Investigation of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin-based triplet regimens on biliary tract cancer with possible lymph node metastasis

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110149
Shogo Kobayashi, Hirofumi Akita, Daisaku Yamada, Kazuki Sasaki, Shinichiro Hasegawa, Yoshito Tomimaru, Takehiro Noda, Hidenori Takahashi, Yuichiro Doki, Hidetoshi Eguchi
{"title":"Investigation of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin-based triplet regimens on biliary tract cancer with possible lymph node metastasis","authors":"Shogo Kobayashi,&nbsp;Hirofumi Akita,&nbsp;Daisaku Yamada,&nbsp;Kazuki Sasaki,&nbsp;Shinichiro Hasegawa,&nbsp;Yoshito Tomimaru,&nbsp;Takehiro Noda,&nbsp;Hidenori Takahashi,&nbsp;Yuichiro Doki,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Eguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is rare. The treatment outcomes in patients with lymph node (LN) metastasis diagnosed by FDG-PET or a biopsy—who are considered to be ‘biologically borderline resectable’—are poor. However, perioperative treatment is still under development. Recently, gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC)-based triplet regimens for unresectable BTC have been developed. We applied GC-based triplet therapy in BTC with LN metastasis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We administered GC plus S-1 therapy (GCS) or nab-paclitaxel therapy (GCnP) to 30 patients with LN metastasis diagnosed by FDG-PET or a biopsy (GC-based triplet group). A dataset of BTC with FDG-positive LNs, previously used for an analysis of the diagnosis and treatment outcomes according to FDG uptake, was used as a control (upfront surgery group, n = 19).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>GCS and GCnP were used by 22 and 8 patients, respectively. The median treatment period was 79 days, the objective response rate was 47 %, the tumor control rate was 87 %, and 22 patients underwent R0 resection (73 %). The groups showed no significant differences with the exception of the FDG uptake by the main tumor. The three-year overall survival (OS) rates in the GC-based triplet and upfront surgery groups were 45.4 % and 15.8 %, respectively (P = 0.0052); there were no significant differences in progression-free or recurrence-free survival. A sub-analysis showed that normalized CA19-9 levels provided better survival than non-normalized CA19-9 levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Neoadjuvant GC-based triplet regimens could provide survival benefits in BTC with LN metastasis diagnosed by FGD-PET or a biopsy. CA19-9 normalization may be useful for indicating surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 9","pages":"Article 110149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325005773","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is rare. The treatment outcomes in patients with lymph node (LN) metastasis diagnosed by FDG-PET or a biopsy—who are considered to be ‘biologically borderline resectable’—are poor. However, perioperative treatment is still under development. Recently, gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC)-based triplet regimens for unresectable BTC have been developed. We applied GC-based triplet therapy in BTC with LN metastasis.

Methods

We administered GC plus S-1 therapy (GCS) or nab-paclitaxel therapy (GCnP) to 30 patients with LN metastasis diagnosed by FDG-PET or a biopsy (GC-based triplet group). A dataset of BTC with FDG-positive LNs, previously used for an analysis of the diagnosis and treatment outcomes according to FDG uptake, was used as a control (upfront surgery group, n = 19).

Results

GCS and GCnP were used by 22 and 8 patients, respectively. The median treatment period was 79 days, the objective response rate was 47 %, the tumor control rate was 87 %, and 22 patients underwent R0 resection (73 %). The groups showed no significant differences with the exception of the FDG uptake by the main tumor. The three-year overall survival (OS) rates in the GC-based triplet and upfront surgery groups were 45.4 % and 15.8 %, respectively (P = 0.0052); there were no significant differences in progression-free or recurrence-free survival. A sub-analysis showed that normalized CA19-9 levels provided better survival than non-normalized CA19-9 levels.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant GC-based triplet regimens could provide survival benefits in BTC with LN metastasis diagnosed by FGD-PET or a biopsy. CA19-9 normalization may be useful for indicating surgery.
新辅助吉西他滨加顺铂三联治疗胆道癌伴淋巴结转移的研究
胆道癌(BTC)是罕见的。通过FDG-PET或活检诊断的淋巴结转移患者(被认为是“生物学上可切除的”)的治疗结果很差。然而,围手术期治疗仍在发展中。最近,吉西他滨+顺铂(GC)为基础的三联方案已经开发用于不可切除的BTC。我们采用以gc为基础的三联疗法治疗伴有淋巴结转移的BTC。方法对30例经FDG-PET或活检诊断为LN转移的患者(以GC为基础的三联组)进行GC + S-1治疗(GCS)或nab-紫杉醇治疗(GCnP)。使用FDG阳性LNs的BTC数据集作为对照(前期手术组,n = 19),该数据集先前用于根据FDG摄取分析诊断和治疗结果。结果22例患者使用gcs, 8例患者使用GCnP。治疗中位期79天,客观有效率47%,肿瘤控制率87%,22例患者行R0切除术(73%)。除了主要肿瘤对FDG的摄取外,各组间无显著差异。基于gc的三联组和前期手术组的3年总生存率分别为45.4%和15.8% (P = 0.0052);无进展生存期和无复发生存期无显著差异。亚分析显示,规范化CA19-9水平比非规范化CA19-9水平提供更好的生存率。结论基于gc的新辅助三重方案可提高FGD-PET或活检诊断为淋巴结转移的BTC患者的生存率。CA19-9正常化可能对指示手术有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信