Impaired Cognition and Illness Beliefs in Breast Cancer Survivors Comorbid With Diabetes.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Devarshi Vasa, Lauren Guerra, Abigail Feinberg, Mita S Goel, Yael Tobi Harris, Jenny J Lin, Jacqueline H Becker
{"title":"Impaired Cognition and Illness Beliefs in Breast Cancer Survivors Comorbid With Diabetes.","authors":"Devarshi Vasa, Lauren Guerra, Abigail Feinberg, Mita S Goel, Yael Tobi Harris, Jenny J Lin, Jacqueline H Becker","doi":"10.1002/pon.70186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer survivors (BCS) are at greater risk for cognitive impairment due to their cancer status, treatment history, and frequent comorbid illnesses such as diabetes (DM). Given the critical role of cognition in illness beliefs, cognitive impairments can contribute to inaccurate risk perceptions, misunderstanding of information, and limited symptom awareness, which have significant implications for disease self-management. In a cohort of BCS with DM, we investigated the relationship between cognitive impairments and illness beliefs about DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured illness beliefs in our cohort of BCS with DM using the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ). Cognition was assessed utilizing a well-validated neuropsychological battery (i.e., WAIS-IV, Trail Making Test-A&B, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test) measuring attention, working memory, executive functioning, processing speed, and learning and memory. Cognitive impairment was classified as z-scores ≤ -1.5 standard deviations below the normative mean adjusting for age, sex, and education. Wilcoxon tests assessed the associations between cognitive impairments and illness beliefs, subsequently adjusted for age, race, and breast cancer stage using multivariable regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 244 BCS with DM [mean (SD) age: 66.5 (7) years], 26.3% had impairments in attention, 19.1% in working memory, 24.1% in executive functioning, 9.9% in processing speed, 26.9% in memory recall, and 17.5% in memory retention. Impairments in attention, working memory, or executive functioning were associated with greater belief that DM is episodic (p = 0.003, 0.01, 0.003), short-term (p = 0.04, 0.04, 0.009), and less controllable (p = 0.006, < 0.001, 0.03). Impairments in attention and working memory were also linked to stronger beliefs that DM was due to chance (p = 0.003, 0.02). Those with processing speed impairments more often believed DM was episodic (p = 0.003) and less controllable (p = 0.004). Memory retention impairments were similarly associated with lower perceived control (p = 0.03), and memory recall impairments with the belief that DM is short-term (p = 0.01). All associations remained significant after adjustment for age, race, and breast cancer stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BCS with DM and impairments in cognition, particularly in attention, working memory, and executive functioning, are more likely to hold suboptimal beliefs about their DM. These findings highlight the importance of screening for cognitive impairments in these patients in order to identify those at risk for poor disease self-management and outcomes. Future studies should explore interventions or compensatory strategies to best support BCS with DM and cognitive impairments.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 5","pages":"e70186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70186","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer survivors (BCS) are at greater risk for cognitive impairment due to their cancer status, treatment history, and frequent comorbid illnesses such as diabetes (DM). Given the critical role of cognition in illness beliefs, cognitive impairments can contribute to inaccurate risk perceptions, misunderstanding of information, and limited symptom awareness, which have significant implications for disease self-management. In a cohort of BCS with DM, we investigated the relationship between cognitive impairments and illness beliefs about DM.

Methods: We measured illness beliefs in our cohort of BCS with DM using the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ). Cognition was assessed utilizing a well-validated neuropsychological battery (i.e., WAIS-IV, Trail Making Test-A&B, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test) measuring attention, working memory, executive functioning, processing speed, and learning and memory. Cognitive impairment was classified as z-scores ≤ -1.5 standard deviations below the normative mean adjusting for age, sex, and education. Wilcoxon tests assessed the associations between cognitive impairments and illness beliefs, subsequently adjusted for age, race, and breast cancer stage using multivariable regression models.

Results: Of the 244 BCS with DM [mean (SD) age: 66.5 (7) years], 26.3% had impairments in attention, 19.1% in working memory, 24.1% in executive functioning, 9.9% in processing speed, 26.9% in memory recall, and 17.5% in memory retention. Impairments in attention, working memory, or executive functioning were associated with greater belief that DM is episodic (p = 0.003, 0.01, 0.003), short-term (p = 0.04, 0.04, 0.009), and less controllable (p = 0.006, < 0.001, 0.03). Impairments in attention and working memory were also linked to stronger beliefs that DM was due to chance (p = 0.003, 0.02). Those with processing speed impairments more often believed DM was episodic (p = 0.003) and less controllable (p = 0.004). Memory retention impairments were similarly associated with lower perceived control (p = 0.03), and memory recall impairments with the belief that DM is short-term (p = 0.01). All associations remained significant after adjustment for age, race, and breast cancer stage.

Conclusions: BCS with DM and impairments in cognition, particularly in attention, working memory, and executive functioning, are more likely to hold suboptimal beliefs about their DM. These findings highlight the importance of screening for cognitive impairments in these patients in order to identify those at risk for poor disease self-management and outcomes. Future studies should explore interventions or compensatory strategies to best support BCS with DM and cognitive impairments.

乳腺癌合并糖尿病幸存者的认知障碍和疾病信念
背景:乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)由于其癌症状况、治疗史和常见的合并症(如糖尿病),认知功能障碍的风险更高。鉴于认知在疾病信念中的关键作用,认知障碍可能导致不准确的风险感知、信息误解和症状意识有限,这对疾病自我管理具有重要影响。方法:采用疾病感知问卷(IPQ)对BCS合并DM患者的疾病信念进行测量。认知能力的评估采用了经过验证的神经心理学测试(即WAIS-IV, Trail Making Test- a & b, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test),测量注意力、工作记忆、执行功能、处理速度、学习记忆。经年龄、性别和教育程度调整后的z-score低于规范平均值≤-1.5个标准差,将认知障碍归为z-score。Wilcoxon测试评估了认知障碍和疾病信念之间的关系,随后使用多变量回归模型调整了年龄、种族和乳腺癌分期。结果:244例患有DM的BCS[平均(SD)年龄:66.5(7)岁]中,26.3%的人有注意力障碍,19.1%的人有工作记忆障碍,24.1%的人有执行功能障碍,9.9%的人有处理速度障碍,26.9%的人有记忆回忆障碍,17.5%的人有记忆保持障碍。注意力、工作记忆或执行功能的损伤与更多地相信糖尿病是偶发性的(p = 0.003、0.01、0.003)、短期的(p = 0.04、0.04、0.009)和较难控制的(p = 0.006)相关。患有糖尿病和认知障碍的BCS,特别是在注意力、工作记忆和执行功能方面,更有可能对他们的糖尿病持有次优信念。这些发现强调了筛查这些患者的认知障碍的重要性,以确定那些有疾病自我管理和预后不良风险的患者。未来的研究应该探索干预或补偿策略,以最好地支持BCS合并糖尿病和认知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信