Human-machine collaborative risk assessment model for thyroid nodules based on local attention and multi-scale feature extraction: a multi-center clinical study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Shunlan Liu, Yang Yang, Mingli Cai, Zhirong Xu, Shaozheng He, Qichen Su, Peizhong Liu, Guorong Lyu
{"title":"Human-machine collaborative risk assessment model for thyroid nodules based on local attention and multi-scale feature extraction: a multi-center clinical study.","authors":"Shunlan Liu, Yang Yang, Mingli Cai, Zhirong Xu, Shaozheng He, Qichen Su, Peizhong Liu, Guorong Lyu","doi":"10.1007/s12020-025-04278-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate a human-machine collaborative risk assessment model for thyroid nodules using local attention mechanisms and multi-scale feature extraction and compare its performance with those of radiologists of varying experience levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-center diagnostic study was conducted using ultrasound image datasets from six hospitals in China. The model was trained on 8397 images from 8063 patients (training set) and validated on 253 images from 245 patients across multiple centers. The diagnostic performance of the model was compared with those of radiologists with varying levels of experience. An assistive strategy was developed where radiologists adjusted their diagnoses based on model results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model achieved recognition accuracies of 0.966, 0.809, 0.826, 0.837, and 0.861 for composition, echogenicity, margin, echogenic foci, and orientation, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the model in diagnosing benign and malignant nodules was 0.882, significantly higher than that of the junior radiologist (0.789; P < 0.0001). The AUROC of the model was between that of the intermediate (0.837) and senior (0.892) radiologists, with no significant difference compared to either group (both P > 0.05). The assistive strategy improved the AUROC for the junior radiologist from 0.789 to 0.859 (P < 0.0001) and increased sensitivity from 66.11% to 80.00% (P < 0.05), with specificity unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model accurately identified thyroid nodule risk features and enhanced diagnostic performance, particularly for the junior radiologist, improving sensitivity in diagnosing thyroid nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":11572,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-025-04278-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate a human-machine collaborative risk assessment model for thyroid nodules using local attention mechanisms and multi-scale feature extraction and compare its performance with those of radiologists of varying experience levels.

Methods: A multi-center diagnostic study was conducted using ultrasound image datasets from six hospitals in China. The model was trained on 8397 images from 8063 patients (training set) and validated on 253 images from 245 patients across multiple centers. The diagnostic performance of the model was compared with those of radiologists with varying levels of experience. An assistive strategy was developed where radiologists adjusted their diagnoses based on model results.

Results: The model achieved recognition accuracies of 0.966, 0.809, 0.826, 0.837, and 0.861 for composition, echogenicity, margin, echogenic foci, and orientation, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the model in diagnosing benign and malignant nodules was 0.882, significantly higher than that of the junior radiologist (0.789; P < 0.0001). The AUROC of the model was between that of the intermediate (0.837) and senior (0.892) radiologists, with no significant difference compared to either group (both P > 0.05). The assistive strategy improved the AUROC for the junior radiologist from 0.789 to 0.859 (P < 0.0001) and increased sensitivity from 66.11% to 80.00% (P < 0.05), with specificity unchanged.

Conclusion: The model accurately identified thyroid nodule risk features and enhanced diagnostic performance, particularly for the junior radiologist, improving sensitivity in diagnosing thyroid nodules.

基于局部关注和多尺度特征提取的甲状腺结节人机协同风险评估模型:一项多中心临床研究
目的:我们旨在利用局部注意机制和多尺度特征提取来评估甲状腺结节的人机协作风险评估模型,并将其性能与不同经验水平的放射科医生的性能进行比较。方法:利用中国6家医院的超声图像数据集进行多中心诊断研究。该模型在来自8063名患者(训练集)的8397张图像上进行训练,并在来自多个中心的245名患者的253张图像上进行验证。将该模型的诊断性能与具有不同经验水平的放射科医生的诊断性能进行比较。一种辅助策略被开发出来,放射科医生根据模型结果调整他们的诊断。结果:该模型在成分、回波强度、边缘、回波病灶和方位的识别精度分别为0.966、0.809、0.826、0.837和0.861。该模型诊断良恶性结节的受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.882,显著高于初级放射科医师(0.789;P 0.05)。辅助策略使初级放射科医生的AUROC从0.789提高到0.859 (P)。结论:该模型准确地识别了甲状腺结节的风险特征,提高了诊断性能,特别是对初级放射科医生,提高了诊断甲状腺结节的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine
Endocrine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology. Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted. Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信