Julie Leth-Petersen, Karin Sundberg, Charlotte Kvist Ekelund, Olav Bjørn Petersen, Lone Nikoline Nørgaard, Lisa Neerup Jensen, Lotte Harmsen, Martin G Tolsgaard
{"title":"Creation of stakeholder value at a tertiary foetal medicine centre.","authors":"Julie Leth-Petersen, Karin Sundberg, Charlotte Kvist Ekelund, Olav Bjørn Petersen, Lone Nikoline Nørgaard, Lisa Neerup Jensen, Lotte Harmsen, Martin G Tolsgaard","doi":"10.61409/A11240830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Little is known about how a tertiary foetal medicine unit creates value for its stakeholders. This study explored stakeholder perspectives to uncover nuances in value creation within a highly specialised unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional exploratory survey was conducted at the Foetal Medicine Unit at Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Denmark. Participants included patients, clinicians, referring hospitals, international partners and administrators. Questionnaires were designed by specialists, and data analysed using logistic regression and descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study surveyed patients (104, 64.2% response rate) and healthcare providers: internal (13/19, 63.2%), national (27/29, 93.1%), international (20/27, 74.1%) and administrators (5/11, 45.4%). Stakeholders emphasised the importance of specialised training. While patients accepted trainee involvement, most preferred certified specialists. Patients referred for pregnancy complications had significantly higher expectations of physician expertise than routine screenings (odds ratio = 2.58 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-5.88), p = 0.02). Key success metrics were patient outcomes, staff satisfaction and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discrepancies were found between patients' acceptance of trainee involvement and their preference for certified specialists. Patients referred for complications had even higher expectations of physician expertise. Patient outcomes, patient satisfaction and staff satisfaction were consistently identified as the most important success indicators.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"72 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A11240830","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Little is known about how a tertiary foetal medicine unit creates value for its stakeholders. This study explored stakeholder perspectives to uncover nuances in value creation within a highly specialised unit.
Methods: A cross-sectional exploratory survey was conducted at the Foetal Medicine Unit at Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Denmark. Participants included patients, clinicians, referring hospitals, international partners and administrators. Questionnaires were designed by specialists, and data analysed using logistic regression and descriptive statistics.
Results: The study surveyed patients (104, 64.2% response rate) and healthcare providers: internal (13/19, 63.2%), national (27/29, 93.1%), international (20/27, 74.1%) and administrators (5/11, 45.4%). Stakeholders emphasised the importance of specialised training. While patients accepted trainee involvement, most preferred certified specialists. Patients referred for pregnancy complications had significantly higher expectations of physician expertise than routine screenings (odds ratio = 2.58 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-5.88), p = 0.02). Key success metrics were patient outcomes, staff satisfaction and patient satisfaction.
Conclusions: Discrepancies were found between patients' acceptance of trainee involvement and their preference for certified specialists. Patients referred for complications had even higher expectations of physician expertise. Patient outcomes, patient satisfaction and staff satisfaction were consistently identified as the most important success indicators.
期刊介绍:
The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content.
DMJ will publish the following articles:
• Original articles
• Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials
• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
• PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences
• DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.