Evaluating routine agronomic soil tests for coastal soil salinity detection in the mid-Atlantic

Sapana Pokhrel, Willow Blew, Jarrod O. Miller, Amy L. Shober
{"title":"Evaluating routine agronomic soil tests for coastal soil salinity detection in the mid-Atlantic","authors":"Sapana Pokhrel,&nbsp;Willow Blew,&nbsp;Jarrod O. Miller,&nbsp;Amy L. Shober","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Coastal salinity is a growing concern for managing agricultural soils in the eastern United States, including the Delmarva Peninsula. The saturated paste (SP) extraction, which is the standard method for measuring soil salinity in arid climates, is not widely available in the eastern United States and its effectiveness in humid coastal soils is unknown. We evaluated the Mehlich-3 (M3) routine agronomic soil test as an alternative to SP and ammonium acetate (AA) extractions on samples from 13 Delmarva agricultural fields with known salinity issues. Soils were analyzed for electrical conductivity (EC) by SP extract (EC<sub>e</sub>) or deionized water (1:2 and 1:5 soil-to-water ratios; EC<sub>1:2</sub> and EC<sub>1:5</sub>). Extractable cations (Na, Ca, Mg, and K by SP, M3, and AA) were used to calculate exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), sodium cation ratio (SCR), and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). We noted significant positive relationships between SP-extractable Na and both M3-extractable and AA-extractable Na (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.81 and 0.77, respectively). Soil SCR values calculated from M3 and AA exhibited significant linear relationships (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.82–0.88) with ESP<sub>SAR</sub> and SAR. Strong positive linear relationships were also noted between M3-extractable Na and EC<sub>e</sub> (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.81). Reclassification of salinity using predicted EC<sub>e</sub> from M3-Na and SCR<sub>M3</sub> were similar to standard classification methods. We suggest M3 as a cost-effective and accessible option for salinity assessment in coastal soils of the Eastern United States. Further field studies linking soil salinity to crop health and yields are needed to validate soil salinity interpretations prior to widespread adoption of M3-based salinity assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal salinity is a growing concern for managing agricultural soils in the eastern United States, including the Delmarva Peninsula. The saturated paste (SP) extraction, which is the standard method for measuring soil salinity in arid climates, is not widely available in the eastern United States and its effectiveness in humid coastal soils is unknown. We evaluated the Mehlich-3 (M3) routine agronomic soil test as an alternative to SP and ammonium acetate (AA) extractions on samples from 13 Delmarva agricultural fields with known salinity issues. Soils were analyzed for electrical conductivity (EC) by SP extract (ECe) or deionized water (1:2 and 1:5 soil-to-water ratios; EC1:2 and EC1:5). Extractable cations (Na, Ca, Mg, and K by SP, M3, and AA) were used to calculate exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), sodium cation ratio (SCR), and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). We noted significant positive relationships between SP-extractable Na and both M3-extractable and AA-extractable Na (r2 = 0.81 and 0.77, respectively). Soil SCR values calculated from M3 and AA exhibited significant linear relationships (r2 = 0.82–0.88) with ESPSAR and SAR. Strong positive linear relationships were also noted between M3-extractable Na and ECe (r2 = 0.81). Reclassification of salinity using predicted ECe from M3-Na and SCRM3 were similar to standard classification methods. We suggest M3 as a cost-effective and accessible option for salinity assessment in coastal soils of the Eastern United States. Further field studies linking soil salinity to crop health and yields are needed to validate soil salinity interpretations prior to widespread adoption of M3-based salinity assessments.

评估大西洋中部沿海土壤盐度检测的常规农艺土壤试验
在包括德尔马瓦半岛在内的美国东部,沿海盐碱化日益成为农业土壤管理的一个问题。饱和膏体(SP)萃取是在干旱气候条件下测量土壤盐度的标准方法,但在美国东部尚未广泛使用,其在潮湿沿海土壤中的有效性尚不清楚。我们评估了Mehlich-3 (M3)常规农艺土壤试验作为SP和乙酸铵(AA)提取的替代方法,这些样品来自13个已知盐问题的Delmarva农田。采用SP提取物(ECe)或去离子水(1:2和1:5土水比)分析土壤电导率(EC);EC1:2和EC1:5)。采用SP、M3和AA萃取阳离子(Na、Ca、Mg和K)计算交换钠百分比(ESP)、钠阳离子比(SCR)和钠吸附比(SAR)。我们注意到sp -可提取Na与m3 -可提取Na和aa -可提取Na之间存在显著正相关(r2分别= 0.81和0.77)。M3和AA计算的土壤SCR值与ESPSAR和SAR呈显著的线性关系(r2 = 0.82 ~ 0.88), M3可提取Na与ECe呈显著的正线性关系(r2 = 0.81)。利用M3-Na和SCRM3预测ECe对盐度进行重新分类与标准分类方法相似。我们建议M3作为美国东部沿海土壤盐度评估的成本效益和可获得的选择。在广泛采用基于m3的盐度评估之前,需要进一步进行将土壤盐度与作物健康和产量联系起来的实地研究,以验证土壤盐度解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信