A SWOT analysis of stakeholder perspectives on the strategic application of economic sustainability indicators in Ghana’s road infrastructure development
George Okyere Dokyi , Kwame Kwakwa Osei , John Tookey , Funmilayo Ebun Rotimi
{"title":"A SWOT analysis of stakeholder perspectives on the strategic application of economic sustainability indicators in Ghana’s road infrastructure development","authors":"George Okyere Dokyi , Kwame Kwakwa Osei , John Tookey , Funmilayo Ebun Rotimi","doi":"10.1080/15568318.2025.2496894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the economic criterion indicators for sustainable road and highway infrastructure development in Ghana through a phenomenological research approach. Using SWOT analysis and semi-structured interviews with 14 key stakeholders, including government officials, academics, and private sector professionals, the research examines four critical economic indicators: material costs, lifecycle costs, construction time, and maintenance and operation costs Through content analysis using ATLAS.ti 9 software, the study evaluates internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats affecting each indicator’s implementation. The findings reveal multifaceted challenges including insufficient expertise in lifecycle cost analysis, inadequate maintenance funding, weak regulatory enforcement, and political interference. The study identifies strategic action plans for each indicator, including local material sourcing, improved procurement practices, capacity building initiatives, enhanced stakeholder collaboration, and technological integration. These recommendations are supported by specific deliverables and expert remarks that provide practical implementation guidance. This research contributes to sustainable infrastructure development theory and practice by providing a comprehensive framework for economic sustainability in Ghana’s road and highway sector. While the study’s geographical focus may limit generalisability, it offers valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners in developing countries facing similar challenges. The findings suggest that the successful implementation of economic sustainability indicators requires a coordinated approach combining technical expertise, policy reform, and stakeholder engagement, while considering local contextual factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47824,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","volume":"19 5","pages":"Pages 375-392"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1556831825000188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores the economic criterion indicators for sustainable road and highway infrastructure development in Ghana through a phenomenological research approach. Using SWOT analysis and semi-structured interviews with 14 key stakeholders, including government officials, academics, and private sector professionals, the research examines four critical economic indicators: material costs, lifecycle costs, construction time, and maintenance and operation costs Through content analysis using ATLAS.ti 9 software, the study evaluates internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats affecting each indicator’s implementation. The findings reveal multifaceted challenges including insufficient expertise in lifecycle cost analysis, inadequate maintenance funding, weak regulatory enforcement, and political interference. The study identifies strategic action plans for each indicator, including local material sourcing, improved procurement practices, capacity building initiatives, enhanced stakeholder collaboration, and technological integration. These recommendations are supported by specific deliverables and expert remarks that provide practical implementation guidance. This research contributes to sustainable infrastructure development theory and practice by providing a comprehensive framework for economic sustainability in Ghana’s road and highway sector. While the study’s geographical focus may limit generalisability, it offers valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners in developing countries facing similar challenges. The findings suggest that the successful implementation of economic sustainability indicators requires a coordinated approach combining technical expertise, policy reform, and stakeholder engagement, while considering local contextual factors.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Sustainable Transportation provides a discussion forum for the exchange of new and innovative ideas on sustainable transportation research in the context of environmental, economical, social, and engineering aspects, as well as current and future interactions of transportation systems and other urban subsystems. The scope includes the examination of overall sustainability of any transportation system, including its infrastructure, vehicle, operation, and maintenance; the integration of social science disciplines, engineering, and information technology with transportation; the understanding of the comparative aspects of different transportation systems from a global perspective; qualitative and quantitative transportation studies; and case studies, surveys, and expository papers in an international or local context. Equal emphasis is placed on the problems of sustainable transportation that are associated with passenger and freight transportation modes in both industrialized and non-industrialized areas. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert reviewers. All peer review is single-blind. Submissions are made online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.