A comprehensive congenital syphilis case report with evidence-based insights into current practices.

Q3 Medicine
Ramona Mohora, Alexandra Diaconu, Silvia-Maria Stoicescu, Octaviana Cristea
{"title":"A comprehensive congenital syphilis case report with evidence-based insights into current practices.","authors":"Ramona Mohora, Alexandra Diaconu, Silvia-Maria Stoicescu, Octaviana Cristea","doi":"10.25122/jml-2024-0363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Congenital syphilis is one of the most well-known congenital infections. Despite notable progress in early diagnosis of syphilis paired with the accessibility of cost-effective treatment and preventive strategies, a few cases continue to be diagnosed in the department of obstetrics. This paper presents a case study of an infant with low birth weight, delivered by an adolescent mother, part of a marginalized demographic group. Due to the mother's lack of routine prenatal care, the infant's management required a series of investigations to establish a comprehensive differential diagnosis. Maternal serological assessments for syphilis, including both non-treponemal antibody test (RPR) and treponemal antibody test (TPHA), yielded positive results following fetal extraction via cesarean section, specifically after diagnosis of syphilis in the infant. Within the first 24 hours of life, newborn serologic tests for syphilis (STS) (including RPR and TPHA assays) exhibited reactivity with titers equivalent to maternal samples. Furthermore, at three weeks of life, the neonatal STS titer exceeded that of the maternal titer, displaying a fourfold increase over the maternal STS level. This finding was concomitant with the detection of IgM antibodies against T. pallidum. Screening for other congenital infections yielded negative results. Subsequent to the high-risk infant follow-up, in accordance with the National Guidelines, the infant had a good outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"18 4","pages":"324-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2024-0363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Congenital syphilis is one of the most well-known congenital infections. Despite notable progress in early diagnosis of syphilis paired with the accessibility of cost-effective treatment and preventive strategies, a few cases continue to be diagnosed in the department of obstetrics. This paper presents a case study of an infant with low birth weight, delivered by an adolescent mother, part of a marginalized demographic group. Due to the mother's lack of routine prenatal care, the infant's management required a series of investigations to establish a comprehensive differential diagnosis. Maternal serological assessments for syphilis, including both non-treponemal antibody test (RPR) and treponemal antibody test (TPHA), yielded positive results following fetal extraction via cesarean section, specifically after diagnosis of syphilis in the infant. Within the first 24 hours of life, newborn serologic tests for syphilis (STS) (including RPR and TPHA assays) exhibited reactivity with titers equivalent to maternal samples. Furthermore, at three weeks of life, the neonatal STS titer exceeded that of the maternal titer, displaying a fourfold increase over the maternal STS level. This finding was concomitant with the detection of IgM antibodies against T. pallidum. Screening for other congenital infections yielded negative results. Subsequent to the high-risk infant follow-up, in accordance with the National Guidelines, the infant had a good outcome.

一个全面的先天性梅毒病例报告,以证据为基础的见解到目前的做法。
先天性梅毒是最著名的先天性感染之一。尽管在梅毒的早期诊断方面取得了显著进展,同时获得了具有成本效益的治疗和预防策略,但仍有少数病例在产科得到诊断。本文提出了一个低出生体重婴儿的案例研究,由一个青少年母亲,边缘化人口群体的一部分交付。由于母亲缺乏常规的产前护理,婴儿的管理需要一系列的调查,以建立一个全面的鉴别诊断。孕妇梅毒血清学评估,包括非梅毒螺旋体抗体测试(RPR)和梅毒螺旋体抗体测试(TPHA),在剖宫产提取胎儿后,特别是在婴儿诊断为梅毒后,结果均为阳性。在出生后的24小时内,新生儿梅毒血清学检测(包括RPR和TPHA检测)显示出与母体样本相同滴度的反应性。此外,在出生三周时,新生儿的STS效价超过了母体的效价,比母体的STS水平高出四倍。这一发现与检测抗苍白球绦虫的IgM抗体同时存在。其他先天性感染的筛查结果为阴性。高危婴儿随访后,按照国家指南,婴儿预后良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信