Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children: A 10-year Single-surgeon Study.

Q3 Medicine
Amar Shah, Ria Sharma, Anirudh Shah
{"title":"Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children: A 10-year Single-surgeon Study.","authors":"Amar Shah, Ria Sharma, Anirudh Shah","doi":"10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_272_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of this study were to compare surgical outcomes of conventional open inguinal hernia repair (OR) with laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia (LR) repair in Indian children operated by a single surgeon.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective (historical) nonrandomized cohort study of 1595 children with unilateral inguinal hernia for 10 years. All children who presented with unilateral inguinal hernia were included in this study. The study was divided into two phases of 5 years each, and patients were classified into Group 1 and Group 2. In the first 5 years (Group 1), all the children with unilateral inguinal hernia underwent conventional open repair. Over the next 5 years (Group 2), all the children with unilateral inguinal hernia underwent laparoscopic repair. All the operations were performed by the same surgeon who was well acquainted with laparoscopic surgery. Parameters studied included gender, side of the hernia, time of surgery, incidence of contralateral patent processus vaginalis (PPV), development of metachronous contralateral hernia, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1595 children with unilateral inguinal hernia were studied. Nine hundred and forty-five patients underwent OR (Group 1), and 650 patients underwent LR (Group 2). The male-to-female ratio in Group 1 was 2.5:1, and in Group 2 was 2.4:1. Right inguinal hernia was present in 59%, whereas 41% had a left inguinal hernia. In Group 1, 8% of children developed metachronous contralateral hernias. In Group 2, the contralateral processus vaginalis was found to be patent in 260 children. However, only 10% (26) of these children developed metachronous contralateral hernia on follow-up. In the present study, a significantly higher recurrence rate (2.5%) was observed in the LR group as compared to the OR group (0.3%). The overall operative time was lesser in the OR group (15 ± 8.4 min) versus LR group (25 ± 10 min).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only 10% of children with contralateral PPV in our study went on to develop a symptomatic hernia. Hence, we believe that upfront closure of the contralateral PPV with unilateral inguinal hernia may not be necessary. LR has a longer operating time and higher recurrence rates. The choice of technique depends on factors such as the availability of laparoscopic equipment and infrastructure, surgeon's preference, and expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":16069,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons","volume":"30 3","pages":"382-386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_272_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aims of this study were to compare surgical outcomes of conventional open inguinal hernia repair (OR) with laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia (LR) repair in Indian children operated by a single surgeon.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective (historical) nonrandomized cohort study of 1595 children with unilateral inguinal hernia for 10 years. All children who presented with unilateral inguinal hernia were included in this study. The study was divided into two phases of 5 years each, and patients were classified into Group 1 and Group 2. In the first 5 years (Group 1), all the children with unilateral inguinal hernia underwent conventional open repair. Over the next 5 years (Group 2), all the children with unilateral inguinal hernia underwent laparoscopic repair. All the operations were performed by the same surgeon who was well acquainted with laparoscopic surgery. Parameters studied included gender, side of the hernia, time of surgery, incidence of contralateral patent processus vaginalis (PPV), development of metachronous contralateral hernia, and complications.

Results: A total of 1595 children with unilateral inguinal hernia were studied. Nine hundred and forty-five patients underwent OR (Group 1), and 650 patients underwent LR (Group 2). The male-to-female ratio in Group 1 was 2.5:1, and in Group 2 was 2.4:1. Right inguinal hernia was present in 59%, whereas 41% had a left inguinal hernia. In Group 1, 8% of children developed metachronous contralateral hernias. In Group 2, the contralateral processus vaginalis was found to be patent in 260 children. However, only 10% (26) of these children developed metachronous contralateral hernia on follow-up. In the present study, a significantly higher recurrence rate (2.5%) was observed in the LR group as compared to the OR group (0.3%). The overall operative time was lesser in the OR group (15 ± 8.4 min) versus LR group (25 ± 10 min).

Conclusions: Only 10% of children with contralateral PPV in our study went on to develop a symptomatic hernia. Hence, we believe that upfront closure of the contralateral PPV with unilateral inguinal hernia may not be necessary. LR has a longer operating time and higher recurrence rates. The choice of technique depends on factors such as the availability of laparoscopic equipment and infrastructure, surgeon's preference, and expertise.

儿童腹腔镜与开放式腹股沟疝修补术的手术效果:一项10年单外科医生研究。
目的:本研究的目的是比较传统开放式腹股沟疝修补术(OR)与腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术(LR)在印度儿童中由单一外科医生操作的手术效果。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性(历史)非随机队列研究,1595名儿童单侧腹股沟疝10年。所有表现为单侧腹股沟疝的儿童都被纳入本研究。研究分为两期,每期5年,患者分为第1组和第2组。前5年(第一组),所有单侧腹股沟疝患儿均行常规开腹修补术。在接下来的5年中(第二组),所有单侧腹股沟疝患儿均行腹腔镜修补术。所有手术均由熟悉腹腔镜手术的同一位外科医生进行。研究参数包括性别、疝侧边、手术时间、对侧阴道突未闭发生率、异时性对侧疝发展及并发症。结果:对单侧腹股沟疝患儿1595例进行了研究。945例患者行OR(第一组),650例患者行LR(第二组)。组1男女比例为2.5:1,组2男女比例为2.4:1。右侧腹股沟疝占59%,左侧腹股沟疝占41%。在第1组中,8%的儿童发生异时性对侧疝。第二组260例患儿对侧阴道突未闭。然而,在随访中,这些儿童中只有10%(26)发生了异时性对侧疝。在本研究中,LR组的复发率(2.5%)明显高于OR组(0.3%)。OR组总手术时间(15±8.4 min)短于LR组(25±10 min)。结论:在我们的研究中,只有10%的对侧PPV患儿发展为有症状的疝气。因此,我们认为单侧腹股沟疝的对侧PPV可能没有必要预先关闭。LR手术时间长,复发率高。技术的选择取决于诸如腹腔镜设备和基础设施的可用性、外科医生的偏好和专业知识等因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons is the official organ of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The journal started its journey in October 1995 under the Editor-in-Chief Prof. Subir K Chatterjee. An advisory board was formed with well-versed internationally reputed senior members of our society like Late Prof. R K Gandhi, Prof. I C Pathak, Prof. P Upadhyay, Prof. T Dorairajan and many more. since then the journal is published quarterly uninterrupted. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, review articles and technical innovations. Special issues on different subjects are published every year. There have been several contributions from overseas experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信