Creation of stakeholder value at a tertiary foetal medicine centre.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Julie Leth-Petersen, Karin Sundberg, Charlotte Kvist Ekelund, Olav Bjørn Petersen, Lone Nikoline Nørgaard, Lisa Neerup Jensen, Lotte Harmsen, Martin G Tolsgaard
{"title":"Creation of stakeholder value at a tertiary foetal medicine centre.","authors":"Julie Leth-Petersen, Karin Sundberg, Charlotte Kvist Ekelund, Olav Bjørn Petersen, Lone Nikoline Nørgaard, Lisa Neerup Jensen, Lotte Harmsen, Martin G Tolsgaard","doi":"10.61409/A11240830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Little is known about how a tertiary foetal medicine unit creates value for its stakeholders. This study explored stakeholder perspectives to uncover nuances in value creation within a highly specialised unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional exploratory survey was conducted at the Foetal Medicine Unit at Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Denmark. Participants included patients, clinicians, referring hospitals, international partners and administrators. Questionnaires were designed by specialists, and data analysed using logistic regression and descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study surveyed patients (104, 64.2% response rate) and healthcare providers: internal (13/19, 63.2%), national (27/29, 93.1%), international (20/27, 74.1%) and administrators (5/11, 45.4%). Stakeholders emphasised the importance of specialised training. While patients accepted trainee involvement, most preferred certified specialists. Patients referred for pregnancy complications had significantly higher expectations of physician expertise than routine screenings (odds ratio = 2.58 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-5.88), p = 0.02). Key success metrics were patient outcomes, staff satisfaction and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discrepancies were found between patients' acceptance of trainee involvement and their preference for certified specialists. Patients referred for complications had even higher expectations of physician expertise. Patient outcomes, patient satisfaction and staff satisfaction were consistently identified as the most important success indicators.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"72 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A11240830","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Little is known about how a tertiary foetal medicine unit creates value for its stakeholders. This study explored stakeholder perspectives to uncover nuances in value creation within a highly specialised unit.

Methods: A cross-sectional exploratory survey was conducted at the Foetal Medicine Unit at Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Denmark. Participants included patients, clinicians, referring hospitals, international partners and administrators. Questionnaires were designed by specialists, and data analysed using logistic regression and descriptive statistics.

Results: The study surveyed patients (104, 64.2% response rate) and healthcare providers: internal (13/19, 63.2%), national (27/29, 93.1%), international (20/27, 74.1%) and administrators (5/11, 45.4%). Stakeholders emphasised the importance of specialised training. While patients accepted trainee involvement, most preferred certified specialists. Patients referred for pregnancy complications had significantly higher expectations of physician expertise than routine screenings (odds ratio = 2.58 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-5.88), p = 0.02). Key success metrics were patient outcomes, staff satisfaction and patient satisfaction.

Conclusions: Discrepancies were found between patients' acceptance of trainee involvement and their preference for certified specialists. Patients referred for complications had even higher expectations of physician expertise. Patient outcomes, patient satisfaction and staff satisfaction were consistently identified as the most important success indicators.

Funding: None.

Trial registration: Not relevant.

在第三级胎儿医学中心创造利益相关者价值。
引言:很少知道一个三级胎儿医学单位如何为其利益相关者创造价值。本研究探讨了利益相关者的观点,以揭示高度专业化单位内价值创造的细微差别。方法:在丹麦哥本哈根大学医院(Rigshospitalet)胎儿医学部进行横断面探索性调查。参与者包括患者、临床医生、转诊医院、国际合作伙伴和管理人员。问卷由专家设计,数据分析采用逻辑回归和描述性统计。结果:该研究调查了患者(104,有效率为64.2%)和医疗保健提供者:内部(13/19,63.2%),国内(27/29,93.1%),国际(20/27,74.1%)和管理人员(5/11,45.4%)。利益攸关方强调了专门培训的重要性。虽然患者接受实习医生的介入,但大多数人更喜欢经过认证的专家。因妊娠并发症转诊的患者对医师专业知识的期望明显高于常规筛查(优势比= 2.58(95%可信区间:1.13-5.88),p = 0.02)。关键的成功指标是患者结果、工作人员满意度和患者满意度。结论:患者对实习医生参与的接受程度与他们对认证专家的偏好之间存在差异。因并发症转诊的患者对医生的专业知识有更高的期望。患者结果、患者满意度和工作人员满意度一直被认为是最重要的成功指标。资金:没有。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信