Shufang Yao, Shaozhuang Ma, Lishuo Shi, Fang Wu, Elizabeth Reis
{"title":"Balancing Stakeholder Interests: A Balanced Scorecard Perspective on Performance Appraisal Implementation in China's Public Hospitals.","authors":"Shufang Yao, Shaozhuang Ma, Lishuo Shi, Fang Wu, Elizabeth Reis","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2019, the Chinese government initiated a National Performance Appraisal for Tertiary Public Hospitals (the 'National Appraisal'), but limited study has been conducted on its appraisal indicators and its implementation effects. This study aims to assess how well this system balances the interests of key stakeholders in Chinese public hospitals and examines the positive changes and concurrent challenges it has brought to hospital operations. Utilising stakeholder theory and the balanced scorecard, we conducted two rounds of Delphi consultations with experts (N<sub>1</sub> = 46, N<sub>2</sub> = 29). We also analysed archival data from three hospitals' 'National Appraisal' records covering 2018 to 2020. Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews (N = 41) with key stakeholders from these hospitals. Kendall's coefficient of concordance was employed in both rounds to gauge the agreement among experts and thematic analysis was applied to analyse data from in-depth interviews with the key stakeholders of the three sampled hospitals. The results show that: (1) The key stakeholders of Chinese public hospitals include patients, hospital executives, health care workers, health authorities, and the public, but the 'National Appraisal' indicators only cover the first three stakeholders; (2) The 'National Appraisal' system adopted a balanced scorecard approach, patient-centre and with emphases on internal process; (3) The 'National Appraisal' had positive impacts on hospitals, clarifying hospital strategy and prioritising the public roles, enhancing health care quality, safety, and efficiency, as well as patient and health care worker satisfaction. However, implementation challenges arise from resource constraints, discrepancy between appraisal indicators and patient needs, misalignment between appraisal indicators and doctor's patient care practices, and the tension between nationwide standardized appraisal and local context. This study significantly contributes to the literature by empirically examining performance appraisal implementation in an under-researched country's public hospitals, offering practical implications and policy recommendations for practitioners, managers, and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3948","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 2019, the Chinese government initiated a National Performance Appraisal for Tertiary Public Hospitals (the 'National Appraisal'), but limited study has been conducted on its appraisal indicators and its implementation effects. This study aims to assess how well this system balances the interests of key stakeholders in Chinese public hospitals and examines the positive changes and concurrent challenges it has brought to hospital operations. Utilising stakeholder theory and the balanced scorecard, we conducted two rounds of Delphi consultations with experts (N1 = 46, N2 = 29). We also analysed archival data from three hospitals' 'National Appraisal' records covering 2018 to 2020. Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews (N = 41) with key stakeholders from these hospitals. Kendall's coefficient of concordance was employed in both rounds to gauge the agreement among experts and thematic analysis was applied to analyse data from in-depth interviews with the key stakeholders of the three sampled hospitals. The results show that: (1) The key stakeholders of Chinese public hospitals include patients, hospital executives, health care workers, health authorities, and the public, but the 'National Appraisal' indicators only cover the first three stakeholders; (2) The 'National Appraisal' system adopted a balanced scorecard approach, patient-centre and with emphases on internal process; (3) The 'National Appraisal' had positive impacts on hospitals, clarifying hospital strategy and prioritising the public roles, enhancing health care quality, safety, and efficiency, as well as patient and health care worker satisfaction. However, implementation challenges arise from resource constraints, discrepancy between appraisal indicators and patient needs, misalignment between appraisal indicators and doctor's patient care practices, and the tension between nationwide standardized appraisal and local context. This study significantly contributes to the literature by empirically examining performance appraisal implementation in an under-researched country's public hospitals, offering practical implications and policy recommendations for practitioners, managers, and policymakers.
期刊介绍:
Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.