{"title":"A complex dynamic systems perspective on the roles of culture, context, and identity in psychoeducational interventions","authors":"Avi Kaplan , Joanna K. Garner , Stephen Whitney","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we apply a Complex Dynamic Systems (CDS) perspective to reconsider current causal assumptions about educational contexts and the roles of culture, context, and identity in psychoeducational interventions. Focusing on phenomena such as teachers' and students' engagement, motivation, development, and wellbeing, we emphasize the phenomenon's <em>conceptual</em> unit-of-analysis for interventions as “the agent(s) in their authentic lived environment.” Different from assumptions about causality in prevalent approaches to designing and evaluating interventions (e.g., RCT) as cross-contextual, independent, and mostly linear, a CDS perspective affords accounting for contextual and treatment-related heterogeneity and dynamism by viewing causal processes as emergent, non-deterministic, and changing due to factors' <em>inter-</em>dependence, shifting stability, and contextual embeddedness. We describe a CDS model of culturally and contextually based identity, motivation, and action—the Dynamic Systems Model of Role Identity (DSMRI)—to illustrate the application of CDS to psychoeducational interventions. We exemplify this perspective's implications for designing and evaluating psychoeducational interventions as design-based case studies that ground analyses at the unit-of-analysis of the “agent(s)-in-context.”</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 101470"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440525000433","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we apply a Complex Dynamic Systems (CDS) perspective to reconsider current causal assumptions about educational contexts and the roles of culture, context, and identity in psychoeducational interventions. Focusing on phenomena such as teachers' and students' engagement, motivation, development, and wellbeing, we emphasize the phenomenon's conceptual unit-of-analysis for interventions as “the agent(s) in their authentic lived environment.” Different from assumptions about causality in prevalent approaches to designing and evaluating interventions (e.g., RCT) as cross-contextual, independent, and mostly linear, a CDS perspective affords accounting for contextual and treatment-related heterogeneity and dynamism by viewing causal processes as emergent, non-deterministic, and changing due to factors' inter-dependence, shifting stability, and contextual embeddedness. We describe a CDS model of culturally and contextually based identity, motivation, and action—the Dynamic Systems Model of Role Identity (DSMRI)—to illustrate the application of CDS to psychoeducational interventions. We exemplify this perspective's implications for designing and evaluating psychoeducational interventions as design-based case studies that ground analyses at the unit-of-analysis of the “agent(s)-in-context.”
期刊介绍:
The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.