Advanced optimization algorithms for enhanced urban block-scale carbon accounting: A case study from Beijing, China

IF 10.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Jing Zhao , Yujie Ren , Xiaolan Tang
{"title":"Advanced optimization algorithms for enhanced urban block-scale carbon accounting: A case study from Beijing, China","authors":"Jing Zhao ,&nbsp;Yujie Ren ,&nbsp;Xiaolan Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban carbon emissions have garnered significant attention following the establishment and implementation of global carbon neutrality goals. Accurate carbon accounting in urban areas is crucial for formulating effective emission reduction strategies and assessing their effectiveness. However, the mixed-use nature of urban land presents significant challenges to precise carbon accounting. This study adopts the perspective of urban community living circles and leverages optimization algorithms and the inventory method to propose a novel carbon accounting method that addresses these challenges. Furthermore, this method's reliability was validated through an analysis of eight land parcels with varying spatial configurations in the Beijing area, along with comprehensive sensitivity analyses, while its practical applications were also explored. The findings are as follows: (1) The urban block-scale carbon accounting method optimizes population allocation across industries and incorporates land-use policies into objective function constraints, enhancing both accuracy and applicability. (2) In Beijing's functional core area, annual carbon emissions within the 5–15-min standard-scale living circles were 8.43 ktC, 24.95 ktC, and 151.95 ktC, respectively, with an emission intensity of 810.42 tC/ha in the 10–15-min zone. (3) Urban functional and residential land collectively accounted for approximately 97 % of total emissions, with urban functional land exerting a greater impact. This study presents a reliable, robust, and systematic urban block-scale carbon accounting method that integrates carbon management with land-use policies, demonstrating significant practical value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"394 ","pages":"Article 126158"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925008888","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban carbon emissions have garnered significant attention following the establishment and implementation of global carbon neutrality goals. Accurate carbon accounting in urban areas is crucial for formulating effective emission reduction strategies and assessing their effectiveness. However, the mixed-use nature of urban land presents significant challenges to precise carbon accounting. This study adopts the perspective of urban community living circles and leverages optimization algorithms and the inventory method to propose a novel carbon accounting method that addresses these challenges. Furthermore, this method's reliability was validated through an analysis of eight land parcels with varying spatial configurations in the Beijing area, along with comprehensive sensitivity analyses, while its practical applications were also explored. The findings are as follows: (1) The urban block-scale carbon accounting method optimizes population allocation across industries and incorporates land-use policies into objective function constraints, enhancing both accuracy and applicability. (2) In Beijing's functional core area, annual carbon emissions within the 5–15-min standard-scale living circles were 8.43 ktC, 24.95 ktC, and 151.95 ktC, respectively, with an emission intensity of 810.42 tC/ha in the 10–15-min zone. (3) Urban functional and residential land collectively accounted for approximately 97 % of total emissions, with urban functional land exerting a greater impact. This study presents a reliable, robust, and systematic urban block-scale carbon accounting method that integrates carbon management with land-use policies, demonstrating significant practical value.
城市块尺度碳核算的先进优化算法:以中国北京为例
随着全球碳中和目标的建立和实施,城市碳排放受到了广泛关注。准确的城市碳核算对于制定有效的减排战略和评估其有效性至关重要。然而,城市土地的混合用途性质对精确的碳核算提出了重大挑战。本研究采用城市社区生活圈视角,利用优化算法和清单法,提出了一种新的碳核算方法来解决这些挑战。通过对北京地区8个不同空间形态的地块进行分析和综合敏感性分析,验证了该方法的可靠性,并对其实际应用进行了探讨。研究结果表明:①城市块尺度碳核算方法优化了人口跨行业配置,并将土地利用政策纳入目标函数约束,提高了准确性和适用性;(2)北京市功能核心区5- 15 min标准尺度生活圈年碳排放量分别为8.43 ktC、24.95 ktC和151.95 ktC, 10 - 15 min区域碳排放强度为810.42 tC/ha。③城市功能用地和居住用地合计约占总排放量的97%,其中城市功能用地的影响更大。本研究提出了一种可靠、稳健、系统的城市块尺度碳核算方法,将碳管理与土地利用政策相结合,具有重要的实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信