Efficiently optimized multi-fillers for rain gardens: Long-term pollution control performance

IF 8.7 Q1 Environmental Science
Tianyin Huang , Zhixin Wang , Yiming Nie , Hanhan Liu , Peirong Li , Jingjing Yang , Bingdang Wu
{"title":"Efficiently optimized multi-fillers for rain gardens: Long-term pollution control performance","authors":"Tianyin Huang ,&nbsp;Zhixin Wang ,&nbsp;Yiming Nie ,&nbsp;Hanhan Liu ,&nbsp;Peirong Li ,&nbsp;Jingjing Yang ,&nbsp;Bingdang Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.watcyc.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rain gardens play a pivotal role in the infiltration and purification of runoff, with the filler layer being a critical component. However, the selection and configuration of fillers in existing rain gardens often lack scientific rigor, leading to suboptimal performance. To address this issue, this study employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to systematically evaluate 11 types of fillers, including 5 natural materials, 3 industrial wastes, and 3 artificial materials, aiming to optimize filler configurations and enhance the pollutant removal efficiency of rain gardens. The results demonstrate that steel slag, coconut shell biochar, green zeolite, and fly ash ceramic granules exhibit superior performance in purifying both simulated and actual runoff. The optimal filler combination, comprising 25% green zeolite, 25% steel slag, and 50% coconut shell biochar, achieved removal rates of 50.49%, 76.12%, 44.12%, 89.94%, 58.38%, and 88.19% for COD, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N, TP, Cu(II), Cr(VI), and tetracycline, respectively. Long-term operational evaluation (&gt;110 days) revealed that the optimized filler layer significantly improved the removal rates of COD, TN, and TP to 86.83%, 80.19%, and 88.42%, respectively. By comparing the physicochemical properties of the fillers before and after use, the mechanisms underlying runoff purification were preliminarily elucidated. Different fillers exhibited specific adsorption capabilities for distinct pollutants, and the synergistic effects of multiple fillers significantly enhanced the rain garden's capacity for source pollutant reduction. AHP was used in this study to validate the scientific validity of AHP in the device of rain gardens through filler combination adsorption experiments and long-term monitoring of rain garden installations, while concurrently offering a broader range of green solutions for the enhancement of rain gardens.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34143,"journal":{"name":"Water Cycle","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 387-398"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Cycle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666445325000170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rain gardens play a pivotal role in the infiltration and purification of runoff, with the filler layer being a critical component. However, the selection and configuration of fillers in existing rain gardens often lack scientific rigor, leading to suboptimal performance. To address this issue, this study employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to systematically evaluate 11 types of fillers, including 5 natural materials, 3 industrial wastes, and 3 artificial materials, aiming to optimize filler configurations and enhance the pollutant removal efficiency of rain gardens. The results demonstrate that steel slag, coconut shell biochar, green zeolite, and fly ash ceramic granules exhibit superior performance in purifying both simulated and actual runoff. The optimal filler combination, comprising 25% green zeolite, 25% steel slag, and 50% coconut shell biochar, achieved removal rates of 50.49%, 76.12%, 44.12%, 89.94%, 58.38%, and 88.19% for COD, NH4+-N, TP, Cu(II), Cr(VI), and tetracycline, respectively. Long-term operational evaluation (>110 days) revealed that the optimized filler layer significantly improved the removal rates of COD, TN, and TP to 86.83%, 80.19%, and 88.42%, respectively. By comparing the physicochemical properties of the fillers before and after use, the mechanisms underlying runoff purification were preliminarily elucidated. Different fillers exhibited specific adsorption capabilities for distinct pollutants, and the synergistic effects of multiple fillers significantly enhanced the rain garden's capacity for source pollutant reduction. AHP was used in this study to validate the scientific validity of AHP in the device of rain gardens through filler combination adsorption experiments and long-term monitoring of rain garden installations, while concurrently offering a broader range of green solutions for the enhancement of rain gardens.

Abstract Image

高效优化的雨水花园多填料:长期污染控制性能
雨水花园在径流的入渗和净化中起着关键作用,其中填料层是一个关键组成部分。然而,在现有的雨水花园中,填料的选择和配置往往缺乏科学的严谨性,导致性能不佳。针对这一问题,本研究采用层次分析法(AHP)对5种天然材料、3种工业废弃物、3种人工材料等11种填料进行了系统评价,旨在优化填料配置,提高雨园的污染物去除效率。结果表明,钢渣、椰壳生物炭、绿色沸石和粉煤灰陶瓷颗粒对模拟径流和实际径流均有较好的净化效果。最佳填料组合为25%绿沸石、25%钢渣、50%椰壳生物炭,对COD、NH4+-N、TP、Cu(II)、Cr(VI)和四环素的去除率分别为50.49%、76.12%、44.12%、89.94%、58.38%和88.19%。长期运行评价(>110 d)表明,优化后的填料层对COD、TN和TP的去除率分别达到86.83%、80.19%和88.42%。通过对填料使用前后理化性能的比较,初步探讨了填料净化径流的机理。不同填料对不同污染物表现出特定的吸附能力,多种填料的协同效应显著增强了雨园对源污染物的减排能力。本研究采用层次分析法,通过填料组合吸附实验和对雨园装置的长期监测,验证层次分析法在雨园装置中的科学有效性,同时为雨园的提升提供更广泛的绿色解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Cycle
Water Cycle Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
45 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信