The Influence of Cognitive and Affective Trust on the Utilization of Family Doctor Services: A Chinese Cross-Sectional Survey Based on McAllister's Theory.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-05-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S504605
Wenqi Xiao, Bo Huang, Huiyan Fang, Yilin Li, Weizhuo Chen, Ting Ye
{"title":"The Influence of Cognitive and Affective Trust on the Utilization of Family Doctor Services: A Chinese Cross-Sectional Survey Based on McAllister's Theory.","authors":"Wenqi Xiao, Bo Huang, Huiyan Fang, Yilin Li, Weizhuo Chen, Ting Ye","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S504605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study explores the impact of cognitive and affective trust on the utilization of family doctor services based on McAllister's theory. It also analyzes the factors influencing these forms of trust.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study using stratified random sampling gathered data from 325 adult patients registered with family doctors in six community health centers in Wuhan, China. PLS-SEM was employed to examine the relationships among cognitive trust, affective trust, and the utilization of family doctor services. Logistic regression was utilized to identify the factors influencing cognitive and affective trust.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher cognitive trust significantly influenced affective trust (β = 0.549, p < 0.01) and was positively associated with service utilization (β = 0.524, p < 0.01). Affective trust also showed a positive association with service utilization (β= 0.481, p < 0.01). Occupation and marital status were found to have a significant impact on both cognitive and affective trust. Specifically, professional and technical workers(OR=9.699, p=0.001;OR=2.309, p=0.011) and non-married individuals(OR=7.591, p=0.001;OR=2.737, p=0.002) demonstrated higher trust levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveals the importance of cognitive and affective trust in patient engagement with family doctor services. It suggests that family doctors should enhance their professionalism while also demonstrating emotional care to improve overall healthcare quality. Additionally, attention should be given to the influence of factors such as occupation and marital status on patients' trust in family doctors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"1463-1473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S504605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the impact of cognitive and affective trust on the utilization of family doctor services based on McAllister's theory. It also analyzes the factors influencing these forms of trust.

Patients and methods: A cross-sectional study using stratified random sampling gathered data from 325 adult patients registered with family doctors in six community health centers in Wuhan, China. PLS-SEM was employed to examine the relationships among cognitive trust, affective trust, and the utilization of family doctor services. Logistic regression was utilized to identify the factors influencing cognitive and affective trust.

Results: Higher cognitive trust significantly influenced affective trust (β = 0.549, p < 0.01) and was positively associated with service utilization (β = 0.524, p < 0.01). Affective trust also showed a positive association with service utilization (β= 0.481, p < 0.01). Occupation and marital status were found to have a significant impact on both cognitive and affective trust. Specifically, professional and technical workers(OR=9.699, p=0.001;OR=2.309, p=0.011) and non-married individuals(OR=7.591, p=0.001;OR=2.737, p=0.002) demonstrated higher trust levels.

Conclusion: The study reveals the importance of cognitive and affective trust in patient engagement with family doctor services. It suggests that family doctors should enhance their professionalism while also demonstrating emotional care to improve overall healthcare quality. Additionally, attention should be given to the influence of factors such as occupation and marital status on patients' trust in family doctors.

认知信任和情感信任对家庭医生服务利用的影响:基于麦卡利斯特理论的中国横断面调查
目的:本研究基于McAllister理论,探讨认知信任和情感信任对家庭医生服务利用的影响。本文还分析了影响这些信任形式的因素。患者和方法:采用分层随机抽样的横断面研究收集了中国武汉6个社区卫生中心在家庭医生处登记的325名成年患者的数据。采用PLS-SEM分析认知信任、情感信任与家庭医生服务利用的关系。运用Logistic回归分析认知信任和情感信任的影响因素。结果:高认知信任显著影响情感信任(β = 0.549, p < 0.01),与服务利用呈正相关(β = 0.524, p < 0.01)。情感信任与服务利用呈显著正相关(β= 0.481, p < 0.01)。职业和婚姻状况对认知信任和情感信任均有显著影响。其中,专业技术人员(OR=9.699, p=0.001;OR=2.309, p=0.011)和未婚人员(OR=7.591, p=0.001;OR=2.737, p=0.002)的信任水平较高。结论:本研究揭示了认知信任和情感信任对患者参与家庭医生服务的重要性。建议家庭医生在提高专业水平的同时,也要体现情感关怀,以提高整体医疗质量。此外,还应注意职业、婚姻状况等因素对患者对家庭医生信任程度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信