college-supported affinity groups. Student responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Sixty-five (75%) of the eighty-six students who completed the survey identified with at least one URG. First-generation students (n = 36), underrepresented racial/ethnic groups (n = 24), and LGBTQ+ (n = 13) were the three most prominent groups. Twenty-seven percent (n = 23) of students belonged to multiple URGs. Among the students in URGs, three out of four experienced distress. The students in URGs experienced distress at a higher rate compared to their peers in all categories. Twenty percent (n = 16) of students did not agree that there was equitable treatment on campus. This rate was higher among students in URGs compared to their peers. Eighty-three percent (n = 52) of individuals who did not participate in an affinity group recognized there was a need. Among individuals who did not participate, nearly half identified with a URG. Pharmacy students, especially those in URGs, may benefit from additional interventions by pharmacy schools to improve the offering and visibility of supportive services. Providing URG-centered resources addresses the gap between the wellbeing and academic experience of pharmacy students in URGs compared to their peers.

亲和团体经验在药学教育中的初步研究。
本研究的目的是检查在代表性不足的群体(URGs)的药学学生目前的福利,并调查对有机会获得亲和团体的影响。一项调查于2023年4月和5月在中西部药学院向学生分发,主要围绕多样性,公平性,包容性和可访问性(DEIA)的努力及其对学生福祉的影响以及与大学支持的亲和团体的体验。使用描述性统计分析学生的反应。在完成调查的86名学生中,有65名(75%)至少有一种URG。第一代学生(n = 36)、未被充分代表的种族/族裔群体(n = 24)和LGBTQ+ (n = 13)是三个最突出的群体。27% (n = 23)的学生属于多个urg。在urg的学生中,四分之三的人经历过痛苦。urg组的学生比其他组的学生更容易感到痛苦。20% (n = 16)的学生不认为校园里存在公平待遇。在urg的学生中,这一比例高于他们的同龄人。83% (n = 52)没有参加亲和团体的人认识到有这种需要。在没有参与的人中,近一半的人有URG。药学专业的学生,特别是URGs的学生,可以从药学学校的额外干预中受益,以改善支持性服务的提供和可见性。提供以urg为中心的资源解决了urg中药学学生与同龄人相比的健康和学术经历之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信