{"title":"Expression of TIM-3 in transitional cell carcinoma: A comparative study of tissue and serum levels","authors":"Farrukh Siddique, Naveed Sharif, Abdul Salam, Saleha Saeed, Ayesha Qadir, Ayesha Siffat","doi":"10.1016/j.prp.2025.156031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the expression of TIM-3 in tissue and serum specimens of patients diagnosed with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), and to assess the correlation between local tissue expression and systemic serum levels.</div></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted at Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan. A total of 74 tissue samples (49 TCC cases, 25 controls) and 42 serum samples (35 TCC, 7 controls) were analyzed based on non-probability convenient sampling. Tissue TIM-3 expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC), while soluble TIM-3 (sTIM-3) concentrations in serum were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ELISA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TIM-3 expression was found to be significantly higher in TCC tissue samples compared to controls (p < 0.001), and was associated with both higher tumor grade (p = 0.040) and stage (p = 0.008). Serum sTIM-3 concentrations were slightly elevated in TCC patients compared to healthy individuals, however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.449). Also, no meaningful correlation was found between tissue TIM-3 expression and serum sTIM-3 levels (ρ = −0.119, p = 0.494).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Elevated TIM-3 expression in tumor tissue correlates with aggressive features of TCC, supporting its utility as a potential tissue-based biomarker. Serum sTIM-3, however, lacks diagnostic reliability and does not reflect tissue expression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19916,"journal":{"name":"Pathology, research and practice","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 156031"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology, research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0344033825002249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the expression of TIM-3 in tissue and serum specimens of patients diagnosed with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), and to assess the correlation between local tissue expression and systemic serum levels.
Material and method
A cross-sectional study was conducted at Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan. A total of 74 tissue samples (49 TCC cases, 25 controls) and 42 serum samples (35 TCC, 7 controls) were analyzed based on non-probability convenient sampling. Tissue TIM-3 expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC), while soluble TIM-3 (sTIM-3) concentrations in serum were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ELISA.
Results
TIM-3 expression was found to be significantly higher in TCC tissue samples compared to controls (p < 0.001), and was associated with both higher tumor grade (p = 0.040) and stage (p = 0.008). Serum sTIM-3 concentrations were slightly elevated in TCC patients compared to healthy individuals, however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.449). Also, no meaningful correlation was found between tissue TIM-3 expression and serum sTIM-3 levels (ρ = −0.119, p = 0.494).
Conclusion
Elevated TIM-3 expression in tumor tissue correlates with aggressive features of TCC, supporting its utility as a potential tissue-based biomarker. Serum sTIM-3, however, lacks diagnostic reliability and does not reflect tissue expression.
期刊介绍:
Pathology, Research and Practice provides accessible coverage of the most recent developments across the entire field of pathology: Reviews focus on recent progress in pathology, while Comments look at interesting current problems and at hypotheses for future developments in pathology. Original Papers present novel findings on all aspects of general, anatomic and molecular pathology. Rapid Communications inform readers on preliminary findings that may be relevant for further studies and need to be communicated quickly. Teaching Cases look at new aspects or special diagnostic problems of diseases and at case reports relevant for the pathologist''s practice.