{"title":"Standardized droplet preamplification method for downstream circulating cell-free DNA analysis.","authors":"Colin Skeen, Erica D Pratt","doi":"10.1080/07366205.2025.2504287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) can be found in blood and other biofluids and is a minimally invasive biomarker for several pathological processes. As tumors become more invasive, an increasing amount of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is also shed into the peripheral circulation. Combined analysis of ccfDNA and ctDNA has demonstrated prognostic and predictive value in metastatic disease. However, localized tumors shed significantly less ccfDNA/ctDNA and accurate detection remains a technical challenge. To overcome this barrier, droplet preamplification has been used to perform robust multiplexed analysis of low-input samples. To reduce false positives, it is essential to use a high-fidelity polymerase with 3'-5' exonuclease activity. However, attempts to combine high-fidelity polymerases with commercial droplet digital chemistries have had limited success. There is also no standardized method for efficient amplicon recovery from droplets. In this work, we present a method to reliably stabilize emulsions and recover preamplified templates. We systematically compared our protocol with different destabilization methods and found an average 41% improvement in recovery efficiency. We anticipate that this standardized method will increase the consistency and reproducibility of ccfDNA/ctDNA analyses. This technique could be readily translated to other low-input or low-biomass samples, such as urine, saliva, or archived biopsy specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":8945,"journal":{"name":"BioTechniques","volume":"77 3","pages":"125-135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioTechniques","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07366205.2025.2504287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) can be found in blood and other biofluids and is a minimally invasive biomarker for several pathological processes. As tumors become more invasive, an increasing amount of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is also shed into the peripheral circulation. Combined analysis of ccfDNA and ctDNA has demonstrated prognostic and predictive value in metastatic disease. However, localized tumors shed significantly less ccfDNA/ctDNA and accurate detection remains a technical challenge. To overcome this barrier, droplet preamplification has been used to perform robust multiplexed analysis of low-input samples. To reduce false positives, it is essential to use a high-fidelity polymerase with 3'-5' exonuclease activity. However, attempts to combine high-fidelity polymerases with commercial droplet digital chemistries have had limited success. There is also no standardized method for efficient amplicon recovery from droplets. In this work, we present a method to reliably stabilize emulsions and recover preamplified templates. We systematically compared our protocol with different destabilization methods and found an average 41% improvement in recovery efficiency. We anticipate that this standardized method will increase the consistency and reproducibility of ccfDNA/ctDNA analyses. This technique could be readily translated to other low-input or low-biomass samples, such as urine, saliva, or archived biopsy specimens.
期刊介绍:
BioTechniques is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original laboratory methods, related technical and software tools, and methods-oriented review articles that are of broad interest to professional life scientists, as well as to scientists from other disciplines (e.g., chemistry, physics, computer science, plant and agricultural science and climate science) interested in life science applications for their technologies.
Since 1983, BioTechniques has been a leading peer-reviewed journal for methods-related research. The journal considers:
Reports describing innovative new methods, platforms and software, substantive modifications to existing methods, or innovative applications of existing methods, techniques & tools to new models or scientific questions
Descriptions of technical tools that facilitate the design or performance of experiments or data analysis, such as software and simple laboratory devices
Surveys of technical approaches related to broad fields of research
Reviews discussing advancements in techniques and methods related to broad fields of research
Letters to the Editor and Expert Opinions highlighting interesting observations or cautionary tales concerning experimental design, methodology or analysis.