Development of entrustable professional activities framework for clinical microbiology residency: a national multi-step consensus using modified Delphi study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mennatallah H Rizk, Niveen Ghoraba, Hanaa S Elhoshy, Omayma Hamed
{"title":"Development of entrustable professional activities framework for clinical microbiology residency: a national multi-step consensus using modified Delphi study.","authors":"Mennatallah H Rizk, Niveen Ghoraba, Hanaa S Elhoshy, Omayma Hamed","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07345-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While competency-based education has gained prominence in preparing professionals for practice, clinical microbiology residency programs face a challenge in defining specific, observable tasks that align with Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs). The current lack of a standardized set of EPAs tailored to clinical microbiology creates a gap in assessing learner proficiency and educational outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to develop and validate a set of specific EPAs for clinical microbiology using a multi-step national expert consensus-building process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in Egypt, involving experts from various medical schools across the country. As the first step, a thorough literature review was undertaken to identify potential EPAs pertinent to clinical microbiology residency programs. Then, evaluation of EPAs for quality and structure using EQual rubric involved five experts in medical education and clinical microbiology, resulting in the confirmation of relevant EPAs. Subsequently, three rounds of the modified Delphi method were employed, engaging ten clinical microbiology experts from various medical schools. Simultaneously, content validity was assessed based on these ratings. Participants also determined the appropriate year of entrustment for each EPA item, and an 80% Validity index agreement threshold was calculated to ensure consensus among participant groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of the literature review and initial expert evaluation using EQual rubric confirmed 39 out of the initially identified 43 EPAs. Following the modified Delphi method rounds, 16 EPAs gained acceptance, signifying their relevance and appropriateness for clinical microbiology residency training. These EPAs were categorized into key areas, including preanalytical testing and quality assurance, microbiological techniques and diagnostics, infection control and safety practices, clinical leadership and teamwork, research and development, and laboratory management and communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study developed 16 EPAs for clinical microbiology residency programs. These EPAs were developed using a robust multi step validation study. This provides a further step towards competency-based postgraduate training in clinical microbiology.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07345-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While competency-based education has gained prominence in preparing professionals for practice, clinical microbiology residency programs face a challenge in defining specific, observable tasks that align with Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs). The current lack of a standardized set of EPAs tailored to clinical microbiology creates a gap in assessing learner proficiency and educational outcomes.

Objectives: This study aims to develop and validate a set of specific EPAs for clinical microbiology using a multi-step national expert consensus-building process.

Methods: This study was conducted in Egypt, involving experts from various medical schools across the country. As the first step, a thorough literature review was undertaken to identify potential EPAs pertinent to clinical microbiology residency programs. Then, evaluation of EPAs for quality and structure using EQual rubric involved five experts in medical education and clinical microbiology, resulting in the confirmation of relevant EPAs. Subsequently, three rounds of the modified Delphi method were employed, engaging ten clinical microbiology experts from various medical schools. Simultaneously, content validity was assessed based on these ratings. Participants also determined the appropriate year of entrustment for each EPA item, and an 80% Validity index agreement threshold was calculated to ensure consensus among participant groups.

Results: The use of the literature review and initial expert evaluation using EQual rubric confirmed 39 out of the initially identified 43 EPAs. Following the modified Delphi method rounds, 16 EPAs gained acceptance, signifying their relevance and appropriateness for clinical microbiology residency training. These EPAs were categorized into key areas, including preanalytical testing and quality assurance, microbiological techniques and diagnostics, infection control and safety practices, clinical leadership and teamwork, research and development, and laboratory management and communication.

Conclusions: This study developed 16 EPAs for clinical microbiology residency programs. These EPAs were developed using a robust multi step validation study. This provides a further step towards competency-based postgraduate training in clinical microbiology.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

临床微生物学住院医师可信赖的专业活动框架的发展:采用修正德尔菲研究的全国多步骤共识。
背景:虽然以能力为基础的教育在为专业人员的实践做准备方面取得了突出的成就,但临床微生物学住院医师项目在定义与可信赖的专业活动(EPAs)相一致的具体、可观察的任务方面面临着挑战。目前缺乏一套针对临床微生物学的标准化EPAs,这在评估学习者熟练程度和教育成果方面造成了差距。目的:本研究旨在通过多步骤的国家专家共识建立过程,开发和验证一套针对临床微生物学的特定epa。方法:本研究在埃及进行,涉及全国各医学院的专家。作为第一步,我们进行了全面的文献综述,以确定与临床微生物学住院医师计划相关的潜在EPAs。然后,5位医学教育和临床微生物学专家采用EQual准则对epa的质量和结构进行评价,最终确定相关epa。随后,采用三轮改进的德尔菲法,聘请了10名来自各医学院的临床微生物学专家。同时,根据这些评分评估内容效度。参与者还确定了每个EPA项目的适当委托年份,并计算了80%有效性指数协议阈值,以确保参与者群体之间的共识。结果:使用文献回顾和使用EQual标题的初步专家评估确认了最初确定的43个EPAs中的39个。经过改进的德尔菲法轮次,16份EPAs获得接受,表明其与临床微生物学住院医师培训的相关性和适宜性。这些环境保护措施被划分为关键领域,包括分析前检测和质量保证、微生物技术和诊断、感染控制和安全实践、临床领导和团队合作、研究和开发以及实验室管理和沟通。结论:本研究为临床微生物学住院医师项目制定了16个EPAs。这些epa是通过稳健的多步骤验证研究开发的。这为临床微生物学的能力为基础的研究生培训提供了进一步的步骤。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信