A Multithreat Meta-Analytic Database for Understanding Insect Biodiversity Change

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Joseph Millard, Grace Skinner, Andrew J. Bladon, Rob Cooke, Charlotte L. Outhwaite, James G. Rodger, Lindsey A. Barnes, Justin E. Isip, Junghyuk Keum, Cristina Raw, Emily Wenban-Smith, Lynn V. Dicks, Cang Hui, John Iwan Jones, Ben Woodcock, Nick J. B. Isaac, Andy Purvis
{"title":"A Multithreat Meta-Analytic Database for Understanding Insect Biodiversity Change","authors":"Joseph Millard,&nbsp;Grace Skinner,&nbsp;Andrew J. Bladon,&nbsp;Rob Cooke,&nbsp;Charlotte L. Outhwaite,&nbsp;James G. Rodger,&nbsp;Lindsey A. Barnes,&nbsp;Justin E. Isip,&nbsp;Junghyuk Keum,&nbsp;Cristina Raw,&nbsp;Emily Wenban-Smith,&nbsp;Lynn V. Dicks,&nbsp;Cang Hui,&nbsp;John Iwan Jones,&nbsp;Ben Woodcock,&nbsp;Nick J. B. Isaac,&nbsp;Andy Purvis","doi":"10.1111/ddi.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Widespread declines in insect biodiversity have been attributed to a diverse set of anthropogenic drivers, but the relative importance of these drivers remains unclear. A key reason for this uncertainty is that their effects depend on many factors, such as taxonomy, geography, sampling method and the biodiversity metric considered. To better understand the relative impact of different drivers on insect biodiversity, effect sizes need to be anchored to major sources of heterogeneity and collected reproducibly through a structured and consistent protocol. This standardised approach will allow a quantitative synthesis of relative threats to insects, enabling more robust predictions of changes in insect biodiversity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Innovation</h3>\n \n <p>Here we publish a global database of effect sizes that quantify the effect of 5 anthropogenic drivers on insect abundance, species richness, biomass and fecundity within the framework of the IUCN threat classification. While we only present results for a subset of major anthropogenic drivers and insect Orders, the database structure allows the addition of new studies for all major IUCN threats and insect Orders. Our current set of effect sizes was collated from 7 meta-analyses, including 6308 effect sizes from 317 studies, focusing on threats ranked highly in an initial expert elicitation process. Data collection followed an overall meta-protocol and a set of individual protocols tailored to each meta-analysis. Our database provides a framework for the first global meta-analytic overview of the response of insects to a range of major anthropogenic drivers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Structured collation of both experimental and quasi-experimental effect sizes, together with metadata that capture the main sources of heterogeneity, is needed to understand the effect of anthropogenic activity on insects. In turn, this understanding opens the way to predicting how we might expect insect biodiversity to have changed in the past and into the future.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Widespread declines in insect biodiversity have been attributed to a diverse set of anthropogenic drivers, but the relative importance of these drivers remains unclear. A key reason for this uncertainty is that their effects depend on many factors, such as taxonomy, geography, sampling method and the biodiversity metric considered. To better understand the relative impact of different drivers on insect biodiversity, effect sizes need to be anchored to major sources of heterogeneity and collected reproducibly through a structured and consistent protocol. This standardised approach will allow a quantitative synthesis of relative threats to insects, enabling more robust predictions of changes in insect biodiversity.

Innovation

Here we publish a global database of effect sizes that quantify the effect of 5 anthropogenic drivers on insect abundance, species richness, biomass and fecundity within the framework of the IUCN threat classification. While we only present results for a subset of major anthropogenic drivers and insect Orders, the database structure allows the addition of new studies for all major IUCN threats and insect Orders. Our current set of effect sizes was collated from 7 meta-analyses, including 6308 effect sizes from 317 studies, focusing on threats ranked highly in an initial expert elicitation process. Data collection followed an overall meta-protocol and a set of individual protocols tailored to each meta-analysis. Our database provides a framework for the first global meta-analytic overview of the response of insects to a range of major anthropogenic drivers.

Main Conclusions

Structured collation of both experimental and quasi-experimental effect sizes, together with metadata that capture the main sources of heterogeneity, is needed to understand the effect of anthropogenic activity on insects. In turn, this understanding opens the way to predicting how we might expect insect biodiversity to have changed in the past and into the future.

Abstract Image

了解昆虫生物多样性变化的多威胁元分析数据库
昆虫生物多样性的广泛下降可归因于一系列不同的人为驱动因素,但这些驱动因素的相对重要性尚不清楚。造成这种不确定性的一个关键原因是它们的影响取决于许多因素,如分类学、地理、采样方法和所考虑的生物多样性度量。为了更好地了解不同驱动因素对昆虫生物多样性的相对影响,需要将效应大小固定在异质性的主要来源上,并通过结构化和一致的协议可重复地收集。这种标准化的方法将允许对昆虫的相对威胁进行定量综合,从而能够对昆虫生物多样性的变化进行更可靠的预测。在IUCN威胁分类框架下,我们发布了一个全球效应大小数据库,量化了5种人为驱动因素对昆虫丰度、物种丰富度、生物量和繁殖力的影响。虽然我们只提供了主要人为驱动因素和昆虫目的一个子集的结果,但数据库结构允许添加所有主要IUCN威胁和昆虫目的新研究。我们目前的效应量集合来自7项荟萃分析,包括来自317项研究的6308项效应量,重点关注在初始专家启发过程中排名较高的威胁。数据收集遵循总体元协议和针对每个元分析量身定制的一套单独协议。我们的数据库为昆虫对一系列主要人为驱动因素的响应的第一个全球元分析概述提供了一个框架。要了解人为活动对昆虫的影响,需要对实验和准实验效应大小进行结构化整理,并结合捕获异质性主要来源的元数据。反过来,这种理解为我们预测昆虫生物多样性在过去和未来的变化开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diversity and Distributions
Diversity and Distributions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
195
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信