Comparative Analysis of Maturation Prediction Methods (Moore, Mirwald, BAUSportTM): Croatian Female Volleyball Youth Team Example.

IF 2.5 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Drazen Cular, Tea Beslija, Marijana Cavala, Matej Babic, Ana Kezic
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Maturation Prediction Methods (Moore, Mirwald, BAUSport<sup>TM</sup>): Croatian Female Volleyball Youth Team Example.","authors":"Drazen Cular, Tea Beslija, Marijana Cavala, Matej Babic, Ana Kezic","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10020171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: The study aims to compare three distinct protocols-Moore, Mirwald, and the new BAUSport<sup>TM</sup> SonicBone system-for predicting somatic maturation in youth athletes. <b>Methods</b>: The participants were female members of the Croatian national volleyball youth team (U-17) (<i>n</i> = 16). The study involved comprehensive measurements, including height, weight, sitting height, leg length, wrist diameter, hand joint diameter, hand grip strength, and ultrasound measurements for skeletal age assessment. <b>Results</b>: Correlation analysis showed moderate to strong correlations between the Moore and Mirwald skeletal age estimates, but both showed weaker correlations with the BAUSport<sup>TM</sup> skeletal age. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed no significant difference between the Moore and Mirwald methods (<i>p</i> > 0.05); significant differences between both the Moore and Mirwald methods and the BAUSport<sup>TM</sup> method (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Regression analysis revealed that height, weight, sitting height, leg length, wrist diameter, and hand joint diameter explained 69% of BAUSport<sup>TM</sup>, with wrist diameter being the only significant predictor. While the Moore and Mirwald methods remain useful tools for estimating the timing of an athlete's growth spurt, BAUSport<sup>TM</sup> represents a potential advancement in skeletal age assessment. Further research is needed to validate BAUSport<sup>TM</sup> across diverse populations and optimize its calibration to accommodate anatomical variations. <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings suggest that with further refinement, BAUSport<sup>TM</sup> could become a new standard for monitoring skeletal development in youth athletes. Additionally, studies should explore comparative analyses with other emerging technologies, such as genetic markers, hormonal assessments, and MRI, for further understanding of biological maturation in talent identification.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study aims to compare three distinct protocols-Moore, Mirwald, and the new BAUSportTM SonicBone system-for predicting somatic maturation in youth athletes. Methods: The participants were female members of the Croatian national volleyball youth team (U-17) (n = 16). The study involved comprehensive measurements, including height, weight, sitting height, leg length, wrist diameter, hand joint diameter, hand grip strength, and ultrasound measurements for skeletal age assessment. Results: Correlation analysis showed moderate to strong correlations between the Moore and Mirwald skeletal age estimates, but both showed weaker correlations with the BAUSportTM skeletal age. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed no significant difference between the Moore and Mirwald methods (p > 0.05); significant differences between both the Moore and Mirwald methods and the BAUSportTM method (p < 0.05). Regression analysis revealed that height, weight, sitting height, leg length, wrist diameter, and hand joint diameter explained 69% of BAUSportTM, with wrist diameter being the only significant predictor. While the Moore and Mirwald methods remain useful tools for estimating the timing of an athlete's growth spurt, BAUSportTM represents a potential advancement in skeletal age assessment. Further research is needed to validate BAUSportTM across diverse populations and optimize its calibration to accommodate anatomical variations. Conclusions: The findings suggest that with further refinement, BAUSportTM could become a new standard for monitoring skeletal development in youth athletes. Additionally, studies should explore comparative analyses with other emerging technologies, such as genetic markers, hormonal assessments, and MRI, for further understanding of biological maturation in talent identification.

成熟度预测方法的比较分析(Moore, Mirwald, BAUSportTM):以克罗地亚女排青年队为例
目的:本研究旨在比较三种不同的方案——moore、Mirwald和新的BAUSportTM SonicBone系统——用于预测青少年运动员的体细胞成熟。方法:以克罗地亚国家排球青年队(U-17)女队员为研究对象(n = 16)。这项研究涉及综合测量,包括身高、体重、坐高、腿长、手腕直径、手关节直径、手握力,以及用于骨骼年龄评估的超声波测量。结果:相关分析显示Moore和Mirwald骨骼年龄估计值之间存在中度到强相关性,但两者与BAUSportTM骨骼年龄的相关性都较弱。重复测量方差分析显示Moore方法与Mirwald方法之间无显著差异(p < 0.05);Moore和Mirwald方法与BAUSportTM方法比较差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。回归分析显示,身高、体重、坐高、腿长、手腕直径和手关节直径解释了69%的BAUSportTM,手腕直径是唯一显著的预测因子。虽然Moore和Mirwald方法仍然是估计运动员生长突增时间的有用工具,但BAUSportTM代表了骨骼年龄评估的潜在进步。进一步的研究需要在不同的人群中验证BAUSportTM,并优化其校准以适应解剖差异。结论:研究结果表明,经过进一步完善,BAUSportTM可以成为监测青少年运动员骨骼发育的新标准。此外,研究应探索与其他新兴技术(如遗传标记、激素评估和MRI)的比较分析,以进一步了解人才识别中的生物成熟度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信