Factors Influencing the Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibody Biologics in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
{"title":"Factors Influencing the Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibody Biologics in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Yuxin Wang, Jinmei Luo, Rong Huang, Yi Xiao","doi":"10.1007/s00408-025-00795-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monoclonal antibody therapies targeting specific inflammatory pathways have shown potential in treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the efficacy and safety of these treatments across different patient phenotypes remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis included 15 registered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating monoclonal antibodies targeting type 2 and non-type 2 inflammatory pathways in COPD. The primary outcomes assessed were rates of moderate to severe exacerbations, rates of severe exacerbations, lung function (pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, and safety-related events. Subgroup analyses were performed based on inflammatory phenotype, exacerbation frequency, and smoking status. Meta-regression was used to examine the influence of covariates, such as baseline FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred and other demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Monoclonal antibody therapies significantly reduced the rates of moderate to severe exacerbations (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.93) and severe exacerbations (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.94). Subgroup analyses revealed more pronounced benefits in eosinophilic and frequent exacerbator phenotypes. Non-eosinophilic patients demonstrated a better response to IL-33-targeting therapies. Lung function and quality of life showed modest improvements across most therapies. Smoking status and baseline FEV<sub>1</sub> were significant modifiers of treatment efficacy. No significant increase in serious adverse events was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Monoclonal antibody therapies, particularly those targeting type 2 inflammation, effectively reduce exacerbation rates in COPD, with greater benefits observed in patients with eosinophilic phenotypes and frequent exacerbations. Baseline lung function also influences treatment response. These findings underscore the importance of personalized, phenotype-driven treatment approaches and support the continued development of biologics for COPD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":18163,"journal":{"name":"Lung","volume":"203 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-025-00795-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Monoclonal antibody therapies targeting specific inflammatory pathways have shown potential in treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the efficacy and safety of these treatments across different patient phenotypes remain uncertain.
Methods: This meta-analysis included 15 registered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating monoclonal antibodies targeting type 2 and non-type 2 inflammatory pathways in COPD. The primary outcomes assessed were rates of moderate to severe exacerbations, rates of severe exacerbations, lung function (pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, and safety-related events. Subgroup analyses were performed based on inflammatory phenotype, exacerbation frequency, and smoking status. Meta-regression was used to examine the influence of covariates, such as baseline FEV1%pred and other demographic factors.
Results: Monoclonal antibody therapies significantly reduced the rates of moderate to severe exacerbations (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.93) and severe exacerbations (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.94). Subgroup analyses revealed more pronounced benefits in eosinophilic and frequent exacerbator phenotypes. Non-eosinophilic patients demonstrated a better response to IL-33-targeting therapies. Lung function and quality of life showed modest improvements across most therapies. Smoking status and baseline FEV1 were significant modifiers of treatment efficacy. No significant increase in serious adverse events was noted.
Conclusions: Monoclonal antibody therapies, particularly those targeting type 2 inflammation, effectively reduce exacerbation rates in COPD, with greater benefits observed in patients with eosinophilic phenotypes and frequent exacerbations. Baseline lung function also influences treatment response. These findings underscore the importance of personalized, phenotype-driven treatment approaches and support the continued development of biologics for COPD management.
背景:针对特定炎症途径的单克隆抗体疗法在治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)方面显示出潜力。然而,这些治疗在不同患者表型中的有效性和安全性仍然不确定。方法:本荟萃分析包括15项注册的随机对照试验(rct),评估针对2型和非2型炎症途径的单克隆抗体在COPD中的作用。评估的主要结局是中度至重度加重率、严重加重率、肺功能(支气管扩张剂使用前和使用后的FEV1)、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分和安全相关事件。根据炎症表型、加重频率和吸烟状况进行亚组分析。meta回归用于检验协变量的影响,如基线FEV1%pred和其他人口统计学因素。结果:单克隆抗体治疗显著降低了中度至重度加重(RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.93)和重度加重(RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.94)的发生率。亚组分析显示嗜酸性粒细胞和频繁加重表型更明显的益处。非嗜酸性粒细胞患者对il -33靶向治疗的反应更好。肺功能和生活质量在大多数治疗中显示出适度的改善。吸烟状况和基线FEV1是治疗效果的显著改变因素。严重不良事件未见显著增加。结论:单克隆抗体治疗,特别是针对2型炎症的单克隆抗体治疗,可有效降低COPD的加重率,在嗜酸性粒细胞表型和频繁加重的患者中观察到更大的益处。基线肺功能也影响治疗反应。这些发现强调了个性化、表型驱动治疗方法的重要性,并支持生物制剂在COPD治疗中的持续发展。
期刊介绍:
Lung publishes original articles, reviews and editorials on all aspects of the healthy and diseased lungs, of the airways, and of breathing. Epidemiological, clinical, pathophysiological, biochemical, and pharmacological studies fall within the scope of the journal. Case reports, short communications and technical notes can be accepted if they are of particular interest.