{"title":"Fire-induced spalling in hybrid polyethylene fiber-reinforced engineered cementitious composite panels","authors":"S. Rawat , Lihai Zhang , Y.X. Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Polyethylene (PE) fibre-reinforced engineered cementitious composites (ECC) offer high ductility and durability, however concerns over fire performance, particularly spalling resistance, continue to limit their adoption. This study evaluates single and hybrid PE fibre-reinforced ECC with high-volume slag and MgO under fire exposure, examining spalling resistance at both material and structural scales. Key test parameters include PE fibre length (9, 12, 18 mm), fibre type (single or hybrid with polypropylene (PP) and basalt fibre), and panel size (300 ×300 mm, 200 ×200 mm, 100 ×100 mm) and thickness (20, 50 mm). A novel 1-directional (1-D) spalling test is also developed and compared with a traditional 3-directional (3-D) furnace test. Material-scale tests showed that replacing 12 mm, 0.75 % PE fibre with basalt improved strength retention at elevated temperatures by approximately 5–7 %, achieving a total retention of 37–40 %. However, large-scale tests revealed poor spalling resistance with this mix as full-thickness spalling occurred in 300 × 300 × 50 mm panels. Spalling resistance improved with longer PE fibres (18 mm) or the addition of PP fibres, with a hybrid mix (12 mm 0.3 % PP, 1.25 % PE, 0.75 % basalt) demonstrating superior performance. Further analysis indicated that fibre melting may not be the primary mechanism for spalling resistance; rather, fibre distribution and bonding with the matrix are critical for forming an effective network for vapour pressure dissipation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 120589"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625009800","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Polyethylene (PE) fibre-reinforced engineered cementitious composites (ECC) offer high ductility and durability, however concerns over fire performance, particularly spalling resistance, continue to limit their adoption. This study evaluates single and hybrid PE fibre-reinforced ECC with high-volume slag and MgO under fire exposure, examining spalling resistance at both material and structural scales. Key test parameters include PE fibre length (9, 12, 18 mm), fibre type (single or hybrid with polypropylene (PP) and basalt fibre), and panel size (300 ×300 mm, 200 ×200 mm, 100 ×100 mm) and thickness (20, 50 mm). A novel 1-directional (1-D) spalling test is also developed and compared with a traditional 3-directional (3-D) furnace test. Material-scale tests showed that replacing 12 mm, 0.75 % PE fibre with basalt improved strength retention at elevated temperatures by approximately 5–7 %, achieving a total retention of 37–40 %. However, large-scale tests revealed poor spalling resistance with this mix as full-thickness spalling occurred in 300 × 300 × 50 mm panels. Spalling resistance improved with longer PE fibres (18 mm) or the addition of PP fibres, with a hybrid mix (12 mm 0.3 % PP, 1.25 % PE, 0.75 % basalt) demonstrating superior performance. Further analysis indicated that fibre melting may not be the primary mechanism for spalling resistance; rather, fibre distribution and bonding with the matrix are critical for forming an effective network for vapour pressure dissipation.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.