Quality Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: A Joint Position Statement.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Linda S Yang, Abir Halder, Bronte A Holt, Benedict Devereaux, Matthew Remedios, Neil Merrett, Marianne Lill, Zoe Raos, Malcolm Arnold, Nicholas G Burgess, Sneha John, Krish Ragunath
{"title":"Quality Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: A Joint Position Statement.","authors":"Linda S Yang, Abir Halder, Bronte A Holt, Benedict Devereaux, Matthew Remedios, Neil Merrett, Marianne Lill, Zoe Raos, Malcolm Arnold, Nicholas G Burgess, Sneha John, Krish Ragunath","doi":"10.1111/jgh.17013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quality standards for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy are required to identify key quality indicators that are relevant to Australasian endoscopic practice and local patient populations. Such standards will promote equitable access to high-quality UGI endoscopy for appropriate indications across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The Gastroenterological Society of Australia (GESA) Endoscopy Faculty's quality of UGI endoscopy working group conducted a review of published guidelines on quality standards in UGI endoscopy. A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE database, with further references sourced from bibliographies of published papers. Recommendations from international guidelines and available evidence were reviewed, and their relevance to the Australian clinical context was assessed. The working group then formulated a position statement on quality assurance in UGI endoscopy in Australian practice. A further iterative process involving the Endoscopy Guidance Group for New Zealand (EGGNZ) and the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) culminated in the final recommendations for practice in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The recommendations in this position statement are categorized into preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural. As UGI endoscopy examines several anatomical structures and is performed for a wider range of indications than colonoscopy, disease-specific intraprocedural recommendations for common benign and premalignant conditions of the UGI tract are also presented. This GESA initiative was undertaken in collaboration with the RACS and endorsed by GESA, RACS, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, and EGGNZ, membership of which includes the New Zealand Society of Gastroenterology, the New Zealand Association of General Surgeons, and other local endoscopy stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.17013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quality standards for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy are required to identify key quality indicators that are relevant to Australasian endoscopic practice and local patient populations. Such standards will promote equitable access to high-quality UGI endoscopy for appropriate indications across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The Gastroenterological Society of Australia (GESA) Endoscopy Faculty's quality of UGI endoscopy working group conducted a review of published guidelines on quality standards in UGI endoscopy. A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE database, with further references sourced from bibliographies of published papers. Recommendations from international guidelines and available evidence were reviewed, and their relevance to the Australian clinical context was assessed. The working group then formulated a position statement on quality assurance in UGI endoscopy in Australian practice. A further iterative process involving the Endoscopy Guidance Group for New Zealand (EGGNZ) and the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) culminated in the final recommendations for practice in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The recommendations in this position statement are categorized into preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural. As UGI endoscopy examines several anatomical structures and is performed for a wider range of indications than colonoscopy, disease-specific intraprocedural recommendations for common benign and premalignant conditions of the UGI tract are also presented. This GESA initiative was undertaken in collaboration with the RACS and endorsed by GESA, RACS, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, and EGGNZ, membership of which includes the New Zealand Society of Gastroenterology, the New Zealand Association of General Surgeons, and other local endoscopy stakeholders.

澳大利亚和新西兰的上消化道内镜检查质量:联合立场声明。
需要制定上胃肠道(UGI)内窥镜检查的质量标准,以确定与澳大利亚内窥镜检查实践和当地患者群体相关的关键质量指标。这些标准将促进澳大利亚和新西兰各地公平获得高质量UGI内窥镜检查的适当适应症。澳大利亚胃肠病学学会(GESA)内窥镜学院UGI内窥镜质量工作组对UGI内窥镜质量标准的出版指南进行了审查。使用MEDLINE数据库进行文献检索,进一步的参考文献来自已发表论文的参考书目。审查了国际指南和现有证据的建议,并评估了它们与澳大利亚临床背景的相关性。工作组随后制定了一份关于澳大利亚UGI内窥镜质量保证的立场声明。新西兰内窥镜指导小组(EGGNZ)和澳大利亚皇家外科医生学院(RACS)参与的进一步迭代过程最终形成了澳大利亚和新西兰Aotearoa的最终实践建议。本立场声明中的建议分为程序前、程序内和程序后。由于UGI内窥镜检查了几种解剖结构,并且比结肠镜检查的适应症范围更广,因此也提出了针对UGI尿道常见良性和恶性前病变的疾病特异性术中建议。这项GESA倡议是与RACS合作开展的,并得到了GESA、RACS、澳大拉西亚皇家医师学院和EGGNZ的认可,EGGNZ的成员包括新西兰消化病学学会、新西兰普通外科医生协会和其他当地内窥镜利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信