Developing and validating a diagnostic threshold for central blood pressure in assessing cardiovascular risks.

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Shuqi Wang, Samuel Y S Wong, Benjamin H K Yip, Eric K P Lee
{"title":"Developing and validating a diagnostic threshold for central blood pressure in assessing cardiovascular risks.","authors":"Shuqi Wang, Samuel Y S Wong, Benjamin H K Yip, Eric K P Lee","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to establish an outcome-derived threshold for central blood pressure (cBP) and evaluate its clinical utility in stratifying cardiovascular (CVD) risk.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of 34 289 adults without prior CVD was conducted using the UK Biobank dataset. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal cardiovascular events. Diagnostic threshold for cBP was developed by bootstrap and approximation methods, based on the current brachial BP. Cox regression models were employed to evaluate the clinical utility of diagnostic thresholds for cBP in predicting in CVD. A diagnostic threshold of 135 mmHg for central systolic blood pressure (SBP) corresponded to the threshold of 140 mmHg for brachial SBP. Simultaneous assessment of brachial and central SBP configurated following categories: brachial and central normotension (49.84%), isolated brachial hypertension (2.23%), isolated central hypertension (3.65%) and concordant brachial and central hypertension (44.28%). Compared with concordant normotension, hazard ratios for cardiovascular events were 0.81 (0.45, 1.44) for isolated brachial hypertension, 1.70 (1.23, 2.35) for isolated central hypertension and 1.51 (1.30, 1.76) for concordant hypertension. The inclusion of cBP improved model fit and discrimination for predicting CVD beyond brachial BP alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study established a diagnostic threshold of 135 mmHg for central SBP. Individuals with central HT exhibited elevated risks of CVD, regardless of brachial HT status. Incorporating central BP enhanced the prediction of CVD risk beyond traditional BP measurement alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1335-1343"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to establish an outcome-derived threshold for central blood pressure (cBP) and evaluate its clinical utility in stratifying cardiovascular (CVD) risk.

Methods and results: A retrospective cohort study of 34 289 adults without prior CVD was conducted using the UK Biobank dataset. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal cardiovascular events. Diagnostic threshold for cBP was developed by bootstrap and approximation methods, based on the current brachial BP. Cox regression models were employed to evaluate the clinical utility of diagnostic thresholds for cBP in predicting in CVD. A diagnostic threshold of 135 mmHg for central systolic blood pressure (SBP) corresponded to the threshold of 140 mmHg for brachial SBP. Simultaneous assessment of brachial and central SBP configurated following categories: brachial and central normotension (49.84%), isolated brachial hypertension (2.23%), isolated central hypertension (3.65%) and concordant brachial and central hypertension (44.28%). Compared with concordant normotension, hazard ratios for cardiovascular events were 0.81 (0.45, 1.44) for isolated brachial hypertension, 1.70 (1.23, 2.35) for isolated central hypertension and 1.51 (1.30, 1.76) for concordant hypertension. The inclusion of cBP improved model fit and discrimination for predicting CVD beyond brachial BP alone.

Conclusion: This study established a diagnostic threshold of 135 mmHg for central SBP. Individuals with central HT exhibited elevated risks of CVD, regardless of brachial HT status. Incorporating central BP enhanced the prediction of CVD risk beyond traditional BP measurement alone.

开发和验证中心血压在评估心血管风险中的诊断阈值。
目的:本研究旨在建立中心血压(cBP)的结果衍生阈值,并评估其在心血管(CVD)风险分层中的临床应用。方法和结果:使用UK Biobank数据集对34,289名既往无心血管疾病的成年人进行回顾性队列研究。主要终点是心血管死亡率和非致死性心血管事件的综合。基于当前的肱BP,采用自举法和近似法建立了cBP的诊断阈值。采用Cox回归模型评估cBP诊断阈值在预测CVD中的临床应用。中枢收缩压的诊断阈值为135 mmHg,肱收缩压的诊断阈值为140 mmHg。同时评估肱和中枢性收缩压可分为以下类别:肱和中枢性血压正常(49.84%),孤立性肱高血压(2.23%),孤立性中枢性高血压(3.65%)和一致性肱和中枢性高血压(44.28%)。与一致性血压正常者相比,孤立性肱高血压患者心血管事件的危险比为0.81(0.45,1.44),孤立性中枢性高血压患者为1.70(1.23,2.35),一致性高血压患者为1.51(1.30,1.76)。纳入cBP改善了模型拟合和判别预测CVD超出单臂血压。结论:本研究建立了135 mmHg的中枢性收缩压诊断阈值。中枢性HT个体表现出CVD风险升高,与肱HT状态无关。与传统的单独血压测量相比,结合中心血压可以提高心血管疾病风险的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信