{"title":"Sustainable strategies for the valorization of cotton and cotton blended waste: pathways to circular economy","authors":"Tarun Grover, Lijing Wang, Rajkishore Nayak, Rajiv Padhye, Asimananda Khandual","doi":"10.1007/s10570-025-06524-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research explores the comparative efficacy of mechanical, chemical, and biological recycling methods for cotton and cotton-based blends, focusing on their processes, challenges, and implications for sustainability. Through detailed analyses of extant literature, this study identified mechanical recycling as a widely implemented method due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness but notes its limitations, such as fiber degradation, inappropriate for some fibers, and contamination from mixed materials. Chemical recycling is an effective method for recovering fibers that are unsuitable for mechanical recycling, offering high recovery rates and preventing waste being landfilled. Despite its potential, this approach faces challenges such as high energy requirements, financial constraints, and reliance on harsh chemicals. In contrast, biological recycling is emerging as an ecofriendly alternative with the potential to use enzymes for targeted degradation; however, it requires further advancements in enzyme specificity and process scalability. This review emphasizes the need for hybrid models combining these methods to address their individual limitations, such as integrating technological sorting for mechanical recycling or developing non-toxic green solvents for chemical recycling. Furthermore, Life Cycle Assessment comparisons reveal the environmental and financial benefits of optimizing these methods for industrial application, with implications for policymakers and industry stakeholders. By advancing these recycling technologies and aligning sustainable development goals, the cotton textile industry can significantly reduce waste, conserve resources, and foster sustainable practices in waste valorization.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":511,"journal":{"name":"Cellulose","volume":"32 7","pages":"4077 - 4100"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10570-025-06524-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellulose","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-025-06524-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research explores the comparative efficacy of mechanical, chemical, and biological recycling methods for cotton and cotton-based blends, focusing on their processes, challenges, and implications for sustainability. Through detailed analyses of extant literature, this study identified mechanical recycling as a widely implemented method due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness but notes its limitations, such as fiber degradation, inappropriate for some fibers, and contamination from mixed materials. Chemical recycling is an effective method for recovering fibers that are unsuitable for mechanical recycling, offering high recovery rates and preventing waste being landfilled. Despite its potential, this approach faces challenges such as high energy requirements, financial constraints, and reliance on harsh chemicals. In contrast, biological recycling is emerging as an ecofriendly alternative with the potential to use enzymes for targeted degradation; however, it requires further advancements in enzyme specificity and process scalability. This review emphasizes the need for hybrid models combining these methods to address their individual limitations, such as integrating technological sorting for mechanical recycling or developing non-toxic green solvents for chemical recycling. Furthermore, Life Cycle Assessment comparisons reveal the environmental and financial benefits of optimizing these methods for industrial application, with implications for policymakers and industry stakeholders. By advancing these recycling technologies and aligning sustainable development goals, the cotton textile industry can significantly reduce waste, conserve resources, and foster sustainable practices in waste valorization.
期刊介绍：
Cellulose is an international journal devoted to the dissemination of research and scientific and technological progress in the field of cellulose and related naturally occurring polymers. The journal is concerned with the pure and applied science of cellulose and related materials, and also with the development of relevant new technologies. This includes the chemistry, biochemistry, physics and materials science of cellulose and its sources, including wood and other biomass resources, and their derivatives. Coverage extends to the conversion of these polymers and resources into manufactured goods, such as pulp, paper, textiles, and manufactured as well natural fibers, and to the chemistry of materials used in their processing. Cellulose publishes review articles, research papers, and technical notes.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
