Ryosuke Fuma, Mai Ohkubo, Keina Miura, Tetsuya Sugiyama, Ryo Ishida
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effect of Training on the Anterior Belly of the Digastric Muscle Using Ultrasound Elastography.","authors":"Ryosuke Fuma, Mai Ohkubo, Keina Miura, Tetsuya Sugiyama, Ryo Ishida","doi":"10.1111/joor.13988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) strengthens muscles and is used to treat dysphagia. Assessing NMES training at rest is preferable because patients may experience difficulty following instructions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether muscle hardness, circumference and area changes can be measured using ultrasound real-time tissue elastography (RTE) after NMES of the anterior belly of the digastric muscle and whether these measurements can be an index for muscle activity during NMES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 21 healthy adults were included in this study. Baseline hardness, circumference and area of the anterior belly of the digastric muscle at rest and with the mouth open, as well as the muscle activity of the submandibular surface layer when the mouth was open, were measured using RTE and surface electromyography. NMES was performed for 30 min weekly for 4 weeks, and similar measurements were taken at 2 and 4 weeks after the start of stimulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Muscle hardness at rest and with the mouth open differed significantly between baseline and Week 4 (resting: p = 0.0048; mouth open: p = 0.034). The strain ratio at Weeks 2 and 4 correlated negatively with the maximum voluntary contraction (Week 2: r = -0.77, p < 0.01; Week 4: r = -0.564, p < 0.05). A positive correlation was found between muscle hardness at rest and with the mouth open at Week 4 (r = 0.544, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that muscle hardness at rest determined using RTE may be utilised to assess the influence of NMES. This measurement could serve as an objective indicator for implementing NMES.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) strengthens muscles and is used to treat dysphagia. Assessing NMES training at rest is preferable because patients may experience difficulty following instructions.
Objectives: To determine whether muscle hardness, circumference and area changes can be measured using ultrasound real-time tissue elastography (RTE) after NMES of the anterior belly of the digastric muscle and whether these measurements can be an index for muscle activity during NMES.
Methods: Overall, 21 healthy adults were included in this study. Baseline hardness, circumference and area of the anterior belly of the digastric muscle at rest and with the mouth open, as well as the muscle activity of the submandibular surface layer when the mouth was open, were measured using RTE and surface electromyography. NMES was performed for 30 min weekly for 4 weeks, and similar measurements were taken at 2 and 4 weeks after the start of stimulation.
Results: Muscle hardness at rest and with the mouth open differed significantly between baseline and Week 4 (resting: p = 0.0048; mouth open: p = 0.034). The strain ratio at Weeks 2 and 4 correlated negatively with the maximum voluntary contraction (Week 2: r = -0.77, p < 0.01; Week 4: r = -0.564, p < 0.05). A positive correlation was found between muscle hardness at rest and with the mouth open at Week 4 (r = 0.544, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Our results indicate that muscle hardness at rest determined using RTE may be utilised to assess the influence of NMES. This measurement could serve as an objective indicator for implementing NMES.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.