Hand hygiene knowledge, beliefs, and practices among healthcare professionals in the primary healthcare centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.

Q3 Medicine
Shuaa Rahail Alanazi, Abeer Jassam Alanazi, Mona Salem Alanazi, Fatima Rashid Alenazi, Nessreen Mohammed Algushiry, Ebtisam Awadh Alotaibi, Amerah Ayedh Alenazi, Hind Farhan Alanazi, Mariyyaha Mahdi Alanazi, Hani Rahail Alanazi, Mshari Anwar Alanezi, Latifah Rahail Alanazi
{"title":"Hand hygiene knowledge, beliefs, and practices among healthcare professionals in the primary healthcare centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Shuaa Rahail Alanazi, Abeer Jassam Alanazi, Mona Salem Alanazi, Fatima Rashid Alenazi, Nessreen Mohammed Algushiry, Ebtisam Awadh Alotaibi, Amerah Ayedh Alenazi, Hind Farhan Alanazi, Mariyyaha Mahdi Alanazi, Hani Rahail Alanazi, Mshari Anwar Alanezi, Latifah Rahail Alanazi","doi":"10.25122/jml-2025-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hand hygiene (HH) is vital for preventing healthcare-associated infections and ensuring patient safety. This study evaluated the knowledge, beliefs, and practices of healthcare professionals in primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using an online validated questionnaire based on the World Health Organization Hand Hygiene Knowledge Questionnaire. Data were analyzed to identify gaps and patterns across professional roles and demographics. A total of 221 healthcare professionals participated, 76% women and 24% men, 57% aged 30-39 years. Most had over 15 years of experience (33%), with nurses comprising the largest professional group. Nearly all participants (91%) had received HH training in the past 3 years, and 88% reported routine use of alcohol-based hand sanitizer. However, only 67% correctly identified the minimum time for alcohol-based sanitizer to kill germs, and misconceptions about hand rubbing efficacy persisted. The primary route of germ transmission was identified as healthcare workers' unclean hands. Most participants agreed that hand rubbing is faster than handwashing and emphasized HH after patient contact, exposure to body fluids, or contact with the patient's surroundings. Nearly all endorsed using both hand rubbing and handwashing for specific scenarios, such as before injections. This study highlights strong HH knowledge and adherence among healthcare workers in Riyadh PHCs, reflecting effective training programs. However, persistent misconceptions and knowledge gaps regarding germ transmission and hand rubbing efficacy require targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"18 4","pages":"332-337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2025-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hand hygiene (HH) is vital for preventing healthcare-associated infections and ensuring patient safety. This study evaluated the knowledge, beliefs, and practices of healthcare professionals in primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using an online validated questionnaire based on the World Health Organization Hand Hygiene Knowledge Questionnaire. Data were analyzed to identify gaps and patterns across professional roles and demographics. A total of 221 healthcare professionals participated, 76% women and 24% men, 57% aged 30-39 years. Most had over 15 years of experience (33%), with nurses comprising the largest professional group. Nearly all participants (91%) had received HH training in the past 3 years, and 88% reported routine use of alcohol-based hand sanitizer. However, only 67% correctly identified the minimum time for alcohol-based sanitizer to kill germs, and misconceptions about hand rubbing efficacy persisted. The primary route of germ transmission was identified as healthcare workers' unclean hands. Most participants agreed that hand rubbing is faster than handwashing and emphasized HH after patient contact, exposure to body fluids, or contact with the patient's surroundings. Nearly all endorsed using both hand rubbing and handwashing for specific scenarios, such as before injections. This study highlights strong HH knowledge and adherence among healthcare workers in Riyadh PHCs, reflecting effective training programs. However, persistent misconceptions and knowledge gaps regarding germ transmission and hand rubbing efficacy require targeted interventions.

沙特阿拉伯利雅得初级卫生保健中心卫生保健专业人员的手卫生知识、信念和做法:一项横断面研究。
手部卫生对于预防卫生保健相关感染和确保患者安全至关重要。本研究评估了沙特阿拉伯利雅得初级卫生保健中心(PHCs)卫生保健专业人员的知识、信念和做法。采用基于世界卫生组织手卫生知识问卷的在线有效问卷进行横断面描述性研究。对数据进行分析,以确定专业角色和人口统计数据之间的差距和模式。共有221名保健专业人员参与,76%为女性,24%为男性,57%为30-39岁。大多数有超过15年的工作经验(33%),其中护士是最大的专业群体。几乎所有参与者(91%)在过去3年中都接受过卫生培训,88%的人报告常规使用含酒精的洗手液。然而,只有67%的人正确地识别出含酒精的洗手液杀死细菌的最短时间,对洗手效果的误解仍然存在。确定了细菌传播的主要途径是卫生保健工作者不干净的手。大多数参与者同意,在接触病人、接触体液或接触病人周围环境后,搓手比洗手更快,并强调HH。几乎所有人都赞同在特定情况下,如注射前,同时搓手和洗手。这项研究突出表明,利雅得初级保健中心的卫生保健工作者具有很强的卫生保健知识和依从性,反映了有效的培训计划。然而,关于细菌传播和搓手功效的持续误解和知识空白需要有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信