Exploring preterm birth and low birth weight as environmental sensitivity factors: A scoping review of socio-emotional and cognitive developmental outcomes

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
F. Lionetti , A. Sperati , M. Spinelli , A. Dellagiulia , M. Fasolo , M. Pluess
{"title":"Exploring preterm birth and low birth weight as environmental sensitivity factors: A scoping review of socio-emotional and cognitive developmental outcomes","authors":"F. Lionetti ,&nbsp;A. Sperati ,&nbsp;M. Spinelli ,&nbsp;A. Dellagiulia ,&nbsp;M. Fasolo ,&nbsp;M. Pluess","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Perinatal adversities, such as preterm birth and low birth weight, have traditionally been viewed as vulnerability factors. However, emerging evidence suggests that these conditions may also increase sensitivity to environmental exposures in a for-better-and-for-worse manner, consistent with the concept of Environmental Sensitivity (ES) and Differential Susceptibility theory. This scoping review examines whether preterm birth and low birth weight function as ES factors for socio-emotional and cognitive outcomes. We reviewed 134 studies published up to June 2024, identifying 20 that explored the interplay between birth condition and postnatal environmental variables. Evidence was mixed across Differential Susceptibility, Vantage Sensitivity, and Dual-risk models. Differential Susceptibility was more frequently observed in studies using observational methods and assessing the environment and outcomes early in life, while Dual-risk effects were often reported in studies relying on parent-report. Only a few studies identified Vantage Sensitivity, and these were primarily in samples of moderately preterm children. Future research leveraging secondary datasets and incorporating broader parental and infant variables—such as prenatal stress and infant temperament—could clarify the conditions under which perinatal adversities predict heightened environmental sensitivity. Such insights may inform tailored interventions aimed at supporting families facing preterm birth and low birth weight, promoting both recovery and flourishing developmental outcomes</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 106216"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425002167","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perinatal adversities, such as preterm birth and low birth weight, have traditionally been viewed as vulnerability factors. However, emerging evidence suggests that these conditions may also increase sensitivity to environmental exposures in a for-better-and-for-worse manner, consistent with the concept of Environmental Sensitivity (ES) and Differential Susceptibility theory. This scoping review examines whether preterm birth and low birth weight function as ES factors for socio-emotional and cognitive outcomes. We reviewed 134 studies published up to June 2024, identifying 20 that explored the interplay between birth condition and postnatal environmental variables. Evidence was mixed across Differential Susceptibility, Vantage Sensitivity, and Dual-risk models. Differential Susceptibility was more frequently observed in studies using observational methods and assessing the environment and outcomes early in life, while Dual-risk effects were often reported in studies relying on parent-report. Only a few studies identified Vantage Sensitivity, and these were primarily in samples of moderately preterm children. Future research leveraging secondary datasets and incorporating broader parental and infant variables—such as prenatal stress and infant temperament—could clarify the conditions under which perinatal adversities predict heightened environmental sensitivity. Such insights may inform tailored interventions aimed at supporting families facing preterm birth and low birth weight, promoting both recovery and flourishing developmental outcomes
探索早产和低出生体重作为环境敏感性因素:社会情绪和认知发展结果的范围审查
围产期逆境,如早产和低出生体重,传统上被视为易感因素。然而,新出现的证据表明,这些条件也可能以一种或好或坏的方式增加对环境暴露的敏感性,这与环境敏感性(ES)和差异敏感性理论的概念一致。本综述探讨了早产和低出生体重是否作为社会情绪和认知结果的ES因素。我们回顾了截至2024年6月发表的134项研究,确定了20项探索出生条件与出生后环境变量之间相互作用的研究。差异易感性、有利敏感性和双风险模型的证据是混合的。在使用观察方法和评估生活早期环境和结果的研究中,更经常观察到差异易感性,而在依赖父母报告的研究中,双风险效应经常被报道。只有少数研究确定了有利敏感性,这些主要是在中度早产儿童的样本中。未来的研究利用二级数据集,并纳入更广泛的父母和婴儿变量,如产前压力和婴儿脾气,可以澄清围产期逆境预测环境敏感性提高的条件。这些见解可以为有针对性的干预措施提供信息,旨在支持面临早产和低出生体重的家庭,促进康复和蓬勃发展
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信