Changes in prevalence of loneliness among home-dwelling older adults over three decades and associated factors

IF 3.9
Mia T. Knuutila , Laura J. Rautiainen , Ulla L. Aalto , Tuuli E. Lehti , Helena Karppinen , Hannu Kautiainen , Timo E. Strandberg , Hanna Reeta Öhman , Niina M. Savikko , Anu H. Jansson , Kaisu H. Pitkälä
{"title":"Changes in prevalence of loneliness among home-dwelling older adults over three decades and associated factors","authors":"Mia T. Knuutila ,&nbsp;Laura J. Rautiainen ,&nbsp;Ulla L. Aalto ,&nbsp;Tuuli E. Lehti ,&nbsp;Helena Karppinen ,&nbsp;Hannu Kautiainen ,&nbsp;Timo E. Strandberg ,&nbsp;Hanna Reeta Öhman ,&nbsp;Niina M. Savikko ,&nbsp;Anu H. Jansson ,&nbsp;Kaisu H. Pitkälä","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2025.112790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Studies examining loneliness trends over several decades among comparable cohorts of older people are rare.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We evaluated how the prevalence of self-reported loneliness has changed over three decades among home-dwelling older people (75+ years), and factors associated with loneliness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used data from four waves of the Helsinki Aging Study (1989-present), a repeated cross-sectional cohort study. The data had been collected using a postal questionnaire. The sample sizes were: 1989 (<em>n</em> = 660), 1999 (<em>n</em> = 2598), 2009 (<em>n</em> = 1637), 2019 (<em>n</em> = 1758). Based on responses to the question “Do you suffer from loneliness?”, we categorized the respondents into lonely (‘always or often’, ‘sometimes’) and not lonely (‘seldom or never’). The associations between various characteristics and loneliness were explored.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The prevalence of loneliness among older people decreased slightly between 1989 and 2019, from 34 % to 30 %. Loneliness decreased among both sexes. In the multivariable forward stepwise regression model, factors associated with loneliness were widowhood (OR 2.18, 95 % CI 1.91–2.49), needing help daily (OR 1.83, 95 % CI 1.56–2.16), feeling depressed (OR 5.26, 95 % CI 3.56–7.77), comorbidities (OR 1.07, 95 % CI 1.03–1.11), feeling useful (OR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.31–0.41), meeting friends (OR 0.65, 95 % CI 0.57–0.74), and male sex (OR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.59–0.80).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Loneliness among both older men and women has decreased over the past three decades. Several factors were found to be associated with loneliness. Given the detrimental impact of loneliness on health of individuals, policies and health strategies aimed at alleviating loneliness among older people should be a top priority.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 112790"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556525001196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Studies examining loneliness trends over several decades among comparable cohorts of older people are rare.

Objective

We evaluated how the prevalence of self-reported loneliness has changed over three decades among home-dwelling older people (75+ years), and factors associated with loneliness.

Methods

We used data from four waves of the Helsinki Aging Study (1989-present), a repeated cross-sectional cohort study. The data had been collected using a postal questionnaire. The sample sizes were: 1989 (n = 660), 1999 (n = 2598), 2009 (n = 1637), 2019 (n = 1758). Based on responses to the question “Do you suffer from loneliness?”, we categorized the respondents into lonely (‘always or often’, ‘sometimes’) and not lonely (‘seldom or never’). The associations between various characteristics and loneliness were explored.

Results

The prevalence of loneliness among older people decreased slightly between 1989 and 2019, from 34 % to 30 %. Loneliness decreased among both sexes. In the multivariable forward stepwise regression model, factors associated with loneliness were widowhood (OR 2.18, 95 % CI 1.91–2.49), needing help daily (OR 1.83, 95 % CI 1.56–2.16), feeling depressed (OR 5.26, 95 % CI 3.56–7.77), comorbidities (OR 1.07, 95 % CI 1.03–1.11), feeling useful (OR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.31–0.41), meeting friends (OR 0.65, 95 % CI 0.57–0.74), and male sex (OR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.59–0.80).

Conclusions

Loneliness among both older men and women has decreased over the past three decades. Several factors were found to be associated with loneliness. Given the detrimental impact of loneliness on health of individuals, policies and health strategies aimed at alleviating loneliness among older people should be a top priority.
三十年来居家老年人孤独感的变化及相关因素
背景:对几十年来可比较的老年人群体的孤独趋势进行调查的研究很少。目的:评估75岁以上居家老年人自我报告的孤独感在过去30年中的变化,以及与孤独感相关的因素。方法:我们使用了赫尔辛基老龄化研究(1989年至今)的四波数据,这是一项重复的横断面队列研究。数据是通过邮寄调查表收集的。样本量分别为1989年(n = 660)、1999年(n = 2598)、2009年(n = 1637)、2019年(n = 1758)。根据对“你是否感到孤独?”,我们将受访者分为孤独(“总是或经常”,“有时”)和不孤独(“很少或从不”)。探讨了各种特征与孤独感之间的联系。结果1989年至2019年期间,老年人的孤独感患病率略有下降,从34%降至30%。男女的孤独感都有所下降。在多变量正向逐步回归模型中,与孤独相关的因素为丧偶(OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.91-2.49)、每天需要帮助(OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.56-2.16)、感觉抑郁(OR 5.26, 95% CI 3.56-7.77)、合并症(OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.11)、感觉有用(OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.31-0.41)、会见朋友(OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.57-0.74)和男性(OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.80)。结论:在过去的30年里,老年男性和女性的孤独感都有所下降。有几个因素被发现与孤独有关。鉴于孤独对个人健康的有害影响,旨在减轻老年人孤独的政策和健康战略应成为最优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental gerontology
Experimental gerontology Ageing, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信