The impact of active methodologies in the classroom on academic achievement: A systematic literature review using the PRISMA protocol

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Silvia Conde-Izquierdo, Álvaro Moraleda Ruano, David Pascual Nicolás
{"title":"The impact of active methodologies in the classroom on academic achievement: A systematic literature review using the PRISMA protocol","authors":"Silvia Conde-Izquierdo,&nbsp;Álvaro Moraleda Ruano,&nbsp;David Pascual Nicolás","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of active methodologies on academic performance, assessing their potential to enhance educational success. It analyses the effects of Service-Learning, Cooperative Learning, Inquiry-Based Learning, Problem-Based Learning, Project-Based Learning, Gamification, Flipped Classroom, Discovery Learning, and Experiential Learning on academic achievement and students’ holistic development. A systematic literature review was carried out following PRISMA guidelines, identifying 774 records in Scopus, ERIC, WoS, Google Scholar, Dialnet, and Redalyc. Thirty-six articles were selected and published between 2018 and 2024, with empirical evidence in Spanish or English. The findings highlighted that the Flipped Classroom predominates in Social Sciences at the university level, whereas Cooperative Learning prevailed in Natural Sciences, particularly in Primary and Secondary education. Approaches such as Problem-Based Learning, Gamification, Cooperative Learning, Flipped Classroom, Project-Based Learning, and Inquiry-Based Learning demonstrated positive correlations with academic achievement, learner motivation, and student satisfaction, outperforming traditional methods. These methodologies promote academic outcomes and hold great potential to enrich the educational process. However, their effectiveness depends on teacher training, digital integration, and pedagogical adaptability. Further longitudinal research, rigorous experimental designs, and sustained professional development are recommended to optimise implementation and maximise impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Research","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 102644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035525001181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of active methodologies on academic performance, assessing their potential to enhance educational success. It analyses the effects of Service-Learning, Cooperative Learning, Inquiry-Based Learning, Problem-Based Learning, Project-Based Learning, Gamification, Flipped Classroom, Discovery Learning, and Experiential Learning on academic achievement and students’ holistic development. A systematic literature review was carried out following PRISMA guidelines, identifying 774 records in Scopus, ERIC, WoS, Google Scholar, Dialnet, and Redalyc. Thirty-six articles were selected and published between 2018 and 2024, with empirical evidence in Spanish or English. The findings highlighted that the Flipped Classroom predominates in Social Sciences at the university level, whereas Cooperative Learning prevailed in Natural Sciences, particularly in Primary and Secondary education. Approaches such as Problem-Based Learning, Gamification, Cooperative Learning, Flipped Classroom, Project-Based Learning, and Inquiry-Based Learning demonstrated positive correlations with academic achievement, learner motivation, and student satisfaction, outperforming traditional methods. These methodologies promote academic outcomes and hold great potential to enrich the educational process. However, their effectiveness depends on teacher training, digital integration, and pedagogical adaptability. Further longitudinal research, rigorous experimental designs, and sustained professional development are recommended to optimise implementation and maximise impact.

Abstract Image

课堂上积极方法论对学业成绩的影响:使用PRISMA协议的系统文献综述
本研究考察了积极方法对学习成绩的影响,评估了他们提高教育成功的潜力。分析了服务学习、合作学习、探究学习、问题学习、项目学习、游戏化学习、翻转课堂学习、发现学习和体验学习对学生学业成就和整体发展的影响。按照PRISMA指南进行了系统的文献综述,在Scopus、ERIC、WoS、谷歌Scholar、Dialnet和Redalyc中确定了774条记录。在2018年至2024年期间,选择并发表了36篇文章,并以西班牙语或英语提供了经验证据。研究结果强调,翻转课堂在大学社会科学中占主导地位,而合作学习在自然科学中占主导地位,特别是在中小学教育中。基于问题的学习、游戏化、合作学习、翻转课堂、基于项目的学习和基于探究的学习等方法与学习成绩、学习者动机和学生满意度呈正相关,优于传统方法。这些方法促进了学术成果,并具有丰富教育过程的巨大潜力。然而,其有效性取决于教师培训、数字化整合和教学适应性。建议进一步进行纵向研究,严格的实验设计和持续的专业发展,以优化实施和最大化影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Research
International Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Research publishes regular papers and special issues on specific topics of interest to international audiences of educational researchers. Examples of recent Special Issues published in the journal illustrate the breadth of topics that have be included in the journal: Students Perspectives on Learning Environments, Social, Motivational and Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Epistemological Beliefs and Domain, Analyzing Mathematics Classroom Cultures and Practices, and Music Education: A site for collaborative creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信