Machine learning prediction model with shap interpretation for chronic bronchitis risk assessment based on heavy metal exposure: a nationally representative study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Tiansheng Xia, Kaiyu Han
{"title":"Machine learning prediction model with shap interpretation for chronic bronchitis risk assessment based on heavy metal exposure: a nationally representative study.","authors":"Tiansheng Xia, Kaiyu Han","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03724-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic bronchitis (CB), as a core precursor of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), is crucial for global disease burden prevention and control. Although the association between heavy metal exposure and respiratory damage has been preliminarily demonstrated, traditional linear models are difficult to resolve the nonlinear interactions and dose-response heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to construct the first heavy metal exposure-chronic bronchitis risk prediction model by integrating exposureomics data through machine learning (ML).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Weighted logistic regression was used to assess the association of 14 blood and urine heavy metals with CB based on nationally representative samples from the 2005-2015 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The Boruta algorithm was further applied to screen the characteristic variables and construct 10 ML models. The best model was selected by four evaluation metrics: accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC), and the best model was visually interpreted using Shapley's additive interpretation (SHAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multifactorial logistic regression model showed that urinary cadmium (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.17-1.98) versus blood cadmium (OR = 1.36, 1.13-1.65) was an independent risk factor for CB. The CatBoost model had the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.805), with smoking as the most significant predictor, followed by blood cadmium concentration and gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this research, the first risk prediction diagnostic model for heavy metal-chronic bronchitis was developed, in which CatBoost model had the best performance, and it provides a referenceable prediction model for the screening of high-risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03724-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic bronchitis (CB), as a core precursor of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), is crucial for global disease burden prevention and control. Although the association between heavy metal exposure and respiratory damage has been preliminarily demonstrated, traditional linear models are difficult to resolve the nonlinear interactions and dose-response heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to construct the first heavy metal exposure-chronic bronchitis risk prediction model by integrating exposureomics data through machine learning (ML).

Methods: Weighted logistic regression was used to assess the association of 14 blood and urine heavy metals with CB based on nationally representative samples from the 2005-2015 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The Boruta algorithm was further applied to screen the characteristic variables and construct 10 ML models. The best model was selected by four evaluation metrics: accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC), and the best model was visually interpreted using Shapley's additive interpretation (SHAP).

Results: The multifactorial logistic regression model showed that urinary cadmium (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.17-1.98) versus blood cadmium (OR = 1.36, 1.13-1.65) was an independent risk factor for CB. The CatBoost model had the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.805), with smoking as the most significant predictor, followed by blood cadmium concentration and gender.

Conclusion: In this research, the first risk prediction diagnostic model for heavy metal-chronic bronchitis was developed, in which CatBoost model had the best performance, and it provides a referenceable prediction model for the screening of high-risk groups.

基于重金属暴露的慢性支气管炎风险评估的具有形状解释的机器学习预测模型:一项具有全国代表性的研究。
背景:慢性支气管炎(CB)作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的核心前兆,对全球疾病负担的预防和控制至关重要。虽然重金属暴露与呼吸损伤之间的关系已得到初步证实,但传统的线性模型难以解决其中的非线性相互作用和剂量-反应异质性。本研究的目的是通过机器学习(ML)整合暴露组学数据,构建首个重金属暴露-慢性支气管炎风险预测模型。方法:基于2005-2015年全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的全国代表性样本,采用加权logistic回归评估14种血液和尿液重金属与CB的相关性。进一步应用Boruta算法筛选特征变量,构建10 ML模型。通过准确度、特异性、敏感性和ROC曲线下面积(AUC) 4个评价指标选出最佳模型,并采用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)进行视觉解释。结果:多因素logistic回归模型显示,尿镉(OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.17-1.98)与血镉(OR = 1.36, 1.13-1.65)是CB的独立危险因素。CatBoost模型预测效果最佳(AUC = 0.805),其中吸烟是最显著的预测因子,其次是血镉浓度和性别。结论:本研究建立了首个重金属-慢性支气管炎风险预测诊断模型,其中CatBoost模型表现最佳,为高危人群的筛查提供了可参考的预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信