Who cleans up the mess? Exploring community-based solutions for rehabilitating Ghana's artisanal and small-scale mining lands

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ferdinand Adu-Baffour , Thomas Daum , Elizabeth Asantewaa Obeng , Christine Bosch , Regina Birner
{"title":"Who cleans up the mess? Exploring community-based solutions for rehabilitating Ghana's artisanal and small-scale mining lands","authors":"Ferdinand Adu-Baffour ,&nbsp;Thomas Daum ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Asantewaa Obeng ,&nbsp;Christine Bosch ,&nbsp;Regina Birner","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the absence of effective state mechanisms to enforce more sustainable mining and post-mining practices, the question arises whether community-based solutions could be a “second-best” strategy to restore lands that have been degraded and abandoned after small-scale mining in developing countries, which is also referred to as Artisanal and Small-scale Mining (ASM). This paper applies social capital theory and political ecology to address this question. On this basis, we used qualitative methods, including the Net-Map tool, to analyze a unique case of an NGO-initiated, community-based ASM land restoration project in Ghana. The objective was to examine the conditions under which communities are willing to ensure sustainable land rehabilitation outcomes. The findings reveal that there is community support for reclaiming and remediating former ASM lands using communal labor. However, this support depends on land tenure and benefit sharing arrangements. Traditional authorities were perceived as among the most influential actors to ensure a positive outcome, as they have the power to enact and enforce local laws, norms, rules and practices, and sanction noncompliance with regards to customary land management. In contrast, local community members and landowners, on the other hand, were seen as being largely unorganized, having different land use priorities and lacking secure land tenure. To encourage community-based rehabilitation of land degraded by ASM, policy interventions need to facilitate clear land tenure agreements and equitable distribution of post-restoration benefits. Overall, this study shows that community-based solutions has the potential to be a second-best option for mined-land rehabilitation. These efforts need to pay close attention to social networks, power relations, norms, rules, and practices to ensure their success and to ensure that community members truly benefit from restoration outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101239"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the absence of effective state mechanisms to enforce more sustainable mining and post-mining practices, the question arises whether community-based solutions could be a “second-best” strategy to restore lands that have been degraded and abandoned after small-scale mining in developing countries, which is also referred to as Artisanal and Small-scale Mining (ASM). This paper applies social capital theory and political ecology to address this question. On this basis, we used qualitative methods, including the Net-Map tool, to analyze a unique case of an NGO-initiated, community-based ASM land restoration project in Ghana. The objective was to examine the conditions under which communities are willing to ensure sustainable land rehabilitation outcomes. The findings reveal that there is community support for reclaiming and remediating former ASM lands using communal labor. However, this support depends on land tenure and benefit sharing arrangements. Traditional authorities were perceived as among the most influential actors to ensure a positive outcome, as they have the power to enact and enforce local laws, norms, rules and practices, and sanction noncompliance with regards to customary land management. In contrast, local community members and landowners, on the other hand, were seen as being largely unorganized, having different land use priorities and lacking secure land tenure. To encourage community-based rehabilitation of land degraded by ASM, policy interventions need to facilitate clear land tenure agreements and equitable distribution of post-restoration benefits. Overall, this study shows that community-based solutions has the potential to be a second-best option for mined-land rehabilitation. These efforts need to pay close attention to social networks, power relations, norms, rules, and practices to ensure their success and to ensure that community members truly benefit from restoration outcomes.
谁来收拾残局?探索以社区为基础的解决方案,恢复加纳的手工和小规模采矿用地
在缺乏有效的国家机制来执行更可持续的采矿和采矿后实践的情况下,出现了一个问题,即以社区为基础的解决方案是否可能成为恢复发展中国家小规模采矿(也称为手工和小规模采矿)后退化和废弃土地的“次优”战略。本文运用社会资本理论和政治生态学来解决这一问题。在此基础上,我们使用定性方法,包括Net-Map工具,分析了加纳非政府组织发起的基于社区的ASM土地恢复项目的独特案例。目的是审查社区在何种条件下愿意确保可持续的土地恢复成果。调查结果显示,社区支持利用公共劳动力开垦和修复前ASM土地。但是,这种支助取决于土地保有和利益分享安排。人们认为,传统当局是确保取得积极成果的最具影响力的行动者之一,因为它们有权颁布和执行地方法律、规范、规则和做法,并有权制裁不遵守习惯土地管理的行为。相反,另一方面,当地社区成员和土地所有者被认为基本上没有组织,有不同的土地使用优先次序,缺乏可靠的土地保有权。为了鼓励以社区为基础的因农业退化的土地的恢复,政策干预需要促进明确的土地所有权协议和恢复后利益的公平分配。总的来说,这项研究表明,以社区为基础的解决办法有可能成为恢复地雷地的次优选择。这些努力需要密切关注社会网络、权力关系、规范、规则和实践,以确保其成功,并确保社区成员真正从恢复结果中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信