Prognosis and Chemotherapeutic Efficacy in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Lung Metastases

IF 1.5 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Cancer reports Pub Date : 2025-05-24 DOI:10.1002/cnr2.70236
Chao Zhang, Shun Tu, Yanting Liao, Yaqiang Shu, Muyu Fu, Jiayue Li, Xiaohua Lei
{"title":"Prognosis and Chemotherapeutic Efficacy in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Lung Metastases","authors":"Chao Zhang,&nbsp;Shun Tu,&nbsp;Yanting Liao,&nbsp;Yaqiang Shu,&nbsp;Muyu Fu,&nbsp;Jiayue Li,&nbsp;Xiaohua Lei","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.70236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Studies on lung metastases from extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) are rare. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing the influencing factors, prognosis, and chemotherapeutic efficacy of ECC lung metastases, and to provide insights for optimizing medical care for patients with ECC lung metastases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrieved data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database for patients with metastatic ECC (stage M1) from 2018 to 2021. The study analyzed these characteristics using descriptive statistics. To calculate Hazard Ratios (HR), multivariate COX regression analyses were performed. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the survival of patients between groups was compared using the log-rank test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 762 people participated in the study, 50.4% of whom were men. At the time of diagnosis, 17.8% of patients had pulmonary metastases. 52.5% received chemotherapy. Multivariate COX analysis identified lung metastases as a significant risk factor for death from metastatic ECC (HR 1.64, CI 1.32–2.03, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Treatment with chemotherapy (HR 0.20, CI 0.17–0.25, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and female sex (HR 0.80, CI 0.67–0.94, <i>p</i> = 0.008) were associated with a better prognosis. Therefore, we further compared the prognosis and chemotherapy outcomes of male and female patients with ECC lung metastases. The median survival of male patients with and without lung metastases was 2 and 5 months, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.016), whereas there was no significant difference in female patients (<i>p</i> = 0.19). Regardless of gender, patients with lung metastases had significantly worse OS even after receiving chemotherapy (<i>p</i> = 0.0065 in the male group and <i>p</i> = 0.0075 in the female group). Regardless of gender, patients with lung metastases who did not receive chemotherapy had significantly shorter overall survival than those who received chemotherapy. Not receiving chemotherapy vs. receiving chemotherapy (male: 1 month vs. 5 months, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001; female: 2 months vs. 9 months, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Pulmonary metastasis is an important prognostic factor in ECC and is associated with poorer survival, especially in male patients. Therefore, preventive measures and effective control of lung metastases (e.g., chemotherapy), especially in male patients, may improve survival in patients with ECC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnr2.70236","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Studies on lung metastases from extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) are rare. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing the influencing factors, prognosis, and chemotherapeutic efficacy of ECC lung metastases, and to provide insights for optimizing medical care for patients with ECC lung metastases.

Methods

We retrieved data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database for patients with metastatic ECC (stage M1) from 2018 to 2021. The study analyzed these characteristics using descriptive statistics. To calculate Hazard Ratios (HR), multivariate COX regression analyses were performed. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the survival of patients between groups was compared using the log-rank test.

Results

A total of 762 people participated in the study, 50.4% of whom were men. At the time of diagnosis, 17.8% of patients had pulmonary metastases. 52.5% received chemotherapy. Multivariate COX analysis identified lung metastases as a significant risk factor for death from metastatic ECC (HR 1.64, CI 1.32–2.03, p < 0.001). Treatment with chemotherapy (HR 0.20, CI 0.17–0.25, p < 0.001) and female sex (HR 0.80, CI 0.67–0.94, p = 0.008) were associated with a better prognosis. Therefore, we further compared the prognosis and chemotherapy outcomes of male and female patients with ECC lung metastases. The median survival of male patients with and without lung metastases was 2 and 5 months, respectively (p = 0.016), whereas there was no significant difference in female patients (p = 0.19). Regardless of gender, patients with lung metastases had significantly worse OS even after receiving chemotherapy (p = 0.0065 in the male group and p = 0.0075 in the female group). Regardless of gender, patients with lung metastases who did not receive chemotherapy had significantly shorter overall survival than those who received chemotherapy. Not receiving chemotherapy vs. receiving chemotherapy (male: 1 month vs. 5 months, p < 0.0001; female: 2 months vs. 9 months, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Pulmonary metastasis is an important prognostic factor in ECC and is associated with poorer survival, especially in male patients. Therefore, preventive measures and effective control of lung metastases (e.g., chemotherapy), especially in male patients, may improve survival in patients with ECC.

肝外胆管癌合并肺转移的预后及化疗疗效分析
目的肝外胆管癌(ECC)肺转移的研究很少。本研究旨在通过分析ECC肺转移的影响因素、预后及化疗疗效来填补这一空白,为优化ECC肺转移患者的医疗护理提供参考。方法从2018年至2021年转移性ECC (M1期)患者的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中检索数据。本研究使用描述性统计分析了这些特征。为了计算风险比(HR),进行了多变量COX回归分析。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计总生存期(OS),采用log-rank检验比较组间患者生存期。结果共有762人参与研究,其中50.4%为男性。在诊断时,17.8%的患者有肺转移。52.5%接受了化疗。多因素COX分析发现,肺转移是转移性ECC死亡的重要危险因素(HR 1.64, CI 1.32-2.03, p < 0.001)。化疗(HR 0.20, CI 0.17-0.25, p < 0.001)和女性(HR 0.80, CI 0.67-0.94, p = 0.008)与预后较好相关。因此,我们进一步比较了男性和女性ECC肺转移患者的预后和化疗结果。男性和非肺转移患者的中位生存期分别为2个月和5个月(p = 0.016),而女性患者的中位生存期无统计学差异(p = 0.19)。无论性别如何,肺转移患者在接受化疗后的OS均明显恶化(男性组p = 0.0065,女性组p = 0.0075)。无论性别如何,未接受化疗的肺转移患者的总生存期明显短于接受化疗的患者。未接受化疗vs接受化疗(男性:1个月vs 5个月,p < 0.0001;女性:2个月vs. 9个月,p < 0.0001)。结论肺转移是ECC的重要预后因素,且与较差的生存率相关,尤其是男性患者。因此,预防措施和有效控制肺转移(如化疗),特别是男性患者,可能会提高ECC患者的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer reports
Cancer reports Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信