Humoral and Cell-Mediated Immunity Against SARS-CoV-2 in Healthcare Personnel Who Received Multiple mRNA Vaccines: A 4-Year Observational Study.

IF 3.4 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hideaki Kato, Kaori Sano, Kei Miyakawa, Takayuki Kurosawa, Kazuo Horikawa, Yayoi Kimura, Atsushi Goto, Akihide Ryo
{"title":"Humoral and Cell-Mediated Immunity Against SARS-CoV-2 in Healthcare Personnel Who Received Multiple mRNA Vaccines: A 4-Year Observational Study.","authors":"Hideaki Kato, Kaori Sano, Kei Miyakawa, Takayuki Kurosawa, Kazuo Horikawa, Yayoi Kimura, Atsushi Goto, Akihide Ryo","doi":"10.3390/idr17030042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The long-term effects of multiple updated vaccinations against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) have not been clarified. Humoral or cellular immunity dynamics in healthcare workers for four years were analyzed. <b>Methods:</b> Blood samples were collected at five time points from April 2021 to January 2024. Humoral immunity was analyzed using the 50% neutralizing titer (NT<sub>50</sub>) against the original Omicron XBB and Omicron BA.2.86 strains and cellular immunity were analyzed using the ELISpot interferon-gamma releasing assay. NT<sub>50</sub>s and the spot-forming count (SFC) of the ELISpot assay were compared in the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB-, Omicron-infected, and uninfected subjects. <b>Results</b>: 32 healthcare workers (median age, 47 years) who received 3-7 vaccine doses were enrolled. The NT<sub>50</sub>s against the original strain decreased after the second vaccination but were maintained after the third vaccine dose. NT<sub>50</sub>s against the Omicron XBB and BA.2.86 strains were detected before the Omicron vaccine was introduced and increased following the updated vaccination. The NT<sub>50</sub>s against the Omicron XBB and BA.2.86 strains were elevated after natural infection by the Omicron strain, albeit without differences compared with the findings in uninfected subjects. Multivariate regression analysis revealed no confounder that affected the antibody titer against the BA.2.86 strain at the fifth blood sampling. The median number of SFCs ranged from 78 to 208 after the first two doses. <b>Conclusions</b>: Multiple vaccinations induced the production of antibodies with divergent activity against emerging mutant strains and enhanced protective effects against the original strain. This finding supported the importance of updated vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":13579,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Disease Reports","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17030042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The long-term effects of multiple updated vaccinations against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) have not been clarified. Humoral or cellular immunity dynamics in healthcare workers for four years were analyzed. Methods: Blood samples were collected at five time points from April 2021 to January 2024. Humoral immunity was analyzed using the 50% neutralizing titer (NT50) against the original Omicron XBB and Omicron BA.2.86 strains and cellular immunity were analyzed using the ELISpot interferon-gamma releasing assay. NT50s and the spot-forming count (SFC) of the ELISpot assay were compared in the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB-, Omicron-infected, and uninfected subjects. Results: 32 healthcare workers (median age, 47 years) who received 3-7 vaccine doses were enrolled. The NT50s against the original strain decreased after the second vaccination but were maintained after the third vaccine dose. NT50s against the Omicron XBB and BA.2.86 strains were detected before the Omicron vaccine was introduced and increased following the updated vaccination. The NT50s against the Omicron XBB and BA.2.86 strains were elevated after natural infection by the Omicron strain, albeit without differences compared with the findings in uninfected subjects. Multivariate regression analysis revealed no confounder that affected the antibody titer against the BA.2.86 strain at the fifth blood sampling. The median number of SFCs ranged from 78 to 208 after the first two doses. Conclusions: Multiple vaccinations induced the production of antibodies with divergent activity against emerging mutant strains and enhanced protective effects against the original strain. This finding supported the importance of updated vaccination.

接受多种mRNA疫苗的医护人员对SARS-CoV-2的体液和细胞介导免疫:一项为期4年的观察研究
背景/目的:针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)的多次更新疫苗接种的长期效果尚未明确。分析了卫生保健工作者4年的体液或细胞免疫动力学。方法:于2021年4月至2024年1月5个时间点采集血样。采用50%中和效价(NT50)对原Omicron XBB和Omicron BA.2.86菌株进行体液免疫分析,采用ELISpot干扰素释放法分析细胞免疫。比较了SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB-、Omicron感染和未感染受试者的NT50s和ELISpot法的斑点形成计数(SFC)。结果:32名卫生保健工作者(中位年龄47岁)接受了3-7剂疫苗。在第二次疫苗接种后,对原始菌株的nt50降低,但在第三次疫苗接种后保持不变。在引入Omicron疫苗之前检测到针对Omicron XBB和BA.2.86菌株的nt50,并在更新疫苗接种后增加。自然感染Omicron菌株后,对Omicron XBB和BA.2.86菌株的NT50s升高,但与未感染的受试者相比无差异。多因素回归分析显示,在第五次采血时,没有混杂因素影响BA.2.86菌株的抗体滴度。前两次剂量后,sfc的中位数为78 - 208个。结论:多次接种诱导产生的抗体对新出现的突变株具有不同的活性,并增强了对原始菌株的保护作用。这一发现支持了更新疫苗接种的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Disease Reports
Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信