Patient characteristics and pharmacologic treatment patterns in antifibrotic-treated patients with fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: real-world results from a claims database.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yasuhiro Kondoh, Tomohiro Ito, Hana Kimura, Haikun Bao, Masataka Kuwana
{"title":"Patient characteristics and pharmacologic treatment patterns in antifibrotic-treated patients with fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: real-world results from a claims database.","authors":"Yasuhiro Kondoh, Tomohiro Ito, Hana Kimura, Haikun Bao, Masataka Kuwana","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03713-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antifibrotics have been approved for use in many countries, including Japan, based on the results of several phase III clinical trials in patients with IPF, SSc-ILD, and PPF, which showed slower lung function decline with antifibrotic treatment. There is a paucity of information on the real-world use of antifibrotics in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and drugs used prior to and concomitant with antifibrotics were collected for patients with IPF, SSc-ILD, and PPF using a health insurance claims database in Japan from 1 January 2013 to 30 June 2023. Descriptive statistics were generated for all study variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 657 nintedanib users with IPF; 418 pirfenidone users with IPF; 4160 nintedanib users with PPF; 18,403 users of glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants for ILD treatment with PPF; 676 nintedanib users with SSc-ILD; and 698 users of glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants for ILD treatment with SSc-ILD. At index, pirfenidone users with IPF were the oldest (mean [SD] 74.8 [7.3] years), and nintedanib users with SSc-ILD were the youngest (mean [SD] 65.6 [11.7] years). In nintedanib users with IPF, 76.7% were prescribed nintedanib as monotherapy, and 75.6% of pirfenidone users were prescribed pirfenidone, as monotherapy. In patients with IPF, 75.2% were prescribed nintedanib, and 76.1% were prescribed pirfenidone, as first-line therapy. In patients with SSc-ILD, 34.9% were prescribed nintedanib as monotherapy for ILD treatment, and 38.6% as first-line therapy. Approximately half of patients with PPF were prescribed nintedanib concomitantly with other glucocorticoids/immunosuppressant drugs, and after one or more glucocorticoids/immunosuppressant drugs. The most common concomitant drug in all patient groups was glucocorticoids. In patients with IPF, 18.6% of nintedanib users and 18.2% of pirfenidone users were prescribed glucocorticoids concomitantly. Concomitant glucocorticoid use was 52.7% for nintedanib users with SSc-ILD, and 44.1% for nintedanib users with PPF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results provide real-world evidence of antifibrotic use in clinical practice. Most patients with IPF were prescribed antifibrotics as monotherapy for ILD treatment whereas antifibrotics were used concomitantly with glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants in many patients with SSc-ILD and PPF. While most patients with IPF were prescribed antifibrotics as first-line therapy, patients with SSc-ILD and PPF were more likely to be prescribed nintedanib as second-line or later-line treatment after glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03713-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antifibrotics have been approved for use in many countries, including Japan, based on the results of several phase III clinical trials in patients with IPF, SSc-ILD, and PPF, which showed slower lung function decline with antifibrotic treatment. There is a paucity of information on the real-world use of antifibrotics in clinical practice.

Methods: Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and drugs used prior to and concomitant with antifibrotics were collected for patients with IPF, SSc-ILD, and PPF using a health insurance claims database in Japan from 1 January 2013 to 30 June 2023. Descriptive statistics were generated for all study variables.

Results: This study included 657 nintedanib users with IPF; 418 pirfenidone users with IPF; 4160 nintedanib users with PPF; 18,403 users of glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants for ILD treatment with PPF; 676 nintedanib users with SSc-ILD; and 698 users of glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants for ILD treatment with SSc-ILD. At index, pirfenidone users with IPF were the oldest (mean [SD] 74.8 [7.3] years), and nintedanib users with SSc-ILD were the youngest (mean [SD] 65.6 [11.7] years). In nintedanib users with IPF, 76.7% were prescribed nintedanib as monotherapy, and 75.6% of pirfenidone users were prescribed pirfenidone, as monotherapy. In patients with IPF, 75.2% were prescribed nintedanib, and 76.1% were prescribed pirfenidone, as first-line therapy. In patients with SSc-ILD, 34.9% were prescribed nintedanib as monotherapy for ILD treatment, and 38.6% as first-line therapy. Approximately half of patients with PPF were prescribed nintedanib concomitantly with other glucocorticoids/immunosuppressant drugs, and after one or more glucocorticoids/immunosuppressant drugs. The most common concomitant drug in all patient groups was glucocorticoids. In patients with IPF, 18.6% of nintedanib users and 18.2% of pirfenidone users were prescribed glucocorticoids concomitantly. Concomitant glucocorticoid use was 52.7% for nintedanib users with SSc-ILD, and 44.1% for nintedanib users with PPF.

Conclusions: These results provide real-world evidence of antifibrotic use in clinical practice. Most patients with IPF were prescribed antifibrotics as monotherapy for ILD treatment whereas antifibrotics were used concomitantly with glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants in many patients with SSc-ILD and PPF. While most patients with IPF were prescribed antifibrotics as first-line therapy, patients with SSc-ILD and PPF were more likely to be prescribed nintedanib as second-line or later-line treatment after glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants.

患有纤维化间质性肺疾病的抗纤维化治疗患者的患者特征和药物治疗模式:来自索赔数据库的真实结果
背景:基于在IPF、SSc-ILD和PPF患者中进行的几项III期临床试验的结果,抗纤维化药物已在包括日本在内的许多国家被批准使用,这些临床试验显示抗纤维化治疗可减缓肺功能下降。关于抗纤维化药物在临床实践中的实际应用的信息缺乏。方法:从2013年1月1日至2023年6月30日,使用日本健康保险索赔数据库收集IPF、SSc-ILD和PPF患者的基线特征、合并症、抗纤维化药物之前和伴随用药。对所有研究变量进行描述性统计。结果:本研究纳入657例IPF患者;418例吡非尼酮IPF患者;4160名患有PPF的尼达尼布用户;18403名使用糖皮质激素/免疫抑制剂治疗PPF的ILD患者;676名患有SSc-ILD的尼达尼布使用者;698名使用糖皮质激素/免疫抑制剂治疗SSc-ILD的患者。在指数中,吡非尼酮合并IPF的患者年龄最大(平均[SD] 74.8[7.3]岁),尼达尼布合并SSc-ILD的患者年龄最小(平均[SD] 65.6[11.7]岁)。在患有IPF的尼达尼布使用者中,76.7%的人使用尼达尼布作为单药治疗,75.6%的吡非尼酮使用者使用吡非尼酮作为单药治疗。在IPF患者中,75.2%的患者使用尼达尼布作为一线治疗,76.1%的患者使用吡非尼酮。在SSc-ILD患者中,34.9%的患者将尼达尼布作为ILD的单药治疗,38.6%的患者将其作为一线治疗。大约一半的PPF患者在服用一种或多种糖皮质激素/免疫抑制剂药物后,同时服用尼达尼布和其他糖皮质激素/免疫抑制剂药物。所有患者组中最常见的合用药物是糖皮质激素。在IPF患者中,18.6%的尼达尼布使用者和18.2%的吡非尼酮使用者同时使用糖皮质激素。合并SSc-ILD的尼达尼布使用者同时使用糖皮质激素的比例为52.7%,合并PPF的尼达尼布使用者为44.1%。结论:这些结果在临床实践中提供了抗纤维化应用的真实证据。大多数IPF患者将抗纤维化药物作为ILD治疗的单一疗法,而在许多SSc-ILD和PPF患者中,抗纤维化药物与糖皮质激素/免疫抑制剂联合使用。虽然大多数IPF患者将抗纤维化药物作为一线治疗,但SSc-ILD和PPF患者更有可能将尼达尼作为糖皮质激素/免疫抑制剂后的二线或后期治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信