May Patients with Chronic Stroke Benefit from Robotic Gait Training with an End-Effector? A Case-Control Study.

IF 2.5 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Mirjam Bonanno, Paolo De Pasquale, Antonino Lombardo Facciale, Biagio Dauccio, Rosaria De Luca, Angelo Quartarone, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
{"title":"May Patients with Chronic Stroke Benefit from Robotic Gait Training with an End-Effector? A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Mirjam Bonanno, Paolo De Pasquale, Antonino Lombardo Facciale, Biagio Dauccio, Rosaria De Luca, Angelo Quartarone, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10020161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Gait and balance alterations in post-stroke patients are one of the most disabling symptoms that can persist in chronic stages of the disease. In this context, rehabilitation has the fundamental role of promoting functional recovery, mitigating gait and balance deficits, and preventing falling risk. Robotic end-effector devices, like the G-EO system (e.g., G-EO system, Reha Technology, Olten, Switzerland), can be a useful device to promote gait recovery in patients with chronic stroke. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Twelve chronic stroke patients were enrolled and evaluated at baseline (T0) and at post-treatment (T1). These patients received forty sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) with the G-EO system (experimental group, EG), for eight weeks consecutively, in addition to standard rehabilitation therapy. The data of these subjects were compared with those coming from a sample of twelve individuals (control group, CG) matched for clinical and demographic features who underwent the same amount of conventional gait training (CGT), in addition to standard rehabilitation therapy. <b>Results:</b> All patients completed the trial, and none reported any side effects either during or following the training. The EG showed significant improvements in balance (<i>p</i> = 0.012) and gait (<i>p</i> = 0.004) functions measured with the Tinetti Scale (TS) after RGT. Both groups (EG and CG) showed significant improvement in functional independence (FIM, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) showed significant improvements in motor function (<i>p</i> = 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.031) and passive range of motion (<i>p</i> = 0.031) in EG. In EG, gait and balance improvements were influenced by session, age, gender, time since injury (TSI), cadence, and velocity (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while CG showed fewer significant effects, mainly for age, TSI, and session. EG showed significantly greater improvements than CG in balance (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and gait (<i>p</i> = 0.05) based on the TS. <b>Conclusions:</b> RGT with end-effectors, like the G-EO system, can be a valuable complementary treatment in neurorehabilitation, even for chronic stroke patients. Our findings suggest that RGT may improve gait, balance, and lower limb motor functions, enhancing motor control and coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gait and balance alterations in post-stroke patients are one of the most disabling symptoms that can persist in chronic stages of the disease. In this context, rehabilitation has the fundamental role of promoting functional recovery, mitigating gait and balance deficits, and preventing falling risk. Robotic end-effector devices, like the G-EO system (e.g., G-EO system, Reha Technology, Olten, Switzerland), can be a useful device to promote gait recovery in patients with chronic stroke. Materials and Methods: Twelve chronic stroke patients were enrolled and evaluated at baseline (T0) and at post-treatment (T1). These patients received forty sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) with the G-EO system (experimental group, EG), for eight weeks consecutively, in addition to standard rehabilitation therapy. The data of these subjects were compared with those coming from a sample of twelve individuals (control group, CG) matched for clinical and demographic features who underwent the same amount of conventional gait training (CGT), in addition to standard rehabilitation therapy. Results: All patients completed the trial, and none reported any side effects either during or following the training. The EG showed significant improvements in balance (p = 0.012) and gait (p = 0.004) functions measured with the Tinetti Scale (TS) after RGT. Both groups (EG and CG) showed significant improvement in functional independence (FIM, p < 0.001). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) showed significant improvements in motor function (p = 0.001, p = 0.031) and passive range of motion (p = 0.031) in EG. In EG, gait and balance improvements were influenced by session, age, gender, time since injury (TSI), cadence, and velocity (p < 0.05), while CG showed fewer significant effects, mainly for age, TSI, and session. EG showed significantly greater improvements than CG in balance (p = 0.003) and gait (p = 0.05) based on the TS. Conclusions: RGT with end-effectors, like the G-EO system, can be a valuable complementary treatment in neurorehabilitation, even for chronic stroke patients. Our findings suggest that RGT may improve gait, balance, and lower limb motor functions, enhancing motor control and coordination.

带末端执行器的机器人步态训练是否对慢性中风患者有益?病例对照研究。
背景:卒中后患者的步态和平衡改变是最致残的症状之一,可持续到疾病的慢性阶段。在这种情况下,康复具有促进功能恢复、减轻步态和平衡缺陷以及预防跌倒风险的基本作用。机器人末端执行器设备,如G-EO系统(例如,G-EO系统,Reha Technology, Olten, Switzerland),可以成为促进慢性中风患者步态恢复的有用设备。材料和方法:纳入12例慢性脑卒中患者,并在基线(T0)和治疗后(T1)进行评估。除了标准的康复治疗外,这些患者还接受了40次G-EO系统的机器人步态训练(RGT)(实验组,EG),连续8周。这些受试者的数据与来自12个样本(对照组,CG)的数据进行了比较,这些样本的临床和人口学特征相匹配,除了标准的康复治疗外,他们还接受了相同数量的常规步态训练(CGT)。结果:所有患者都完成了试验,在训练期间或训练后没有报告任何副作用。RGT后EG在平衡(p = 0.012)和步态(p = 0.004)功能上有显著改善。两组(EG组和CG组)功能独立性均有显著改善(FIM, p < 0.001)。Fugl-Meyer评估-下肢(FMA-LE)显示EG的运动功能(p = 0.001, p = 0.031)和被动运动范围(p = 0.031)有显著改善。在EG中,步态和平衡改善受运动时间、年龄、性别、受伤时间(TSI)、节奏和速度的影响(p < 0.05),而CG的影响较小,主要受年龄、TSI和运动时间的影响。在TS的基础上,EG在平衡(p = 0.003)和步态(p = 0.05)方面的改善明显大于CG。结论:带有末端执行器的RGT,如G-EO系统,可以作为一种有价值的神经康复辅助治疗,即使对慢性卒中患者也是如此。我们的研究结果表明,RGT可以改善步态,平衡和下肢运动功能,增强运动控制和协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信